JOHN GIDEOMN HARTNETT writes:

In this video clip (9m:17s) Dr David [Martin] explains that the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA experimental medical products are actually a medical device. They are neither a vaccine nor a therapeutic agent. (See partial transcript below.)

It is a totally new device, where a piece of RNA is encapsulated inside a ball of fat and injected into the muscle of the recipient. The device then co-ops the body’s cell machinery to manufacture the spike protein of the coronavirus.

The theory goes that the body’s immune system then responds to make making antibodies against the disease. But effectively the technique is giving the recipient a form of the disease that is endogenously made. (It is not surprising that many of the trial recipients got China virus symptoms after their first shot.)

He said it doesn’t even come close to the definition of a vaccine. A vaccine is meant to 1) rev up the immune system thus producing immunity to the disease, and, 2) interrupt transmission of the disease.

Read more.

According to Pierre Escaudron,

Despite its name, the Pfizer ‘vaccine’ is more akin to gene therapy, the definition of which is: “the utilization of the therapeutic delivery of nucleic acids into a patient’s cells”. The Pfizer “vaccine” is exactly that, an artificial RNA sequence delivered via nano lipids into the patient’s cells, to hijack them and direct them to produce the spike protein found on SARS-CoV-2, or at least on one of its old variants. From there, the host should react to this protein by producing antibodies. Too many antibodies and an immune storm happens, not enough antibodies and the triggered immunity is useless.

Notice that gene therapy was never used on a large scale. It was only used in experimental phase 1 anti-tumoral protocols. The drugs were so toxic that phase 2 trials were never conducted. RNA “vaccines” against MERS and SARS followed the same path of failure

In 1999, geneticist Alain Fischer, conducted the first clinical trial with some rare positive results in the world of gene therapies. The same Alain Fischer was nominated as a vaccine expert by the French authorities. When asked about the Pfizer ‘vaccine’, Fischer answered cautiously, emphasizing that the effects of infectiousness and the duration of immunity were unknown, side effects were unavoidable and the fear of the vaccine was understandable. Obviously Fischer’s analysis didn’t fit the pro vaccine narrative, since then he no longer enjoys any media exposure.

Please follow and like us: