A Father and His World
June 15, 2014
FATHER’S DAY brings to mind a father whom I never knew but who nevertheless had a major influence on my life. My father-in-law, Frank Wood, was dead — and had been dead for ten years — by the time I married my husband 27 years ago.
Though I never met my father-in-law, it’s not as if I don’t know him. I think I know him pretty well and if he walked in the front door today, I would probably recognize him and know exactly what to offer him to eat and drink. However, I don’t think he would walk in the door if he were alive. He was a man bound to his home and his neighborhood for all but two weeks of the year.
I have a vivid image of him, sitting at the kitchen table on a Sunday evening, having spent a weekend of leisure both at home and at the Eagle Club nearby, and announcing to the assembled at dinner, “Well, the ball game’s over now.” He has told his last story and retold his last joke. He has read his last detective story and flipped the pages of his last adventure magazine. He is approaching his final bites of “rope beef.” Those words on Sunday night signaled that his extended time at home was over and the new week, when he would return to the shipyard where he worked as a machinist, had begun.
The ball game was over, but it would start again in five days. On Friday nights, he had another famous line. When he was sitting late at the dining room table and the assembled started to walk away because they had heard him tearfully recite Babe Ruth’s farewell speech one too many times and were tired of hearing the jokes he had also told many times before, he would say, in a moment of maudlin seriousness, after noticing the slipping away, “All I really want in life is a little love and affection.” To which everyone would roll their eyes as if to say, “Oh, shut up, Pop!” His gentle rule was not without its insurrections.
My father-in-law was not a wealthy man. His mother died when he was 13 and his overwhelmed father left his three children permanently with relatives. In other words, they were abandoned, a development toward which my father-in-law never expressed the slightest resentment. And so he was accustomed to having little, and much he never had. By society’s lights, he was not a person of remarkable talents or impressive ambition. He was not a great athlete, had no truly productive hobbies and was not a civic leader of any kind. But he took pride in his trade, which had required a four-year apprenticeship, and he performed it well, never once being late for work in 43 years. He did not view his job simply as a job. Being a machinist was a skill he had mastered and he loved his work, though he loved his days off even more.
Despite the lack of great distinction and affluence, Frank Wood, who walked to the shipyard every day and whose favorite book was Pudd’nhead Wilson, had things that a working man today cannot dream of possessing. He was the benevolent, sometimes irritating and never autocratic monarch of a tiny, urban kingdom, a roomy and flagrantly shabby Victorian twin house in the city of Chester, Pennsylvania that was inhabited by a wife who went to Mass every morning and made dinner every night; five imperfect children who walked home from St. Michael’s school in a line of pupils in suits and ties or dresses; a varying number of boarders who shared the mashed potatoes and helped keep the household afloat but not so well that the family was not forced to go without heat for a few days now and then in the winter; and a mongrel dog named “Buttons” (aka Butsy-Wutsy) who had more lovers than Don Juan, walked to the butcher shop himself to pick up a bone, killed cats without remorse and always looked both ways before crossing a city street. The household also encompassed an ever-flowing stream of humanity that came and went through the front door, which was never locked. The visitors included an uncle who was a school janitor. He arrived without fail every Christmas Eve with the school’s leftover Christmas tree which was promptly set up in the shabby living room and surrounded by laughter, conversation, gift-giving, eating, drinking, and various forms of human irritation. My father-in-law once referred to the bond he had with his wife, formerly Kate Kerrigan, who was about five feet tall in heels and also was orphaned as a child, as “35 years of savage amusement.”
All this, Frank Wood supported with his skilled labor as a working man. And he supported it not with relentless, unforgiving labor. In fact, on his weekends and in the evenings, he was a man of leisure. He had no lawn to mow or hedges to clip. He didn’t have to drive his children to Little League games or soccer matches; they had plenty of opportunities to play ball right on the street outside their door. He didn’t have to do many domestic chores because his wife took care of most of those during the week. He was free to dream, to sketch, to tell stories, to drink beer, to read and to laugh, which was a common pastime in the dingy house.
Every year, the whole entourage packed into two cars and drove to Wildwood, New Jersey for two weeks of complete leisure, during which Frank Wood would implacably sit on the salt water as if he was on a chaise lounge and float for hours on end. It was an idyllic two weeks in a town of working class bungalows by the sea. Nothing much ever went wrong, excepting the time when the police showed up at the front door of the two-bedroom cottage where 15 or so people stayed and insisted that Buttons, who was part dachshund, had killed a neighbor’s Persian cat. It was the one and only time that Buttons showed fear. He began to tremble uncontrollably, a sure sign of a guilty conscience. The whole family rallied around Buttons and insisted he would never do such a thing, even though he had decimated the cat population back home in Chester. Given the lack of evidence, the police officer told the cat’s owner that the only way guilt could possibly be established was if the cat was dug up from its fresh grave in the backyard and an autopsy was conducted. Fortunately, the owner, who was very upset by the loss of his pet, did not want to desecrate the grave in this way, and Buttons went on to hunt and romance for many more years until he died of a heart attack immediately after killing his last cat. He had a wonderful career.
Like Buttons, Frank Wood was part of a cohesive community of those who tolerated his excesses; he was not an atom in a dizzyingly impersonal world. He belonged to a place that as his children entered adolescence distressingly unraveled, a place that became part of the archipelago of urban devastation that has existed in America ever since. By the time Joe Hoffman, a father of ten, was shot to death while walking the few steps from the parish hall to the rectory with the bingo proceeds in his hands and Libby Greenleaf, the crossing guard who never missed a day of work, had been beaten with a claw hammer to within an inch of her life during a burglary in her tiny row house, everything was pretty much undone. Frank and Kate remained in the shabby Victorian when almost everyone around them had left for the suburbs. My husband was the first of the family to go to college. He often recalls the time when he visited his parents while he was living in Philadelphia. He was heading out the door to go back to school a little sooner than they had expected. His father wondered that he was leaving. “There’s nothing for him here, Pop,” Kate said, words which still cause a pang of filial guilt.
It was almost true. There was nothing much left for him or for anyone. No more children walked in lines to school in suits and ties. St. Michael’s, once the most glorious edifice in their enclave — the industrial counterpart of a cathedral in the center of a medieval village — would soon close and the parish would sell its magnificent stained glass windows. The altar before which Buttons had once scandalously fought with the priest’s dog, Playboy, (who started it) would no longer see the daily consecrations that had been the heart of their world. There was nothing left of extended family in the neighborhood except those two elderly people and many indelible memories of savage amusement. Today the social institutions that once made it possible for a working man to be that kind of urban patriarch, a man who floated blissfully in the lap of the ocean every August, surrounded by a large family that was sustained by ancient traditions and his manual labor, are all but gone as well.
Happy Father’s Day, Frank. I never knew you. But I will remember you always.
— Comments —
Sheila writes:
That was a beautifully written elegy for the America so many of us or our parents grew up in, now vanished to unbridled greed and multiculturalism.
Frank Wood may not have been a man of “distinction and affluence,” but he was rich in what mattered. Family, faith, tradition, and community. He knew what he valued and why, albeit without much introspection, and was well able to transmit those same values to his descendants. Despite early heartbreak and setbacks, he did not wallow in self-pity or strike out in anger, but accepted that which he could not change and settled to perform to the best of his ability that which God had apportioned him.
Thank you for blessing your readers with his memory.
Thank you for your lovely, bittersweet remembrance of your father-in-law. Reading it brought such an agony of Weltschmerz to my heart, the tears came unbeckoned. I think we are of a similar age and I remember the world of Frank Wood only in the rearview mirror, and–thankfully–in books I read. I read a lot, mostly nonfiction, and I consciously read books about that lost world, so I know it existed.
I so would like to live in a secure world like that, where “men were men, and boys were boys;” I’d like my children to know this world. But as I often think (and sometimes say), you can’t buy a childhood like that of your husband, or that of your correspondent Alan in St. Louis, for love or money today.
The insouciance of childhood, the lack of adult supervision, the many kids playing in the neighborhood (like your fil’s children playing baseball in the street) are no more to be found. Simply vanished (for the most part; of course, there are exceptions) under the heavy hand of government planning, women working, people wanting more and more things, the selfishness of adults who often don’t even bother to procreate; the horror of unbridled abortion, no fault divorce. The heart of this tragedy might be the loss of faith in almighty God, the loss of reverence for life that an abortion culture engenders. Predating abortion culture is the endless quest to separate copulation from conception, spectacularly accomplished with the pill in 1960.
Do I need to add that I know life was not perfect then either, but hey — I often feel I am an outcast in a world of pod people.
If a writer’s job is to make people see through words, you make us see in 3-D Dolby Surround Sound. Excellent. I can smell the smoke from your father-in-law’s tavern mingled with beer on tap. Thank you for that. I’m thankful for my own father. He wasn’t a mason, but he could lay brick. He wasn’t a mechanic, but he could swap a transmission out and tune up his car. He wasn’t a carpenter, but he could move an interior wall and replace windows and doors. He could fix anything. He was, above everything else, a man. I feel so fortunate to have been raised by a real one.
Laura writes:
Thank you.
Mary writes:
The piece on your father in law is wonderful! I love this description of him: “He was the benevolent, sometimes irritating and never autocratic monarch of a tiny, urban kingdom…”. Ah, the mini-monarchy that is the happy family – building block of happy human society – complete with benevolent king, wise queen, and minions – pages, squires, ladies-in-waiting – and, if one is lucky, maybe a court jester for levity.
Much has been lost, for various reasons, not the least of which is the “dehumanizing technologism” mentioned in the TTH post “Christopher Dawkins on Technology”. But also, I have spent much time pondering how my parent’s innocence was used against them when we were young, for because of that innocence they truly couldn’t see the danger in allowing their children free participation in a new, youth-centric, independent culture starting to grow in the fifties (exploding in the sixties), which had an entirely different focus from the old, as it was a culture created not to bring generations together but to excise one generation from the other, in order to separate children from their parents’ influence, i.e. their traditions, be they religious, ethnic or otherwise: the ties that bind us. This culture our parents didn’t realize could only be successfully battled with a strong presence of faith in the home, calling upon the aid of the supernatural. So they let it slip away. So now we rebuild.
Laura writes:
Thanks.