AIPAC, the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee, has the power to make or break the careers of American politicians. Everyone in politics knows that. AIPAC’s friends bribe politicians. (It’s not “lobbying,” it’s bribery. It’s not a conspiracy, it’s in the open.) So why the storm over comments by Democrat Ilhan Omar? The pit bulls will not tolerate this knowledge becoming more widely known among the general public. If harmless small fry like Omar are allowed to state damaging facts many people already know, then the real truth-tellers might stand a chance.

AIPAC, and the other three dozen or so Israeli lobbying groups in Washington, should be registered as the agents of a foreign country, and politicians who work for Israel should move there. (The Israel lobby, which many Jews do not entirely support, also includes Christian Zionist groups.)

In related news, learn how hired Israeli manipulators (“hasbara”) influence debate on the Internet here.

What is an “anti-Semite?”

An “anti-Semite” is someone who has the nerve to cry out as he’s being attacked by Jewish control freaks. His cries of pain are “anti-Semitic tropes.”

Sometimes it seems that the problem with “anti-Semites” is not what they say, but that they dare to exist. That’s the problem with the Palestinians. They dare to exist.

Remember, your tax dollars fund genocidal violence:

See full-length movie here.

By the way, the just solution is not, as Noam Chomsky argues, a two-state solution, but one state.

— Comments —

Jon writes:

I am interested in your comment about the solution to Israel Palestine is one state, not two.  I assume you mean by this that Palestine should have a right to their own land once more.  Do you care to elaborate any more or have any links which would explore that?
It is interesting to me some of the problems caused by humanitarian, godless states, which co-op God’s law to serve the interests of certain groups.  How can righteous society be restored when they have upended society by their presumptions?  Yet it is God’s law and His word alone which can provide the solution.

I see the Civil Rights Movement this way, as the imposition of law to deny the rights of peoples to see themselves as a separate people, namely white Americans.  It seems to have caused many more problems than it ever fixed, and yet the idea of removing it is unthinkable to our society.  So what is to be done?

Laura writes:

I shouldn’t have used the word “solution,” because either one state or two can’t be a solution if the area is under Jewish, Muslim or secular rule. Perhaps you are saying the same thing? Anyway, I don’t see how two states could survive given the aggression of the settlers and Israeli preemptive strikes. The “two-state solution” presumes equal claim to the area by both Arabs and Jews. The Arabs who were displaced have a greater claim to it. It seems only just that some of the land be restored to them. But Zionism would have to be totally defeated for Jewish communities to live alongside Muslim communities. Seems inconceivable … but then every possibility seems inconceivable. Israel Shamir’s book Cabbala of Power got me thinking about the one-state idea. I can’t endorse everything he says, but he makes sense on that point.

So what is to be done?

The solution has to be spiritual. We are rootless without God. And multiculturalism is the ultimate manifestation of rootlessness.

Please follow and like us: