JUDGING from the universal, ecstatic acclaim his death at the age of 85 has prompted in seemingly every organ of the major media, his highly cultivated image as a black-clad high priest, the hyper-extravaganzas he made of fashion shows, his Babylonian worship of his cat, his disordered sexuality, his political comments, his entourage of “Karl’s boys,” including a child — his “godson;” his closeness with the trashiest of celebrity idols, his disdain for “curvy” and “fat” women, his celebration of androgyny, his movies portraying repressive Europe giving birth to multiculturalism, material excess and orgies; his famous secrecy and his success in creating a global empire which throttled competitors, the fashion designer Karl Lagerfeld was an insider like few people are. He was certainly at the very apex of the sordid powers behind, and in front of, the scenes.

Did he make some beautiful and even feminine clothes in his lengthy career? Yes, he did.

Was he talented? Undeniably.

But Lagerfeld, who designed for Chanel and Fendi and made fashion lines for retailers such as Macy’s and H&M, also spread a true disdain for femininity and played a major part in creating the ugly, occult trampy-ness that is everywhere:

So enamored was he with the physique of the skinny, adolescent male, it is entirely plausible that many of Lagerfeld’s models in recent years weren’t women at all.  In any event, some of them certainly looked like men or boys in make up and dresses. The facial bone structure and body of Kristen McMenamy (strange name), to take one example, are highly masculine:

McMenamy’s alleged teenage daughter also became a model and has the torso and neck of a boy:

The Irish writer Jeremy James goes too far in saying that most of Lagerfeld’s recent models were transgenders, but they were certainly trans-looking. James writes:

The androgyne template – the new ideal of feminine beauty – is a sickening attack on women. Through it they are being duped into rejecting the grace and beauty of their God-given natural bodies. This is immensely pleasing to Satan, who hates natural women and must surely take great satisfaction in making them hate themselves.

The androgyne template presents natural women with at least 14 ‘impossibles’, bodily attributes that they cannot possibly hope to acquire but which they will nonetheless crave in their normal human quest for greater attractiveness:

1. Impossibly long necks
2. Impossibly long arms
3. Impossibly long legs
4. Impossibly thin arms
5. Impossibly thin legs
6. Impossibly high foreheads
7. Impossibly narrow hips
8. Impossibly narrow waists
9. Impossibly wide shoulders
10. Impossibly straight backs
11. Impossibly tight butts
12. Impossibly prominent cheek bones
13. Impossibly large eyes
14. Impossibly few curves.

He continues:

Ultimately the New World Order intends to produce a pseudo-female population of androgynes …

This is Satan’s version of Eve, an offensive parody of what God created in the beginning when He formed Eve from the body of Adam. Satan wants to copy God in every possible way, so he has taken man and made a ‘new woman’ from his flesh. In addition to her many disturbing attributes, this ‘new woman’ has no uterus. She cannot conceive and give birth to children. She is just the kind of ‘woman’ Satan wants – sterile, infertile, barren.

In the last half century he has tricked most countries in the world into introducing abortion on demand – the deliberate destruction of the fruit of the womb. He now wants to destroy the womb itself.

Even someone as powerful as Lagerfeld cannot defeat the great equalizer. But he leaves behind a fashion world that works for women but detests the natural woman. Like so much in our world, it is an inversion of what is beautiful and true.

Lagerfeld’s main backer at Chanel has been the very private pair of brothers, Alain and Gerard Wertheimer.

”There’s one divine person in the whole business, and that’s Alain Wertheimer. If it weren’t for him, it would never work. He and I made a pact, like between the Devil and Faust, and he is 100 percent behind me. So I can do what I like, when I think I should do it — even if the political or commercial idea is the opposite of what I should,” he said.

Please follow and like us: