— Comments —

Buck writes:

The two homosexual males with a young boy and a baby, depicted in the commercial, are the subject of an “official” Honey Maid documentary. (it followed the posted Youtube) Less than 2 minutes. I transcribed it:

Honey Maid Documentary: Dad & Papa | Official

Young boy: If I had to describe my parents…my dad would be like the smart one, and everything. And my papa would be…he’s the funny one. We all work out time for each other, so we’ll always have dinner together, always share the best and worst of the day. It’s unusually hard to come up with a worst.

dad: None of it seemed real until we were matched with a birth mother and when they did an ultrasound. I just remember feeling like that was – that was our kid. We’re kind of traditional guys; marriage and family, having kids was always important to me. We met in line at a coffee shop. I knew that week that I was going to marry him…

papa: What’s interesting is that you said you knew you were going to marry me. But, that wasn’t even in our thought pattern…

dad: …like having a mortgage together – is what I gay people thought, so yeah, that’s what I thought.

Young boy: One of my favorite memories is the day we “got” Wyatt (a newborn). I really just can’t wait until he gets older.

dad: I don’t know, life feels so much more meaningful as parents then it felt before. It’s almost overwhelming – that kind of love.

Presented by Honey Maid: THIS IS WHOLESOME

Neither of the two homosexual males is a man, unless the definition of a man is lost too. There might be a residual of masculinity in their stew of femininity, but none of the attributes that make up a man (a man, by my definition, being the counterpart to a woman) will be seen by the two boys at home. So, what are the chances that the two innocent young male victims of this cradle-to-maturity psychological abuse will become healthy masculine men? They’ll encounter men outside of their family. Will they admire them or harbor a confused disdain? What happens if and when these young boys do become men? Is it just like any other family issue?

The selfishness of these two homosexuals, and of the increasing numbers like them, is sickness bordering on evil. The two boys are human accessories. Their purpose is to “normalize” “dad and papa,” two males who by definition are not normal. I’m certain that deep down they know it.

The ideal of “love” (“that kind of love”) that these homosexuals claim, is their foundational lie. Their unconstrained desire is not love. They may have feelings for the young boys, just as an adulterer may have “feelings” for his betrayed wife, or that the dominant male homosexual has for his submissive target. In all of these cases, the actor is destroying. How can anyone claim to truly love the very person that they are knowingly and repeatedly inflicting damage and life-altering pain on?

Laura writes:

I assume they don’t think they are inflicting damage. But it’s still not love.

“We’re kind of traditional guys; marriage and family, having kids was always important to me.” Yes, it’s so very traditional to buy children as if they were commodities.

This is what corporate America considers wholesome.

Please follow and like us: