Web Analytics
Women May Be in Combat in Britain by 2016 « The Thinking Housewife
The Thinking Housewife
 

Women May Be in Combat in Britain by 2016

December 19, 2014

 

BREITBART has the story.

The Chief of the General Staff General Sir Nicholas Carter says:

If the research recommends that women are physiologically suited to close combat roles then we will be able to make as many ranks and roles open to all our soldiers, within a flexible career structure.

— -Comments —

Pete F. writes:

The transformation of the Great Britain into something Winston Churchill would not recognize – is now nearly complete. In complete disregard of Churchill’s entirely-too-prescient warnings a century ago vis-à-vis the dangers of Islam, Britain continues to import its would-be Muslim conquerors in ever-greater numbers. The steady flow of “immigrants” from Pakistan and other Muslim nations continues, despite a number of ominous and even horrific events which ordinarily would serve as warnings and portents of what is to come.

Eighteen months ago, British soldier Lee Rigby was beheaded in broad daylight on the streets of the nation in which he was born and for which he had volunteered to risk his life while in military service. His executioners, Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale, frankly admitted their devotion to Islam and that they had killed Rigby in accordance with their beliefs – but all mention of this was scrubbed from the official accounts, apart from the usual pro forma statements that these men were not representative of “true” Muslims.

It is clearly evident that Britain is being invaded by a hostile army, whether its leaders and opinion-makers wish to acknowledge that fact or not. Periodic outbreaks of what Michelle Malkin once aptly-called “sudden jihad syndrome” are simply Muslims doing what Muslims have always done when they colonize/conquer a new territory. One-thousand four-hundred years of history attest again and again to that truth.

Who will defend the Great Britain of the 21st century? In the past, the British could depend upon the “rough men” of whom George Orwell spoke, to defend the realm.

“People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.”

While the British military still has its share of rough men, today it looks increasingly like an advertisement for multiculturalism and diversity. Perhaps I am simply one of those misogynistic dinosaurs young people like to mock, but I cannot see the young, naïve and small-of-stature women pictured in your article being up to the job of opposing the soldiers of Allah, or the soldiers of anyone else, for that matter.

Perhaps, in the end, that is real point of leftist cultural Marxism – the replacement of the stalwart men who once stood on the walls of our civilization and defended it. Replacement by individuals – women, minorities, immigrants from the non-Anglophone world – more-receptive to the brave new world being created by the elites and the powers-that-be.

The slow-motion deconstruction of the west (what was once called Christendom) now happening in Britain and many other places besides, is of a piece with the feminization of the armed forces and the de facto invasion of western civilization.

For a very long time, Europe was entirely dependent on petroleum imported from the Middle East. It would indeed be interesting to know the extent to which the leaders of the west, i.e., in the European Union and in Great Britain, etc., have been co-opted by the enormous wealth of the Middle East – or forced to act against their own interests by the tremendous geopolitical and cultural leverage OPEC once possessed. Or are the elites of the west committing cultural and civilizational suicide entirely of their own volition – and simply dragging their unfortunate peoples along with them?

Regardless of how and why the old western world is disintegrating, it is disintegrating none-the-less. Not long ago, British opposition politician and nationalist Paul Weston was arrested for quoting Churchill’s “The River War,” specifically those passages which spoke of the nature of Islam. Something about hate speech and discrimination against minorities – the usual politically-correct rubbish. The nail which sticks up is always hammered the hardest.

Some three-quarters of a century ago, Winston Spencer Churchill helped save western civilization from the darkness of Nazism and fascism; today it is illegal to quote his words and speeches in the nation of his birth. One cannot help but wonder if the police officers who arrested him were female – or Muslim.

Laura writes:

The nation that Winston Churchill defended could not have withstood any of these developments. It had long since cut itself off from its spiritual roots. The disease is progressive and it was just a matter of time before it got much worse and the rule of social engineers and bankers was complete.

Please follow and like us: