MEN Having Babies, an organization that helps its “gay clientele” rent wombs and buy babies, is having its Ninth Annual Men Having Babies Surrogacy Conference in ten days. As Pope Francis says, enter into the “moral darkness” around you. But don’t become obsessed with it. There are more important things to think about. Check it out. This is a pedophile’s dream come true. All of this is perfectly legal in good ol’ America, where anything can be bought and anything can be sold.

—Comments —

Megasaint writes:

Don’t forget all that propaganda of “Do NOT breed children!” from the stupid Time magazine and many liberal blogs, all aimed at heterosexual couples while on the other hand and at the same time you can read all those same liberal places and magazines encouraging homosexual men and women to “breed” or “adopt” as many babies and children as possible. There is “no overpopulation problems” when it comes to gays and lesbians who want newborn babies from artificial insemination or through the belly-renting business.

This is nothing less than an INTERNATIONAL WORLD WAR against the family!!!!!

“Human sexuality is a kind of distortion field that keeps us from seeing reality and logic clearly.” – Anonymus.

Diana writes:

The repulsive organization “Men Having Babies” is familiar to me. I cannot understand how any human being can think of this as anything other than macabre.

Men using wombs to breed impersonally isn’t life – it is a form of death. It is killing the mother, literally.

But I wrote to point out that indeed “the good ol’ USA” is alone in its laissez-faire attitude towards this grotesque commercialization of reproduction. Laws vary by state, but there are enough “surrogacy friendly” states so that the US is one of the world centers of the biz.

The UN may be a mostly useless forum of windbags, but I hope that one day, the UN will pass a law against surrogacy. It may be a toothless law, but it will be at least a gesture.

The only thing that will stop America’s descent into the abyss is being outed and shamed in the court of international opinion. I hope that one day surrogacy will become the subject of international scandal and outrage, which may kickstart efforts to outlaw it here, on the Federal level.

Surrogacy is NOT condoned worldwide. Japan: “In March 2008, the Science Council of Japan proposed a ban on surrogacy and said that doctors, agents and their clients should be punished for commercial surrogacy arrangements.” Iceland: “All surrogacy arrangements (both commercial and altruistic) are illegal.”

Bless the Japanese and the Icelandic people. Truly enlightened countries, and countries which care about their patrimony and their posterity, have outlawed this dehumanizing trade.

Right now, the only organization that I know of, which is fighting surrogacy in the U.S., is this.

They produced this film about the “fertility industry.”

Egg donation is risky. I hope that the two gay daddies explain that to “their” daughters when they grow up.

I clicked on the link, and I note that the event celebrating motherless breeding is being held at a Jewish Community Center. Non-religious Jewish institutions are the worst offenders in the war against nature and humanity. Well, let’s see what the Jewish community looks like in two generations after the Orthodox have taken over. Non-Orthodox Jews have a well below replacement level birthrate, the Orthodox, well above. The Non-Orthodox will NOT make up for their lack of numbers by resorting to gimmicks like this. It is truly the sign of a dying people.

Of course, the children born are not gimmicks, and when their parents break up, the courts will have to clean up the mess.

Laura writes:

Thank you for the background.

Altruistic surrogacy, in which the mother is not paid (“mother” in this case often involves a woman who is carrying the biological child of another woman and man), is also outlawed in many countries, as it should be.

Jane writes:

All the flag-waving and cheerleading these girls are being roped into will serve very well to stifle any questions they might have one day about their mothers.

Buck writes:

This is so depraved and sick that I can’t stand the sight of the faces of these freaks. They’re beyond contempt. How do you measure the savaging and ravaging of these innocent young girls essences?

I read this story two weeks ago, and set it aside because it was such a sickening next step in the logical progression of this undeniable assault on the natural order of being. What’s next? There will be continuing bizarre and sick manifestations of this sickness. It’s unleashed, unconstrained and little resisted. Every line, every sentiment and detail in this story is repugnant and sickening.

Laura writes:

That story is revolting.

 Diana writes:

I wrote:

“The only thing that will stop America’s descent into the abyss….”

On reading this I saw I mis-wrote. We’re already in the abyss. But I don’t give up hope that we can pull ourselves out, by our own efforts and, crucially, with the help of other civilized countries, who will shun us for our cheapening of human life.

I see the surrogacy industry as analogous to the slave trade. Country by country, this practice must be outlawed. Then we will be exposed as the last criminal standing.

I have had arguments with pro-gay rights people on this subject. All lefty luvvies. When I tell them that Japan (the epitome of cool, in their eyes, with their manga and anime) and Iceland (progressive Nordic country), outlaw surrogacy, they are astonished. They are really so provincial, they only see things through American eyes.

When I tell them that the U.S. is unique in its commodification of everything, they get tongue-tied, because they agree with that. I have introduced a dilemma and they have to choose: what’s more important, gay rights, or commerce?

To these maniacs, gay rights is everything. Putin is now The Most Evil Man on Earth, even though he behaved sensibly with respect to Syria. I have little doubt that if he hadn’t intervened, we’d be in another war right now.

I totally agree with you that Putin is not in the long run trustworthy, but I bring up the example to show how nuts the gay rights movement and their allies are. To them, their cause is everything.

Jane writes:

“All the flag-waving and cheerleading these girls are being roped into will serve very well to stifle any questions they might have one day about their mothers.”

Do you really think so? The burgeoning movement of children trying to find out who their sperm donor fathers were would undercut that.

In a few years these girls will be asking, “Who is my mommy?” Yeah, the “fathers” will try to put them off with propaganda but it will be impossible. Kids are terrific, relentless little truth-seekers and no matter how much adults try to stifle them, they will keep at it. This happened with adoption, it is happening with sperm donation, and it will happen with egg donation.

Alex writes:

Megasaint writes:

This is nothing less than an INTERNATIONAL WORLD WAR against the family!!!!!

The real war, a war of extermination, is against white Christians in Europe and everywhere else. The destruction of the family is a potent weapon in this war but it is only a weapon; a means to an end. The end itself is the extermination of white Christians everywhere.

Only the blind can’t see that it is only in the white Christian countries that the progressive power based in the U.S. and Brussels pushes extreme liberation of women and perverts and all the other ways of destroying the family. African, Middle Eastern, Asian and Latin American countries, in many of which women are far from liberated and perverts are punished by death, are mysteriously left alone, while Russia, Serbia and other post-communist Christian white countries are under all-out assault to embrace perversion.

Laura writes:

I would say the end itself is the reign of Satan. Whites must be dehumanized to achieve that end.

Diana writes:

No matter what the pro-surrogacy propagandists say, we do NOT know the real life (and death) risks of this procedure, which is only 30 years old.

Please see this.

The first comment is especially cogent. Jennifer Lahl, who is the beleaguered general of the anti-surrogacy movement (or should I call it the infertility complex exposure movement?) also commented. She is a very brave lady.

A Grateful Reader writes:

How is one to respond to an unmarried female acquaintance (well-educated and with a high status job) who has had children using a sperm bank? How should one respond to a married female acquaintance (of similarly privileged background) who has had children using her husband’s sperm paired with eggs purchased from a younger woman? How shall one treat their children? Each woman has more than one child, children who are thus full siblings.

Although one might not have gay friends with children–yet, how should one respond to the purchased children of gays? To the gays themselves?

Laura writes:

I imagine there would be no basis for friendship in such cases. Children suffer more in the long run when people treat an injustice against them as just part of normal life.

Jane writes:

Diana writes:

“Do you really think so?”

I know so.

“The burgeoning movement of children trying to find out who their sperm donor fathers were would undercut that.”

And they will have to slog their way through red tape, lies and stonewalling. Been there, done that.

Please follow and like us: