Web Analytics
She’d Be Better Off at Home « The Thinking Housewife
The Thinking Housewife
 

She’d Be Better Off at Home

October 13, 2020

AMY CONEY BARRETT is guilty of complicity in a lie.

She has clearly demonstrated, as we can see here, her lack of respect for the truth. A public official has much greater responsibility than the ordinary person.

The brutal truth is, no one in government is on our side. The black mask fits our leaders. They’re just highway robbers.

By the way, has the virus even been proven to exist?

Jon Rappoport writes:

The CDC document is titled, “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel.” It is dated July 13, 2020.

Buried deep in the document, on page 39, in a section titled, “Performance Characteristics,” we have this: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…”

The key phrase there is: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available…”

Every object that exists can be quantified, which is to say, measured. The use of the term “quantified” in that phrase means: the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus, because it is unavailable. THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS.

A further tip-off is the use of the word ‘isolates.” This means NO ISOLATED VIRUS IS AVAILABLE.

Another way to put it: NO ONE HAS AN ISOLATED SPECIMEN OF THE COVID-19 VIRUS.

NO ONE HAS ISOLATED THE COVID-19 VIRUS.

THEREFORE, NO ONE HAS PROVED THAT IT EXISTS.

— Comments —

Marky Mark writes:

I heard a snippet or two of ACB on the radio yesterday; I was NOT impressed! She’s little better than Gloria Steinem, Bella Abzug, or other obnoxious feminist from the 1970s. It was her introductory speech to the Judiciary Committee, and she was going on about how girls could do anything guys could do, etc. Between her demeanor, her feminism, and her putrid rulings, I can only say this: why on earth did Pres. Trump nominate her for SCOTUS?! Why? I had a bad feeling about her from the beginning; hearing her and reading Robert Barnes’ summary of her judicial opinions only confirmed my initial bad feeling about ACB.

BTW, I think that all the hullabaloo about her is a distraction, and that both parties are in on it. By throwing up these sophisticated distractions; by engaging in what appears to be sophisticated kabuki theater; the people’s eyes are being taken OFF her odious, unconstitutional judicial opinions. I think that the same applied to Justice Kavanaugh too, because we were distracted from HIS weakness on the Fourth Amendment, his role in crafting the abominable USA PATRIOT Act, etc. We, the people, are being distracted yet again from the serious issues concerning liberty and the Constitution.

Those are my thoughts…

Laura writes:

Thank you. I agree.

Here is the text of Barrett’s opening statement. In addition to approvingly repeating “girls can do anything boys can do better,” she said:

When I was 21 years old and just beginning my career, Ruth Bader Ginsburg sat in this seat. She told the Committee, “What has become of me could only happen in America.” I have been nominated to fill Justice Ginsburg’s seat, but no one will ever take her place. I will be forever grateful for the path she marked and the life she led.

“Loyal Reader” writes:

I agree with you and poster Marky Mark.  There is an immense rush to hurry and have the hearings and confirmation.  The rush has nothing to do with Democrats’ appearance of protestation – it is intended to create a momentum to gloss over all ACB’s warts.  The mask is odious- a Supreme Court justice nominee should, of all people, have enough backbone to refuse to submit to this unconstitutional overreach.  The “science” behind the mask, as well as its unconstitutionality, have been exposed and overruled in several States already.  Like so many things, we keep being treated to the “act now, before the opportunity goes away forever” fallacy in order to impose ever more tyranny.  This time, the tyranny will be in place for a long time.  I suspect she is a female John Roberts.

Her children look happy, but perhaps that is because they have a privileged life?

She should stay home and take care of her children.

Please follow and like us: