EDWARD BARTLETT writes:

More evidence that the campus radicals care more about having an “issue” to promote … than addressing the problem of hyper-sexualized campus environments.

Of note, the Sex Week is co-sponsored by the University of New Mexico Women’s Resource Center.

— Comments —

Sage McLaughlin writes:

Anarcho-tyranny, anyone?  A more illustrative example of the concept will be hard to come by.

Laura writes:

Anarcho-tyranny, to paraphrase Samuel Francis, involves tyranny imposed because of a refusal to control the real problem.

Thomas F. Bertonneau writes:

What qualifies the pornographic University of New Mexico “Sex-Week” poster as an element of anarcho-tyranny is its simultaneity in campus life with the puritanical anti-sex and anti-male campaigns of the feminists and the inquisitorial, defendants-have-no-rights “sexual-assault” codes that become daily more monstrous and absurd.  The directors of campus life everywhere are hortators to students of two incompatible mandates: One is to have sex promiscuously and polymorphously; the other, directed almost exclusively at male students, is that any sexual activity can be construed ex post facto as criminal, thereby subjecting the male agent to bureaucratic procedures in which he has no defendant rights, and which can leave him branded for life as a malefactor.  In egging on all students to have sex, the people urging such programs are in effect asking men to set themselves up to be fall-guys.

I would like to see the New York legislature enact a law forbidding colleges and universities of the state system or private ones that accept state or federal funding from adjudicating sexual assault and rape allegations on their own, and requiring them to turn such cases over immediately to local police jurisdictions.  I am indulging a pipe-dream, of course, but that is how it should be.

Laura writes:

These cases should be dealt with by the police.

Bert Perry writes:

Please follow and like us: