MIDWIN CHARLES, a 47-year-old CNN legal analyst, bragged of receiving her first dose of the Pfizer COVID shot on March 1. Charles, who had asthma, would have been due for her second dose around March 22.

She stopped posting to her busy Twitter account on March 24th, and was dead by April 6th. Her family did not reveal cause of death in a public statement. The mainstream media has entirely ignored the possibility that she died from the shots.

If Charles’s death, the announcement of which may have been purposely delayed, was a result of the injections, it did not result from an act of nature, but from willful and reckless human actions. She was not entirely without blame if her own death was caused by her willing participation in a medical experiment. As one doctor has put it, “taking the COVID injection is an act of extreme and reckless self-destruction.”

But this is more than possible self injury. The shots are administered by medical practitioners. Each and every death or injury from the COVID “vaccines” (they are not really vaccines) — and there have been many thousands of deaths around the world — is a crime, not an accident. The vaccinated are not facing imminent death from the disease at the time of injection and in most cases are healthy. The disease itself, if in fact it exists as a distinct disease rather than as a group of conditions, has a very high survival rate.

The first rule of ethical medical practice is Do no harm. 

The drugs are experimental, have not received full clinical trials (similar substances were fatal in all animal trials) and the doctors, nurses, government and medical administrators involved in vaccination know all this. (See facts about studies and risks, including long-term risks, here.)

They have violated the foundational principle of medical practice and should be liable for criminal charges or civil suits. The fact that they won’t face charges does not remove their complicity in medical malpractice, including harm to those with current or future side effects.

Millions of people have received these injections and suffered no immediate serious side effects. So what? Millions of people smoke cigarettes and never get cancer. Would it be okay if doctors recommended universal smoking? Would it be okay if employers required smoking? Millions of people have been in cars without air bags. Would it be okay if the government outlawed air bags?

We must add one more group of people who are complicit, without suggesting they have committed crimes. And that is the ordinary people who have broadcast their enthusiastic support for these experimental and potentially harmful drugs without any acknowledgement to others of the risks, especially of the gene-therapy technology involved, or the fact that these shots have not undergone full and impartial review. It’s not that they want them for themselves that’s the problem, but they want them for others and will bully or pressure others to get them. Except in the case of those with mental limitations (and it’s not for us to judge the mental capacity of anyone), their gullibility, lack of concern for others and mental laziness are inexcusable. It seems in some cases, the shots are viewed as medical talismans or magic potions that take away fear and risk of death. The faith in them is superstitious. We do not live in a scientific age, but in an age of medical alchemy, bringing high technology, laboratory potions and mysticism together.

I sincerely hope no serious long-term harm comes to those who have received these supposed vaccines. I hope the projections of dire harm are entirely alarmist, but I also hope many people decline to take that chance.

Please follow and like us: