ALAN writes:

The COVID “menace” is a myth involving relabeling, the hypostatizing of mysterious entities manufactured entirely out of the blue, naive and wholly unwarranted trust in doctors, and the false attribution to a single cause of myriad effects and occurrences arising from unrelated causes.

None of the COVID folderol is about health, medicine, or science.  It is about power, plain and simple.  It is a Communist-engineered, innocent-sounding pretext for unprecedented seizure of power and destruction of liberty and rights.  The only thing new is the medical-sounding pretext.

The COVID Fraud also offers wonderful opportunities for nobodies to become busybodies by joining the Mask Police Patrol, a job that enables them to stand around gawking at people, scolding them, barking out orders, and pushing people around – a veritable fiesta for petty tyrants.  I see them do this every week in St. Louis.

Much has been said about the life-destroying and health-destroying effects of so-called “vaccines” for that fake menace.  That is certainly a proper concern, especially when thousands of unwitting victims have learned it the hard way.

But there is a more fundamental concern:  The right to say NO; the right to choose; the right to discriminate; the right to be let alone.  These are among our inalienable rights.  We have them because we are human beings, not because government “gives” them to us.

Those of us who stand apart from the crowd know that our lives, our minds, and our bodily health are not State property or any business — except by our free, un-coerced choice — of the government, our neighbors, pushy salesmen, “society”, or racketeering doctors.

To all such thugs, tyrants, and busybodies, we must say NO firmly and unapologetically and make it stick:  NO to their lies, NO to their slickly-crafted brainwashing, NO to their poisons called “vaccines.”

The importance of saying NO is what Mike Royko had in mind when he addressed a similar concern in 1988.  Regarding intrusive, repeated, and unwanted telephone calls from solicitors, he wrote:

       “Is there no defense against these pests?  Because we have telephones, must we accept being interrupted and hassled by people trying to sell us what we don’t want or need?  Must we be at the mercy of this enormous growth industry—telemarketing—which is making billions of nuisance phone calls a year…?”

The solution he discovered was in Mr. Robert Bulmash, a paralegal who dealt with telephone solicitors by taking them to court.

            “Most people don’t have Bulmash’s legal savvy or his tenacity,” Royko wrote.  “So he’s starting a business in which he will represent people who don’t want junk phone calls.   …he’s doing this as much for principle as profit.”

Mr. Bulmash said:  “The right of privacy is what I’m concerned about.  The right to be left alone.  Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis once said that the right to be left alone is the most comprehensive of rights and the one most valued by civilized men.  Nowhere is that right more important than at home.  Com-mercialization isn’t going to chase me out of my house.”

      [Mike Royko, “How To Ditch a Sales Pitch,” St. Louis Post-Dispatch, July 26, 1988.  See also: Mike Royko, “Readers Reach Out To Stop Junk Calls,” Chicago Tribune, Aug.1, 1988]

Mr. Brandeis also wrote:  “Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the government’s purposes are beneficent….”

As a matter of course, whenever the gov’ment claims its purposes are beneficent, I take it as more likely than not that its purposes are diabolically evil.

Nuisance phone calls were a minor annoyance compared with Communist tyranny repackaged and promoted as healthcare.

Where today are men who — like Mr. Bulmash in 1988 — understand principle and will defend ordinary, law-abiding Americans’ right to be let alone against monsters like Biden, Fauci and their Communist comrades-in-racketeering-and-mendacity?

         “The capricious intrusion of the state into our daily lives has become an intolerable nuisance.  The question is whether we have the collective will to stop it before it blossoms into something even worse.”

           — Roger Kimball, “The police state, coming soon to a neighborhood near you”, PJ Media, Jan. 18, 2013

The answer quite obviously is that Americans did not and do not have the will — i.e., the spine, the moral courage, the metaphysical understanding of evil — to stop it.  They have thus allowed it to blossom into something even worse:  The Therapeutic State, whose arbitrary and unchecked powers are administrated not by philosopher-kings but by doctor-kings. The enemy we face today includes a coalition of professional racketeers, power-hungry doctors, frauds, opportunists, mythmakers, and tier upon tier of entrenched bureaucrats.

Unless we oppose them with iron determination, moral certitude, and legally-constituted force in self-defense, those thugs and their flunkies will extinguish that right — our most valuable right — along with our other rights, our right to privacy, our right of free association, and the sanctity of our homes.

When doctors—ostensibly men of science—agree to align themselves with the State, they achieve two things:

(1) They forfeit whatever claim to credibility they may have had before they made that choice; in a free society, medical services and products must be offered in an open marketplace where potential customers or “patients” are absolutely free to accept them, purchase them, or reject them and, if necessary, to advise aggressive doctors or medical racketeers to take a long walk off a short pier; and (2) They guarantee that ordinary, law-abiding people who want only to live responsibly, mind their own business, and be left alone by zealous do-gooders are in store for a double dose of Tyranny that its perpetrators will call “help.”

— Comments —

Hurricane Betsy writes:

In that little circular chart at the top of the article was “slight re-open”.

That would fit right into Biderman’s Chart of Coercion (commie methods to break a person’s or population’s will).   Maybe you have seen this, or even published it here?  If so, I missed it.

(Never mind the Amazing Polly video.)

There’s other sites with some good commentary on the connection between Biderman’s observations/analysis & the Corona 19 tyranny compliments of our rulers.  By the way, do you think they are suffering a psychotic break or are they demonic entities?

Laura writes:

I don’t think they are psychotic, but psychopathic, yes. And demonic too.

Please follow and like us: