IT IS not possible to say that there has been a specific disease called Covid-19 (or any variant of that disease) because there is no — and never has been — an accurate test for such a disease. The clinical symptoms mimic other flus, pneumonias and respiratory conditions. Environmental factors such as the cyclical build-up of airborne pollutants, pre-existing health problems and unusual medical treatments, especially the use of mechanical ventilators and extreme social isolation and panic, have not been scientifically ruled out as causes of  deaths and respiratory conditions in certain geographic areas.

I say all this not based on personal feeling or speculation, but on basic study. I am not a scientist but I am able to read the work of scientific journalists and it is my obligation to do this basic study (not that it matters to anyone). I do not need to be an expert to conclude that the science behind Covid-19 is very poor.

PCR tests are scientifically meaningless. The Nobel Prize-winning scientist who invented the test said they should never be used for the purpose for which they are currently being used.

This is not to say people are not sick nor is it to deny anyone who is sick great sympathy and the best of care. But you should not say, “I had Covid-19” or “I think I have Covid-19.” There is no scientific basis for you or any doctor making such a statement.

Below is a succinct summary from an unnamed medical scientist, but there are many other medical professionals who have said the same thing in the past two years. I also recommend the dozens of articles on the PCR test at Off-Guardian, especially this article by medical journalist Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter.

If you remember the PCR works by amplifying minute amounts of DNA. It therefore is useless at telling you how much virus you may have. And that’s the only question that really matters when it comes to diagnosing illness. Everyone will have a few virus kicking round in their system at any time, and most will not cause illness because their quantities are too small. For a virus to sicken you you need a lot of it, a massive amount of it. But PCR does not test viral load and therefore can’t determine if it is present in sufficient quantities to sicken you.

If you feel sick and get a PCR test any random virus DNA might be identified even if they aren’t at all involved in your sickness which leads to false diagnosis.

And coronavirus are incredibly common. A large percentage of the world human population will have covi DNA in them in small quantities even if they are perfectly well or sick with some other pathogen.

Do you see where this is going yet? If you want to create a totally false panic about a totally false pandemic – pick a coronavirus.

They are incredibly common and there’s tons of them. A very high percentage of people who have become sick by other means (flu, bacterial pneumonia, anything) will have a positive

PCR test for covi even if you’re doing them properly and ruling out contamination, simply because covis are so common.

There are hundreds of thousands of flu and pneumonia victims in hospitals throughout the world at any one time.

All you need to do is select the sickest of these in a single location – say Wuhan – administer PCR tests to them and claim anyone showing viral sequences similar to a coronavirus (which will inevitably be quite a few) is suffering from a ‘new’ disease.

Since you already selected the sickest flu cases a fairly high proportion of your sample will go on to die.

Cont.

Please follow and like us: