A READER writes:

Here is an interesting article about E. Michael Jones which might explain some of his strange views about race and Western civilization. I’ve never heard of Andy Sloan, but I detected no major errors in this article. Mr. Jones could just be a very naive dupe, but Mr. Sloan makes that seem unlikely.

— Comments —

John E. writes:

If EMJ is a crypto-Jew, then this is a strange phenomenon similar to what our Lord mentioned in the Gospels as an untenable house divided.  If EMJ is working for the Jews, as a Jew, then he is working against himself as far as I am concerned, as I have been made aware of Jewish diabolical work in the world, and come to reject it, only with his help in bringing it to light.

Laura writes:

That would be quite astounding if he was.

For now, I’m assuming he is not.

Jones is a brilliant man and seems likable. I have met him a few times. He came to our home for dinner and I  found him sincere and personable. I am grateful for his promotion of important ideas, especially the idea that sexual liberation is a form of political control, and for his phonebook-sized books.  But he has also been promoting serious errors for some time, not just on race, Islam and foreign policy, but especially with regard to the Church and Vatican II. He seems to support some of the big lies of World War II also and has not, as far as I know, defended those scholars thrown in jail for “revisionism.”

Mr. Sloan has done serious research here. He has brought much to light and his concerns are well-founded. I don’t think he has proven that Jones is a “KGB asset,” but he has made it seem within the realm of possibility. It’s very disturbing and I hope Mr. Jones answers these charges directly. He seems to have evaded the issues when asked.

Mar. 25, 2021

John E. writes:

In this recent interview EMJ gave, he addresses a question from someone in the audience about his involvement with Alexander Dugin, as well as the charges about his being a KGB agent.  It is right around the 1:11:30 mark.

He does not evade the question in the least, and I found his answer to be in keeping with what I have grown accustomed to in the many hours of interviews I have listened to of his, mostly while commuting to and from work.  That is, I have never known him to evade any question asked with even the slightest semblance of good faith.  He stands out to me in fact, perhaps more than anyone else living I can think of, as one who addresses things head on fearlessly.

Please follow and like us: