The “Soft Coup”
December 10, 2016
WHERE is the evidence that Russia manipulated the election of Donald Trump?
The latest CIA report is an extraordinarily evil effort to delegitimize an election.
— Comments —
Steve writes:
This is treasonous action on the part of the CIA and the controlled media.
Here’s an article by Jason Ditz from AntiWar.com. An excerpt:
Indeed, that the CIA is not only suddenly involved, but suddenly at the forefront, may well reflect President-elect Trump’s stated policy intentions being far removed from those that the CIA has endorsed, and might be done with an eye toward undermining Trump’s position in those upcoming policy battles.
At the center of those Trump vs. CIA battles is Syria, as the CIA has for years pushed to move away from the ISIS war and toward imposing regime change in Syria. Trump, by contrast, has said he intends to end the CIA-Saudi program arming the Syrian rebels, and focus on fighting ISIS. Trump was even said to be seeking to coordinate anti-ISIS operations with Russia.
The CIA allegations could easily imperil that plan, as so long as the allegations remain part of the public discourse, evidence or not, anything Trump does with respect to Russia is going to have a black cloud hanging over it.
The Trump transition team issued a statement mocking the allegations, noting “these are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.” That’s indeed the case, though ominously these same people managed to drive American policy for years on end with those false allegations.
While the Obama Administration has insisted their own “full review” won’t change the outcome of the election, and indeed Obama aides suggested they won’t publicly release the results, the accusations seem set to last long after Trump’s inauguration, and have set the stage for a major battle between the next president and the CIA. [bold added]
Laura writes:
The CIA is attempting to delegitimize an incoming president and corrupt his foreign policy — not that Trump himself is headed in the right direction with his “Mad Dog” policy with regards to Iran.