THERE is reason to suspect that the person who emerged from Chelsea Clinton’s apartment on Sunday after Hillary Clinton’s collapse at a 9/11 memorial was not Hillary Clinton. The contrast was so noticeable that even the mainstream media has covered the story. The double was thinner than Hillary and was conspicuously not surrounded by body guards, as if a full view of her as healthy and not debilitated was desired. It is unlikely that she could have recovered this quickly (within 90 minutes), if she did indeed collapse. If this was a double, it had to have been arranged well in advance.

[Update: It couldn’t be a Hillary impersonator. The voice in this video is definitely that of Hillary.]

— Comments —

Linda from Chicago writes:

The talk about Hillary using a body-double the day of her most recent episode. With all this body-double speculation, there have been a number of photos floating around, both pro and con, allowing us to come to our own conclusions. Mine is that this was not a body-double. There are several side-by-side closeups of Mrs. Clinton’s face. If you look closely, she has a small colorless mole or bump on the righthand side of her upper lip (her righthand side). It’s been there forever, and it’s there on the alleged body double’s  lip too.

As for looking slimmer, it may be that without her bulletproof vest (and adult diaper, if you think that part is true), she would naturally appear less bulky, and her crusty pantsuit would hang much better.

The only thing that does puzzle me is the absence of Secret Service protection. Or perhaps they were just not a part of any of the photos I saw. And even as much as I dislike Hillary, I found that most recent video very upsetting and difficult to watch.

Please follow and like us: