The Unmentionable Dead
January 8, 2012
AT VFR, Mark Jaws writes:
Since the Civil Rights Act of 1964 somewhere between 30,000 to 40,000 whites have been murdered by blacks. On average blacks murder about 750 whites per year, while the annual “white” on black murder rate (no doubt many Hispanics are included among the “white” perpetrators) is about 250. According to the Tuskegee Institute, between 1880 and 1950 white mobs lynched 3,300 blacks. Thus in a period of 45 years approximately ten times as many whites have been murdered by blacks than all the blacks lynched in America during the allegedly murderous reign of Jim Crow. Facts — indisputable, and so sadly, unmentionable.
— Comments —
James H. writes:
The numbers may be even worse than Mark Jaws indicates. I cannot attest to the accuracy, but these numbers are markedly more harrowing.
James H. adds:
There is a “jew controlled media” reference at the top of the page I linked which I most definitely do not endorse, but I do believe, particularly after perusing some of the links, that the author’s larger point, that the government and media are under representing black on white crime rates, is a good one.
Diana writes:
There are about 14,000 murders a year in the US, not, as the link your reader provided states, 41,000. See this Wikipedia entry.
The crime problem in this country is bad, and it is intimately associated with race, about which we lie infinitely. But the link was from a very dodgy source.
James H. writes:
The article I linked admittedly is difficult to follow. The author accurately reports a 1994 homicide rate of 23,300 homicides in 1994 and then goes on to conclude that the black on white crime rate is higher than reported because the uncleared crimes are not being proportionately attributed to blacks.
If the ratio by race at which homicides are not cleared is similar to the ratio at which they are cleared, then each of the following above estimates for black homicide rates must be increased 54%.
O.K. nobody is going to argue with that, but:
It’s even possible that all of the 10,218 uncleared murders were committed by blacks, in which event the number of murders commited by blacks must be increased 2.2 FOLD, from 8,192 to 18,140, making blacks responsible for almost three quarters of all murders in 1994.
Perhaps blacks are more likely to be overrepresented in the uncleared murders, but he offers no proof of the same and loses credibility by so positing.
Furthermore, he goes on to up the ante to 41,250 by engaging in wild speculation:
Would it be possible that the FEDERAL government on the other hand, who tells us that only 2,000 soldiers died in Iraq so far, COULD and WOULD manipulate such data? Of course it would. IF 33 million blacks in this country actually commit homicide at the rate of 125 (the average for the above cities), THEN they ALREADY murder 41,250 Americans every year, most of them WHITES, just as Kamau Kambon demanded on NATIONAL TV.
One does not have to don a tin-foil hat to reasonably speculate that the government is purposefully under representing black on white crime statistics – after all, we see the MSM doing so every single day of our lives, but these sorts of arm chair statistical “leaps” do his cause no good.
James H. adds:
His two most useful points are this:
Black on white crime is being underrepresented in government statistics by failing to include a reasonable estimate of black on white crimes in the uncleared category.
White crime is being significantly overrepresented by misleadingly including Hispanics in the white crime category.
Both of these errors lead to erroneous conclusions regarding the disparity of the likelihood of blacks to commit violent crimes against whites and, vice versa, the likelihood of whites to commit violent crimes against blacks (nearly nil in the real world).
One statistic I see bandied about is the 30,000 rapes by blacks against whites annually which seems extremely high.
Bottom line: blacks with low impulse control are committing mayhem against the European stock of this country at frightening and seemingly accelerating rates and the magnitude of this problem is being purposefully downplayed by the media and government. The mayhem against whites dwarfs the crimes against blacks since the civil war (an estimated 3,500 hangings many of which were simple extra-judicial justice).
Surely these disparities in black/white crime rates are simply the product “legacy of slavery” and attaching any more pernicious interpretation is merely and expression of white racism? Correct? Well, let’s take a closer look.
Personally, I do not believe the crime rates we have been discussing are an expression of the legacy of slavery or an organized attempt by blacks to destroy the white race, but rather the product of several factors: social policies that direct us to ignore the problem; low impulse control and inherent criminality in the black population; discounting of the value of European civilization; and an active effort by nihilistic utopian leftists to deconstruct our European civilization, culture and religion.
Laura writes:
You mention, “social policies that direct us to ignore the problem.” I would change that to: social policies that encourage the problem. Welfare produces fatherlessness and destroys male authority among blacks, leading to more crime.
