PAUL T. writes:

The most scathing article I’ve run across on the case of Wyatt (“Nicole”) Maines is by (I presume) a homosexual, writing from a non-Christian perspective; even so, the author makes some strong points and raises some unpleasant facts we’re not too likely to hear amid all the triumphalist hoopla over this case.

Laura writes:

Thank you, but that article is too crude and blasphemous — more anti-Christian than non-Christian. It’s sad how many writers on the Internet can’t make a simple point without resorting to four-letter words or blasphemies. I do agree, however, with one point the author makes in a roundabout way. Transgenderism is really the ultimate form of non–acceptance of effeminate qualities in boys. It is not compassionate or virtuous tolerance. It can’t abide that children may go through passing phases or that some human beings have qualities more characteristic of the opposite sex and yet have value as they are.

So unaccepting is transgender ideology of boys who act like girls and girls who act like boys that it endorses grotesque physical mutilation that rivals African clitorectomies and Chinese foot-binding as socially-acceptable forms of torture.

Transgenderism is ultimately not about helping the confused. It’s about destroying all traces of the highest cultural expression of differentiation and mutual charity between the sexes that has ever existed on earth.

— Comments —

Natassia writes:

Since Wyatt Maines is an identical twin, this seems to show that transsexuality (or homosexual tendencies that have been “nurtured” into a desire to BE the opposite sex) is probably not congenital, or at least not always congenital. He and his twin brother were at one point a single fertilized egg. They developed in the same womb and were exposed to the same hormones.

Wyatt was described as the more outgoing twin whereas his brother Jonas is reserved. I suspect this is a case of homosexual narcissism—the identical twin seeks to be differentiated from his “clone” and how better to do that than to become a girl? And now Wyatt is sexually interested in men, (likely encouraged by his identification with being female), therefore he is now a homosexual. An effeminate homosexual. “Becoming” a girl gave Wyatt instant celebrity status, brought more attention from his parents, and provided a way to be as unique as is possible for an identical twin.

His parents should have nipped this narcissism in the bud a long time ago. But instead they fed his self-obsession to the point that he now gets to rule a public school, waste over $1000 per month on unnecessary hormones, and waste tens of thousands of dollars to mutilate his body.

Just my opinion, of course.

Buck writes:

Wyatt, it’s said, was only briefly confused or troubled by any of this, and that was only, as it’s described, in a matter-of-fact, house-keeping kind of way. At age four, he is said to have said to his mother: “When do I get to be a girl?”, and to his father he said about his penis: (paraphrase) I hate it. When will I be rid of it? Wyatt and “identical” twin Jonas “knew” from the beginning that Wyatt was a “girl”. It was dad and mom and the rest of their society who were troubled and confused about it.

Wyatt, the young child, “led them” all out of their trouble and confusion. She inspired them and gave them all a lesson in courage.

At some point, early and widely, agreement fostered a general committment to eliminating every structural and institutional threat to Wyatt’s autonomy and self-esteem, while the gender-management professionals attended to the beards and breasts sort of thing. Wyatt’s “special” courage was given primacy over his unalterable altered nature. Wyatt must feel exceptional and uniquely empowered. The family now has a heroic figure who inspires them, rather than a tragic one that they might have lamented.

Dad said: “We told our kids you can’t create change if you don’t get involved.”

“She really is a girl,’’ Kelly, Wyatt’s mom, says, “a girl born with a birth defect. That’s how she looks at it.”

 Mary writes:

Here are two money quotes from the piece in the Boston Globe (included in the previous entry):

“As usual, he relied on his wife’s instincts. ‘I have to tell you, Kelly’s the leader in our family,’ he says. ‘Both she and Nicole are extremely strong-willed, and I went with the flow.’”

This is the father speaking.

By the time the boys were five it was a done deal; even the grandmother was enabling the situation:

“When the boys were five, Kelly and Wayne threw a “get-to-know-me’’ party for classmates and parents. Wyatt appeared beaming at the top of the stairs in a princess gown, a gift from his grandmother.”

The limitless “choices” presented by the modern age will be our undoing.

Please follow and like us: