Manufactured Dissent
September 4, 2015
IN his book Revolution from Above: Manufacturing ‘Dissent’ in the New World Order, Kerry Bolton writes about the tyranny of globalist capitalism and its monolithic control of our government and culture. His conclusion is especially relevant to the previous entry about Donald Trump. Notice how Bolton refers to the manipulative use of dialectics. The Trump campaign, I believe, is a good example of this “manufactured dissent.”
A self-appointed elite that Huxley called the ‘World Controllers’ and Carroll Quigley described as ‘an international network’ has for generations been intent on establishing a ‘World State’ (Huxley) or what David Rockefeller himself calls a ‘World Order,’ and what President George W. Bush and others, such as Rothschild employee Linnett, call the ‘New World Order.’ In more common parlance it is called ‘globalisation,’ but it is seldom understood in its wider ramifications, as set forth here, especially by the Left, whose activists support aspects of the same globalisation process: multiculturalism, feminism, marijuana liberalisation, abortion rights, open borders, and feel-good causes in the name of ‘democracy’ and ‘human rights,’ the results of which are further control by global plutocracy.
The Left, including the communists, have generally served as the ‘useful idiots’ of international capital, as Spengler observed eighty years ago, which in our own time has been empirically documented by Antony Sutton and confirmed by Carroll Quigley. The Left whether in its Fabian, communist, or New Left varieties has been appropriated by the System it is supposedly opposing. A post-New Left has emerged since the dissolution of the Soviet bloc, and takes the form of the so-called ‘colour revolutions’ under the direct, overt patronage of the Soros network, and others.
The strategy used by the international oligarchy is the same as that more generally recognised as being a major element in Marxist doctrine; namely dialectics, the conflict of opposing forces that generates a synthesis. This dialectal method is something that Sutton realised when he was trying to understand why the oligarchy so often seems to be backing opposing ideologies, governments, and policies. The Marxist dialecticians stated that history is engaged in a process towards world communism that would arise out of the conflict of capitalism and socialism. The oligarchs on the other hand apparently operate on the dialectical premise that what will result from their ‘controlled conflict’ will be a socialist-capitalist synthesis which we might call the ‘World Collectivist State’; a world order that will be communistic in organisation but run by oligarchs rather than commissars. Aaron Russo, after talking with Nick Rockefeller, alluded to this as ‘selling socialism as capitalism.’
Over the past few generations, the ‘crises scenarios’ used by the oligarchs to sell or impose their plan of a World Collectivist State have included the problems of war, famine, overpopulation, disparity between the wealth of the so-called ‘North’ and ‘South,’ and in our present time ‘the war on terrorism’ (perpetual conflict) and the threat of ‘global warming.’
In general it can be stated that many of these problems are the direct result of the debt-finance, trade and economic system that is operated by the oligarchs. Now the oligarchs presents themselves as the solvers of the problems of their own making. A global ‘pincer movement’ of agitation from ‘below’ (the ‘Left’) and manipulation from ‘above’ (the ‘oligarchs’) dialectically operates to shift the centre of mass political gravity towards an acceptance of, if not support for, a World State to end the crises that have been created by our self-appointed ‘world saviours.’ [Bold added.]
[Kerry Bolton, Revolution from Above: Manufacturing Dissent in the New World Order; Arktos, 2011]
