The Values of Graham Spanier
November 17, 2011
GRAHAM SPANIER, who was forced to resign as Penn State president last week in response to the Jerry Sandusky scandal, wrote an article in 1975 for the Archives of Sexual Behavior on wife-swapping. The academic article opens with this:
This article attempts to illuminate the understanding of swinging, or mate swapping, an increasingly common form of extramarital sexual activity. A theoretical formulation argues that swinging is a form of extramarital sexual activity which serves to define as good and acceptable a behavior that in other forms and in the past has been considered deviant or immoral.
Spanier, who earned his Ph.D. in sociology from Northwestern University and studied wife-swapping for his dissertation, has been the object of criticism by conservative activists for years. He remains a tenured professor at Penn State after resigning his administrative position, which gave him an annual income of more than half a million dollars. It is no surprise in light of his history that when charges were filed against an athletic director and vice president who failed to report the child rapes to the police, he expressed support for his employees and no concern for the victims.
In 1995, when Spanier was under consideration for the president’s spot at Penn State, the student body president at the University of Nebraska, where Spanier was formerly employed as president, told the Penn State college newspaper: “He very much focuses on affirmative action and a pro-homosexual agenda. Watch out for his social agenda and make sure he doesn’t make it a priority over academics.”
Here are the few of the events that took place under Spanier, as reported by the American Family Association of Pennsylvania:
November 18, 2000 – Womyn’s Concerns and the Feminist Majority Leadership Alliance (FMLA) held C-Fest – “an event featuring performance art, music and a reading from Inga Muscio, author of the book C_____: A Declaration of Independence.” Jess Dobkin, Lesbian performing artist, in various states of nudity. One report says it featured nudity, vulgar sexual references, and anti-male rants.
February 2001 – Womyn’s Concerns hosted “Sex Faire” to discuss “issues of Sexual health, consensual activities and liberation.” Included games such as ‘pin the clitoris on the vulva’ and ‘orgasm bingo.’ A book table featured “Smut and Other Great Literature.”
October 2001 – Larry Flynt, publisher of Hustler magazine, accepted an invitation to speak.
February 2002 – third annual “Sex Faire” Womyn’s Concerns keynote speakers included Patrick Califia Rice, female to male transsexual and author of sadomasochistic books such as “Macho Sluts” and “Public Sex: The Culture of Radical Sex” and supporter of NAMBLA ; Sarah Weddington, a lawyer who won Roe v. Wade; Leslie Feinberg speaking on ‘Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgendered Health Liberation;” and Wendy Sanford presenting “Our Bodies, Ourselves: Body, Image, Self-Care and Sexual Choices for Women.’ Number of workshops from Homosexuality to safe sex erotic. Information about Planned Parenthood was Available and free condoms were handed out.’ (a three day event)
October 2002 – announcement made “Process to Create LGBT Minor to Begin”
February 6, 2003 – FMLA brings Vagina Monologues to campus
February 15, 2003 – Womyn’s Concerns and FMLA bring back “Sex Faire” for five hours only (5:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.) four-one-hour workshops – participants Include Planned Parenthood and Choice USA. Games include orgasm bingo and body painting for a lesson on consent.
April 8, 2006 – Mr. and Ms. Gay Penn State ‘Pageant
— Comments —
Torquemada writes:
The postmodern academic enshrinement of the perverted and the transgressive was what I saw coming back in ’73, when Jill Johnston was invited to the University of Kansas. The impact of her presence for me, as a nineteen-year-old, derived from the knowledge that she had been invited to speak at an institution of higher learning by those in positions of putative authority. Graham Spanier, as a college president, was simply continuing the reprobate trend that I referred to in my comments on the passing of Johnston:
“Her very presence on a university campus was an admission by those in power that the “long march through the institutions” would be allowed to proceed apace, and that gratuitous freakishness could now be marketed as a stimulant. “