SEE THIS stunning report at MassResistance about Elena Kagan’s promotion of the homosexualist and transgender political agenda at Harvard. It will blow you away. Among other things, Kagan recruited former ACLU lawyer and homosexual activist William Rubenstein to teach “queer” legal theory. She so approved of the campaign to make homosexual activism an integral part of the curriculum and campus life that she allowed discussions with activists about permitting transsexual men in women’s restrooms. Under her tenure, the Harvard health plan was changed to allow breast treatments for transsexuals.

Accordng to Amy Contrada, Brian Camenker and Peter LaBarbera,

Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan is committed to the radical campaign pushing acceptance of homosexuality and transgenderism as “civil rights.” Her unprecedented activism supporting that view as Dean of Harvard Law School (2003-2009) calls into question her ability to judge fairly and impartially on same-sex “marriage” and other homosexuality- or transgender-related issues that may come before the nation’s highest court.

Kagan’s record while Dean of Harvard Law School (HLS) demonstrates her agreement with the goals of the radical GLBT (gay lesbian bisexual transgender) movement and her solidarity with those activists. Working hand in hand with students to expel military recruiters in protest over the Armed Forces’ ban on homosexuals (a “moral injustice of the first order,” she wrote) is only the most obvious example of Kagan’s passionate dedication to this controversial and immoral agenda.

Kagan’s celebration and active promotion of the radical homosexualist and transgender worldview has profound implications. As a Supreme Court Justice, she could be expected to overturn traditional law and understandings of family, marriage, military order, and even our God-given sex (what transgender radicals call “gender identity or expression”). She is a most dangerous nominee who must be opposed by all who care about religious freedom, the preservation of marriage and traditional values….

…  Few Americans can comprehend the radical nature of “queer” academics. Rubenstein described one of his courses as the taking up of ‘newer identities (bisexuality, trans, genderf–k)’ as well as involving ‘polygamy, S&M, the sexuality of minors.’

Here is a description of Rubinstein’s 2007-08 Harvard course “Sexual Orientation and the Law:”

This course will explore the relationship between sexual orientation and law. It begins by considering the concept of “sexual orientation” – What are we talking about when we talk about sexual orientation? What is meant by that conversation? What are the relationships between sex, sexuality, sexual orientation, gender, and “trans”gender? After initial consideration of these over-arching questions, the course is organized according to the life experiences of lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals. It considers how the legal system regulates: sexuality; expressions of identity (e.g., “coming out”); the workplace; same-sex relationships; and queer parenting. Most of the legal doctrine considered in the course is constitutional in nature, including in-depth studies of the right to privacy, the First Amendment, and the equal protection clause; the course also encompasses basic employment law (e.g., Title VII) and family law doctrines. The course’s legal readings are placed within an historical framework and are supplemented by more theoretical texts of “queer theory,” as well as by selections of psychology, sociology, philosophy, theology, fiction, poetry, oral history, and journalism.

Please follow and like us: