IN AN article posted at Gates of Vienna last month, Norwegian boys describe their experiences growing up in heavily Muslim neighborhoods of Oslo:

Andreas believes that the Norwegian culture is being squeezed out.

“Nobody wants to be a Norwegian here. Norwegian is synonymous with weakness. This is a feeling that is also being conveyed by the teachers.

“They are afraid. They don’t dare to speak out. You should have a look at the number of principals that have come and gone at Vestliveien school in recent years, and ask them why they left. They don’t have control, but they do everything to accommodate the Muslim students. In home economics classes everybody has to prepare halal meat. Immigrants do not have to attend ‘NyNorsk’ classes [literally New-Norwegian, which is a different dialect and a different way to write Norwegian — there are two forms of written Norwegian]. I have to attend these classes. The Muslim girls do not have to attend the physical activity classes; because of course they cannot undress in front of other girls. We have to adapt to their culture. They don’t have to adapt to ours.”

Andreas’ views on girls:

“There is one thing that annoys the hell out of me. They can start chasing Norwegian girls, but we cannot go after theirs. It’s something you learn early on. You just don’t go after a Pakistani girl, but Norwegian girls are available to immigrant boys. Norwegian girls prefer them. I don’t know why. I guess it must be that brown skin. That they are tough, that they have money despite not having jobs. They don’t see that they fight in packs, that they are cowards. I asked my best female friend if we could get romantically involved, and she told me that I have the right personality, but the problem was that I’m Norwegian. She wants to become involved with a foreigner.”

He believes that Oslo will eventually become Oslostan.

—- Comments —

John writes:

“Norwegian girls prefer them. I don’t know why.” Well, I know why, and it’s from a lifetime of observation. Women are simply attracted to strong and dominant men. That’s why feminism is absurd.

Don Vincenzo writes:

It has been more than two years since I posted comments about the impact of Third World immigration into Norway, aided and abetted by their Labor Party, and its baleful consequences, including the increasing level of rapes of Norwegian women by (mainly) Middle Eastern men. (See VFR May 2011) In addition to having some experience of living and working in Norway (1984-88), I maintain a personal interest in what is going on in Norway’s capital: my grandson lives there. I also still keep in contact with Norwegians with whom I worked and are still living in Oslo.

While my grandson attended Norwegian schools, he would often write to inform me that the state educational system was clearly setting a double standard by making life very easy for Muslim children, while, at the same time, doing the exact opposite to Norwegian students. Especially in disciplinary matters, basically there were no standards set for Muslim students, including boys engaged in petty extortion, which would have set off alarums if committed by Norwegians.

Students of high school age can often sense weakness, and these criminal activities continued unabated: my grandson was often relieved of any money he carried, so he learned not to carry any “penger” (Norwegian for “money”) to school.  And what happened in the schoolyard was duplicated on the bus. Despite pleas by parents, precious little was done to exercise some form of oversight or discipline by school authorities, and the standard line about “Third World” immigrants had to be granted more leeway was the oft-cited response.

When I left Norway, the country was still about 95% homogenous (the other 5% included Finns, other Scandinavians, and the recent arrival of Pakistani), but by the mid 1990s, the telltale signs of a Third World invasion were palpable: the railroad terminal in Oslo’s center had become a dangerous place at night, something unheard of previously. Then, predictably, drugs became omnipresent when increasing number of Pakistani immigrants brought that trade with them, and, rape became a serious problem, again something unheard of. Still, through all of this there has been no effort to alter the immigration system, or to recognize the double standards that obviously still exist in Norwegian schools. And there will not be, I assure you.

The Norwegian response is no different from the responses of the other countries of Western Europe, and, I might add, these United States: the sound of silence. With the exception of the repeated warning of Geert Wilders’s jeremiads, business proceeds as usual, for each nation refuses to recognize the elephant in the room.

The question really comes down to this: not “What will be done?” but “What Can be done?” I truly wish that I am wrong, but Norway and the other Scandinavian and European countries, along with the U.S., are proceeding down the road that the masterful Larry Auster described, as “the path to national suicide.”

Please follow and like us: