THIS Rosh Hashanah sermon by Rabbi Jeremy Gordon, of New London Synagogue in England, is quite a piece of work, a succinct statement if ever there was one of Jewish advocacy for the mass invasion of Europe by Middle Eastern refugees. The ordinary Jew, Gordon says, must not fear the radical transformation of Britain and other European nations. The refugees should be permanently accommodated because to do otherwise would be a betrayal of Jewish history. In the sermon, which is posted at the website of Support Refugees, a consortium of Jewish organizations offering assistance to the asylum seekers, Gordon explains:

We are in danger of forgetting that we are the people who are supposed to have the deepest understanding of the life of a Fiddler on the Roof; understanding the way in which people flee the country of their birth because staying is just too horrible a fate to wish upon our children is the deepest insight of our Jewish national memory. Loving the stranger is our central ethic. This is what it means to be a Jew. There may well be less Jews keeping Kosher than was the case a hundred years ago, and there may be less Jews here on Second Day Rosh Hashanah than was the case even thirty years ago, and I can live with all that. But I can’t live with this. I can’t live with the notion that the Jewish people have forgotten what it means to be Jews.

Loving the stranger is our central ethic. Gordon does not mention that the principles he advocates for Britain are not endorsed by Israel, which offers automatic asylum only to Jews. Why is Gordon not advocating the same policy for the Jewish homeland?  Nor does he mention that the brotherhood advocated by Maimonides is a brotherhood extended only to other Jews. Hating the stranger is closer to the central ethic of the Talmud, which even says it’s okay to murder, defraud and lie to gentiles.

— Comments —

Bruce B. writes:

“Why is Gordon not advocating the same policy for the Jewish homeland?”

I can at least somewhat understand Jews’ immigration hypocrisy when it comes to American immigration since America, right or wrong, is largely seen as a proposition nation and Israel is not. But England is an ethnic nation.

Bill R. writes:

You write, “Nor does he mention that the brotherhood advocated by Maimonides is a brotherhood extended only to other Jews.”

Indeed. Here is but one sample of what Maimonides had to say about non-Jews: “And why is it forbidden to deliver a female animal to a heathen woman? Because all heathen women are suspected of whoredom, and when her paramour comes to lie with her, it is possible that he will not find her at home and will lie with the animal instead. Indeed, even if he does find her, he may still lie with the animal.” (The Code of Maimondies, Book V: The Book of Holiness, XXII, 142).

So much for loving strangers.

Regarding Bruce B.’s comment, I would point out that the notion of America as a “proposition nation” is in itself largely the propaganda product of extremist Zionist Jews, and, given their overwhelming control of mass media in the West, the only reason (if it is) America is “largely seen” as such. But the fact is that, up until the Immigration Act of 1965, America remained as committed to its white European ethnic identity as any nation in Europe. This was reflected in every single immigration law that was passed in United States until then, from the very first in 1790 (mandating that an applicant for citizenship be a “free White person”) to the last in 1952, as well is in countless statements by some of our most celebrated presidents and politicians, and, finally, in the opinion of the overwhelming majority of American citizens during that entire period and beyond.

Laura writes:

One would think Jews would not support Muslim immigration given the current state of Muslim-Jewish relations.

In related news, George Soros admits to working to dissolve national borders in Europe.

Bill R. writes:

You write, “One would think Jews would not support Muslim immigration given the current state of Muslim-Jewish relations.”

They are nervous about Muslim immigration, but it has not yet reached proportions in the West that outweigh its “divide and conquer” advantages to them that come from the weakening and breakdown of the host population brought on by ever-increasing ethnic division (what they call the “strength” of our “diversity,” knowing full well, of course, it’s nothing of the kind).  The more ethnically divided the host population, the safer Jews tend to feel.  They feel stronger in their own intense ethnic unity as they see the host population around them disintegrate in ethnic disunity.  Ultimately, Jewish supremacists seek a situation in which, finally, no other ethnic group is strong enough to challenge them, and they are then able to seize complete control.  Should any of your readers be tempted to see this analysis as mere anti-Semitic paranoia, I would simply draw their attention to the degree of control in politics, finance, and the media that Jews already possess; it’s not at all far from complete right now.  But, frankly, they’re also greedy about it.  They’re never satisfied until they have the whole enchilada.  This is how the Jew inevitably overplays his hand, as he has done repeatedly throughout history, until the host population is finally so nauseated with the situation, it cannot help but throw him up and out.  This utterly natural and humane desire for a population to return control of its own destiny to its own people, rather than have it controlled by an alien ethnic group totally hostile to its interests — as a matter of their very religion, I might add — this the Jew is pleased to call “anti-Semitism.”  In any other, non-white European Gentile context, of course — for, say, a non-white society “victimized” by past Western “imperialism” — the Jew champions this desire and calls it a people’s “right of self-determination.”  We whites are not allowed any racial self-determination, of course, unless it is to maintain our role as the world’s principle villain while we’re in the process of committing racial suicide.  Meanwhile, it is a right Jews pursue for themselves with unrelenting ruthlessness and singularity of purpose in their own, stolen homeland.

Laura writes:

The ordinary Jew is not a Soros-style supremacist. He has been told that his people are the victims of irrational enmity and he must act aggressively to protect himself. He doesn’t have the whole enchilada and never will.

Absolute power corrupts. We live in a world in which power is concentrated. The root of the evil is our monetary system, which makes money a commodity in the hands of a few.

Please follow and like us: