IN ITS protocols for trials of its COVID vaccine, the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer acknowledged that the vaccine could cause birth defects. It admitted this by requiring study participants to abstain from sexual activity for a month afterward and by eliminating women who are possibly pregnant from the study.

On page 132 of the trial protocols, we find this:

10.4. Appendix 4: Contraceptive Guidance 10.4.1.

Male Participant Reproductive Inclusion Criteria

Male participants are eligible to participate if they agree to the following requirements during the intervention period and for at least 28 days after the last dose of study intervention, which corresponds to the time needed to eliminate reproductive safety risk of the study intervention(s):

• • Refrain from donating sperm.

PLUS either:

• • Be abstinent from heterosexual intercourse with a female of childbearing potential as their preferred and usual lifestyle (abstinent on a long-term and persistent basis) and agree to remain abstinent.

OR • Must agree to use a male condom when engaging in any activity that allows for passage of ejaculate to another person.

• • In addition to male condom use, a highly effective method of contraception may be considered in WOCBP partners of male participants (refer to the list of highly effective methods below in Section 10.4.4).

10.4.2. Female Participant Reproductive Inclusion Criteria

A female participant is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and at least 1 of the following conditions applies:

• • Is not a WOCBP (see definitions below in Section 10.4.3).

OR • Is a WOCBP and using an acceptable contraceptive method as described below during the intervention period (for a minimum of 28 days after the last dose of study intervention).

The investigator should evaluate the effectiveness of the contraceptive method in relationship to the first dose of study intervention. The investigator is responsible for review of medical history, menstrual history, and recent sexual activity to decrease the risk for inclusion of a woman with an early undetected pregnancy.

The question then arises:

If it was possibly dangerous to conceive for a month after being injected with the drug and if there have not been longterm studies on people who have conceived after taking the drug, how do they know in such a short time that it is safe?

Also, given the risks, in what way is it reasonable for this drug to be considered as a remedy for an alleged virus that has never even been isolated in a lab and that has a more than 99 percent survival rate?

I know — we should automatically trust Operation Warp Speed and a pharmaceutical company that has already been caught committing unprecedented criminal fraud.

Please follow and like us: