JACQUELINE writes:

This was written by the liberal online site Gawker on the landmark ruling:

“I can’t help but be happiest, though, about the defeat of the anti-marriage equality crusaders. The defeat of people who signed up to lose, who wasted their time and ours on a platform of animus and contempt. The defeat of people who put principle over the practical, who fought to preserve their limited understanding of an already imperfect institution over the actual human lives that would benefit from it. The defeat of people who did what bigots do: discriminate, vilify, fear-monger, argue irrationally and without respect to human dignity, and then bristle when they’re called out for what they are (bigots).

The jig is up. The world has turned and left you fuming, seething, weeping. F**k you, Mike Huckabee. F**k you, Bryan Fischer. F**k you, Maggie Gallagher. F**k you, Ben Carson. F**k you, Fox News. You should all feel like assholes because you are all assholes. And now you’re also, definitively, losers. And it feels incredible.”

Pretty much sums up the animosity of supporters towards the dissenters. This animosity isn’t new nor is it surprising. I predicted that this type of reaction will happen (it happened when Obama won his second term over Romney — homosexuals, on the site I was on, were scared of the country turning into a theocracy, so they came on to gloat).

While talking about an upcoming family wedding a month ago, I asked what church my cousin would be wed in, to which my brother – a homosexual – indignantly said, “Well, I can’t get married. The church won’t let me.” Another incident was similar, though a few years back. As we were driving to his apartment, located in the Boystown, Chicago’s “LGBT” neighborhood, he said to me, as I talked about possible locations in Europe to travel, “The world hates gays,” in reference to Russia.

He relocated to New York City. New York state allows civil unions between two people of the same sex. The state that he is from also, just recently before the ruling, allowed civil unions between two people of the same sex.

When he “came out” to me I did not reject him; I did not think much of it at that time. I was perfectly fine with it. When he came out to our parents they did not reject him. Our mother said, “You are my son. I will love you no matter what,” as she kissed his cheek.

At least for my brother, it wasn’t enough for family and close friends to accept him. It wasn’t enough to live in cities that were gay-friendly. It wasn’t enough that the state he lives in, and the state he moved away from, allows same-sex “marriage.” It wasn’t enough, during his drunken stupor, that I stayed silent as he talked about how much he liked “the cock.” The entire culture must change. That’s what I get from these memories. And my brother is not an activist. He is a working professional who so happens to be a homosexual. He is not really active in the LGBT “community” but he has rationalized open relationships and sees Dan Savage as a reasonable person. My brother would be considered conservative in the LGBT “community.”

This is a crazy analogy, but if there were any signs of Dylann Roof and his ilk that hinted to future killings, I think we should be vigilant when it comes to the LGBT and their demands. Will people like my brother see no use in “It Gets Better” since same-sex “marriage” is now law of the land? Will he still act indignant every time marriage comes up?  Yes and yes.This is all speculation, but within this speculation I feel these are the correct answers.  For him, the Catholic Church is the golden nugget.

He does not know his younger sibling is, in the eyes of modernity, a bigot. He does not know that his younger sibling, who once supported same-sex “marriage” (I was the straight who would’ve been considered an “Ally”) no longer does. I have not “come out” to him, and I do not think I should.

— Comments —

Mark Jaws writes:

How right Jacqueline is when she depicts the Catholic Church as The Big Kahoona.  In the minds of the militant atheist, which includes the homosexual lobby, the atheist Ashkenazi Elite, and the Communists, there is no greater target to bring down than The Catholic Church.  It is foolish for anyone of us to think that their endzone victory dance is over.   What Jacqueline’s brother and his ilk will demand next is the right to get married ANYWHERE.  And that my friends, will be when the cannonballs start landing on Fort Sumter.

Laura writes:

Another reader responds to Jacqueline here.

Please follow and like us: