Why Big Box Architecture is Evil
August 25, 2011
JOHN E. writes:
Jim Kalb has interviewed Nikos Salingaros (never heard of him before now) on the subject of architecture as seen in the modern world, and the war that modern architecture wages on human senses. This is an understated way of bringing your attention to what I found to be a fascinating and worthwhile read. Though I think it can only be fully appreciated in the context of the whole interview, one of the best answers Salingaros gives to a question of Kalb’s, who asks Salingaros about the religious implications of his theories:
Thank you for this thought-provoking post about modern architecture. I believe that bad motives are to blame for these monstrosities.
A community of people who share a culture and a history will build one kind of residential neighborhood. A corporation focused solely on making money will produce a different kind of residential tract housing.
A successful businessman who loves his community will finance construction of one kind of office building. A hired corporate executive more interested in his annual bonus and avoiding problems will finance another kind of building.
An architect who lives and works with local people will design a building that will fit in with the community. An architect who seeks the approval of an elite group of academics will design a building of another kind.
Modern architecture expresses the rule of corporations, governments, and academic elites over the people. Architecture should communicate love and respect for the community. Buildings should be constructed so as to serve the community for many years. Modern buildings instead tend to communicate such materialistic or domineering messages as “low
overhead,” “easy parking,” “elite architectural design,” “suburban conformity” or “powerful government.”