More on Libraries
October 30, 2010
AS I WROTE in this entry, there is a basic misunderstanding about the public library’s democratic mission. The library now strives to be all things to all people. Technological change is also rapidly altering the library’s role. The library of the past is gone, but books are still the main purpose. Traditionally, a library preserves the highest. In the way, a local nature center or arboreteum protects precious wildlife or flora, a library should protect the rare and the beautiful. When the giants of the past no longer hover in the shadows, a library has all the charm of a bus station.
Kristor writes:
Any institution that orders itself in respect to the lowest common denominator will end up like the DMV. The only way a public institution can avoid the eventual heat death of utter disorder is to aim at, and insist upon, excellence: excellence in its employees, and excellence in its clients. This is true also for private institutions like churches, business enterprises and universities. The only way they can succeed over the long run is to aim at excellence. The elite universities are pretty good examples of how this is done, although they have fallen far since they began to value diversity and political correctness more than excellence and truth. Another good example: the Rangers, or for that matter any of the special forces.
Excellence is essentially inegalitarian. If a society has anything good in it, it is to that extent inegalitarian. If there are to be any good basketball players in society, those players must be better at basketball than everyone who has not played the game. And to have a basketball game, you need people who can play the game, and not everyone can; so that, if a society is to have basketball at all, it must be inegalitarian. So any positive feature of society supervenes upon the personal excellence of some portion of its people. And this means that if a society as a whole is to be any good, it must be inegalitarian. And the more a society prizes and rewards excellence, the more excellent it will be. So a functioning democracy – a functional political economy of any form at all – must be inegalitarian in practice. It must reward virtue, and penalize vice.
Laura writes:
That’s very well said. The pursuit of excellence in public libraries is complicated by technological change. Internet access, movies on DVD and music recordings: these are all things libraries now seem obligated to provide. This is an overwhelming task, making books almost seem a side business.
I am not as pessimistic, however, about public libraries as I am about public education. Libraries are not under federal or union control and, though many are dependent on state funding, they are still very much local institutions. Towns still have the ability to affect their libraries in ways they cannot affect their schools.
— Comments —
Reader N. writes:
Actually the problem is more stark than Kristor states. In order to properly function, a library must discriminate. There must be discrimination in books kept on the shelves vs. those that
are discarded. There must be discrimination in periodicals accepted vs. those rejected. There must be discrimination in all materials that are held within the library, and thus
held out to the patrons.
Furthermore, there must be discrimination regarding those who work in the library, and those who use it. A librarian must be a person who loves learning and thus loves books. This is
not a job, it is a calling. And patrons of the library must be people who approach the library as a place of knowledge and learning, not a day care center for children, nor a day time
hangout for bums, nor someone’s private Ministry of Truth.
Therefore, the library I have described above is all but impossible in the modern West, because discrimination of any sort is one of the few modern actions that can be considered a sort of sin. Those librarians who cling to the standards set in the past, such as in the Carnegie libraries, are to be applauded and supported, for they are apparently in the minority.
Eric writes:
I live in a mostly Republican suburb of Seattle. When you enter our public library, you pass down a corridor with tiled friezes on the wall, depicting various Learned Persons [tm] to emulate. They are:
In response to Eric, in regards to Salinger, I have on a previous occasion rallied to his defense and must do so once more. I wrote then, that the main character in his book:
… hates the “phoniness” that surrounds him in the world. I find this a perfect analogy to the lies upon which modern liberalism is built. He is constantly slapped down by his life experiences, which can be compared to the frustration that a traditionalist feels at having to deal with the “pop” culture that is just unavoidable today and permeates everything. His ultimate desire is to protect children while they play in a field of rye, from falling over an invisible cliff (hence the title). I found that a very powerful scene in the book. It occurs only in the mind of this hapless character, never in the reality of the narrative. When I picture it, it seems to me to be almost Arcadian. There is a lot of yearning, nostalgia and a love of one’s people in that book that I, as a conservative, really enjoyed.
Of course, the book is intended to be written in the narrative style of a pubescent boy, and can therefore be a powerful commentary on the degradations of liberal society if that boy’s though-lines and vocabulary represent his social milieu: just because the book represents this, doe not mean that it endorses it. If one is looking for Wordsworth or Shakespeare, one can go to Wordsworth or Shakespeare. Salinger is offering something entirely different and I believe many people on the right have misunderstood its significance and value.
I will however concur that for a fresco that proposes great literary personas of English literature, those represented certainly do not represent the best hearts and minds of the language. However, I find often that such criticisms overflow into open hostility against those who, while not necessarily being literary geniuses, should not be thrown into the dustbin either.
Jill F. writes:
The thread on libraries was encouraging to me primarily because I have been getting depressed every time I go to the library and I couldn’t quite put my finger on it. It’s true, that libraries have been hijacked by those who are not true literary lovers nor do they understand children. We’ve moved a lot over the years and have always made visiting the library one of our first stops in our new community. In the past 15 moves or so we have found one really wonderful children’s librarian who had, not only an abiding love of a well-written childrens literature but a deep affinity for children themselves. The librarian is a dying breed.
Also, I don’t know if this is done across the board but many of the libraries we visit have a twice a year library sale where the wonderful classics and “outdated” books are sold off for a song. You see, in order to get “funding” for new books, the library has to spend this years funds whether they are needed or not. So, the book buyers (who are they…can I be one?) often have to quickly decide which books to spend the money on and, just as quickly decide, how to make room for all these new books…thus, a library sale is crucial to make room for the new.
I’ve known schools and libraries who, in an effort not to lose their “funding” quickly buy up brand new books and stack them away in the basement where they are never used. Astonishing. The schools where this occurs often promote reading with posters and contests…why not give the students their own copies of interesting books to take home and enjoy?
But, back to the sale. Every year (or several times a year) my family and I visit the library during its sale. I dole out a few quarters and dollars to my offspring and remind them that our bookshelves at home are full to bursting and so each child just needs to pick two or three books. I reckon without the solid literature base I have fed these children on since infancy, however, and soon I am hearing their cries from across the sale tables, “Mom, they’re selling off the Carol Ryrie Brink books! Oh my gosh…how can they get rid of those?” and,”Oh, look it’s an entire set of the Harvard Classics and they haven’t even been cracked open!.” By the end of the day, I find myself joining my children in lugging bag upon bag of excellent books out of the library. We call ourselves “the Underground” and worry about the really good books which are discarded because they aren’t on this years best sellers list. And we go home gloating over our good fortune and we read.
Mabel LeBeau writes:
For my family, The Public Library, like the The Public School System, has always been a community tax-payer supported facility with which to develop an active relationship.
By the time I’d moved away from home, married, and was paying regular visits to library as a parent, books had emerged in a tremendous variety with incredible use of color and clear, accurate photographs. The focus of early visits with my first son was on non-fiction factually-correct enticements. After he learned to read “The Cat in the Hat”, and “Where is my Mother?”, the emphasis was on logic, linguistics, and comprehension. We tried a different approach with my second son as we had purchased a set of encyclopedias, and he learned to read by himself. On a topic, we would look for as many interesting books as we could at his reading level, and there was no shortage through the library and statewide inter-library loan. Many a Friday afternoon found our whole family in the library reading room before suppertime. That was not always the case. For two years we lived in a small town which did not support a public library and we had to pay an annual fee to use the county-seat’s main library which was not well-funded, frequently in disrepair and lacked sadly in selection of books for children.
As so much of our tax payments go to budget for innovation, and maintaining public entities, citizens should have an opinion (and responsibility) to respond to availability and the accessibility of library items to the patrons.
As for the librarians, as a parent, I’ve never been inclined to simply ‘drop my kid off at the library’ to carry on with errands or other business. Whether or not the library volunteers can be characterized as ‘hip’ or ‘trendy’ or working on court-ordered volunteer hours, they tend to be stationed at the check-out desk, or filing away books on the shelves.
In selecting books to take on trips, it has been a habit to go online to book review sites or to the library or new book stores to look for suggestion for anthologies and new books, then hit up used bookstores or regularly scheduled used book sales. (In our area several large used book sales held at the public library net large profits for the community as the proceeds immediately benefit our libraries in new book purchases.) Quality and selection of used books requires diligence, and a pre-set idea of what to look for in the dusty shop, as they are often stocked with a plethora of specific genres catering to a certain readership.
Current library budget cutbacks limit hours of operation, which ultimately leads to the demise of the facility known as the public library, as information and literature becomes more accessible in different venues. However, for now, the library and schools in my community are considered jewels for safekeeping.