IN REACTION to the French massacre, the entire Western world is calling for freedom of speech. But as Tiberge points out at Galliwatch, the very existence of large numbers of Muslim agitators in France is a result of the destruction of freedom of speech, not by terrorists but by the French elite:

Has it occurred to any of the apostles of freedom of speech that if there really were freedom of speech in France there would be no terrorism? Has it occurred to them that for forty years the French have been muzzled on behalf of the Muslims, and that the so-called freedom of speech they are “defending” today does not exist? Has it occurred to them that this is not really about freedom of speech at all? Are they trying to say that having fifteen million Muslims in their country is not a problem so long as they have “freedom of speech”? And since freedom of speech does NOT apply to the Front National or to the Catholics against moral depravity or to Identitarians fighting for their heritage, who is it that benefits from “freedom of speech”? Answer: The Muslims, the terrorists, and the pornocrats!

— Comments —

Mary writes:

My thoughts yesterday, after reading that all of our world’s leaders came to the same conclusion – the wholly insubstantial and false notion that this massacre was simply an attack on “freedom of speech” – were that if that’s all these great minds could come up with we’re in big trouble. Either they’re all idiots or “freedom of speech” is truly the idol of the modern world (or both). How dangerous. Something profound beyond words (mine anyway) is at stake. Islam knows this. This incident is one of what will be many more. They have watched our families break down and our faith weaken and by this have been emboldened to reignite the centuries-old war against their enemy, once magnificent and unstoppable: the West, created by God on the foundation of the natural order, which we persist in corrupting. Our nonsensical babble about “freedom of speech” only proves to Islam they are correct. We have lost any real sense of how freedom truly manifests itself.

My apologies if it’s too soon to say this: that “freedom of speech” itself was the undoing of the victims, for subversive publications usually exist not to uphold important universal principles but to undermine them. In the name of their idol they poked a rattlesnake and paid the ultimate price. The editor stated that he would rather die standing than live kneeling. I have no doubt he made that statement with passionate fervor for what he believed was something noble and grand but his publication did not reflect that nobility, and the fact is that the trouble started when France got off its knees. The French should march under banners reading: Repeupler Foyers Français ! Repeupler les Eglises de France! (more apologies, I used google: Repopulate French homes! Repopulate French Churches!). France can still be saved but will need a sane Catholic leader at the helm who will exhort them to help the Eldest Daughter of the Church earn back her title.

Perfesser Plum writes:

Free speech is hardly the threat.  Being shot, hammered, meat-cleaved, stabbed, butchered, gang rapped, enslaved, run over and blown to pieces are the issues–really, one issue; frenzied murder for which media elites provide rational explanations.  Drag them down the streets before the crowds; dip what’s left in hot epoxy resin in a public place of execution; hang them from gibbets. Put up billboards promising more of the same.  Blockade their rat hole areas of the city. Shoot on sight anyone who tries to leave.  Arrest (never to be seen again) public apologists.

Please follow and like us: