USING the pretext of abolishing child marriage and improving education for women, two objectives which virtually no one would object to, the Ford Foundation inculcates Indian women into the globalist vision of life, detaching them from their traditions, their parents, their future husbands and a non-economic vision of life. Notice the steely glint at one point in Kajal’s eye. She is a lovely girl. And she is ready to be one more serf, one more Global Me. Her enlightened education includes “reproductive health,” an Orwellian term for promiscuity and sterility, and it probably sounds like liberation.

Who are the people at Ford to shape the family lives and control the births of Indians?

Feminism never was a grass roots movement. Without the support of the major tax-exempt foundations, built upon the great dynastic, Capitalist fortunes, those consciousness-raising sessions would have been inconsequential tea parties. The same process that occurred in America has been happening for many years all over the world. Ford, Rockefeller, Carnegie and the Open Society Institute, to name a few, push birth control, feminist lending, abortion and careerism in women, all of which prepare the way for a loss of national economic sovereignty to international finance. Patrick Buchanan wrote in 2002, and it is still true:

The old Marxists — Marx, Engels and the others — wanted to bring down the traditional family, and move women out of the home and into the marketplace, to make them independent of the family. The global capitalists want the same thing. Women who live at home are not consuming or producing enough, they think. Global capitalism seeks to make everyone an employee, everyone a worker. There is a tremendous premium on bringing into the marketplace talented and capable women workers — who are more reliable in many cases — so that they can boost productivity and consume more goods. (Patrick J. Buchanan interview, Right Now!, no. 35, April-June 2002).

With Indian women pulled from their homes, their children are ready to be inducted into global culture and consumerism. They are ready to be citizens of everywhere and nowhere.

Child marriage is not a good thing. Education for women is important. But poor Indians make a bargain with the devil when they accept these cultural imperialists into their towns.

— Comments —

Hurricane Betsy writes:

The old Marxists — Marx, Engels and the others — wanted to bring down the traditional family, and move women out of the home and into the marketplace, to make them independent of the family.

Well, for some time now, families have been pushing their young people of both sexes out the front door the moment they finish high school, forcing them to live alone, or worse, with one or two equally young and naive room mates, with all the problems that causes down the line. I simply don’t know any young person who has not gotten into trouble of one kind or another shortly after they were told to find their own place and way in life. It’s the latest fashion: get out; we fed you for 18 years, now feed yourself. Hatred for your own kids.

A few generations ago, only the most desperately poor families kicked their kids out. It was not a disgrace to live at home, provided you were useful one way or another, until you married.

John Purdy writes:

Hurricane Betsy writes: “families have been pushing their young people of both sexes out the front door the moment they finish high school,” This really does not seem to be the case in my experience. I see the opposite, even to an extreme. Young people are living with their parents well into their twenties and show no interest in becoming independent adults and paying their own way. I think this is worse than leaving at eighteen which at least forces some sense of reality into kids heads.

Please follow and like us: