IN a new, televised interview, Melinda Gates (now rebranded as Melinda French Gates) suggests that her husband’s friendship with Jeffrey Epstein was a factor in her recent decision to seek a divorce.

I previously wrote about the divorce of Melinda and Bill:

I could care less about the alleged divorce of these two nauseating, murderous megalomaniacs with their poisoned needles. Did people in Soviet gulags take a sincere interest in the love life of Stalin? I hope not. The Gates Divorce is like the Meghan and Harry story — soap opera slop revolving around two vile creatures. Reading it is like handling slime. I believe this story is intended to boost the heterosexual creds of the eugenicist Bill Gates. Oh, what a lothario he is with his corporate exec girlfriend!! I suspect far more sinister predilections for this effeminate friend of pedophilia-pusher Jeffrey Epstein.

But even so, I am interested in the power and influence of these shady characters.

We can’t trust anything the Gates’s say, so heavily is their image managed. But we can read between the lines.

And listening to the interview, with its teary, feminist cliches, I realized that this divorce was necessary in order to protect the Gates’s global “philanthropic” schemes.

Bill’s friendship with Epstein cast a pall over one of the major boasts of Bill and Melinda: their concern for the rights of women. The recent trial of Ghislaine Maxwell provided all too many details of Epstein’s conception of women’s rights.

How could the Gates’s liberation of the women of the world go on if the couple remained together?

Now that Melinda has expressed her abhorrence of Epstein and left Bill, she is free to move ahead with their joint agenda of “empowering women.” That means encouraging them in every way to pursue life outside the family. That means worldwide distribution of pharamceutical contraceptives, encouragement of abortion, and efforts to undermine the male provider through anti-male discrimination in lending. “Empowering women” looks suspiciously like empowering global financiers, for whom large, traditional families stand in the way of reducing every human being to a tax-paying, fully employed, debt slave.

In light of this interview and Melinda’s ongoing claim to be an advocate of women, this 2012 “Open Letter to Melinda Gates” by the Nigerian woman Obianuju Ekeocha is worth reading:

I trained and worked for almost five years in a medical setting in Africa, yet I never heard of the clinical term “postpartum depression” until I came to live in Europe. I never heard it because I never experienced or witnessed it, even with the relatively high birth rate around me. (I would estimate that I had at least one family member or close friend give birth every single month. So I saw at least 12 babies born in my life every year.)

Amidst all our African afflictions and difficulties, amidst all the socioeconomic and political instabilities, our babies are always a firm symbol of hope, a promise of life, a reason to strive for the legacy of a bright future.

In an addendum to her letter, Ekeocha noted the political reality in Africa:

Anyone who follows closely the news from the African continent would immediately be struck by the ease with which dictators, military commanders and criminal warlords pop-up across our continent. This is so hard for most Americans or Europeans to relate to, but we must bear in mind that most Africans have been and are still living under dictatorial governments that span decades. In our African reality, whoever is in charge wields a god-like power which cannot easily be challenged. And in my experience, most of these men who manage to climb into positions of power want wealth for themselves. They spend only a portion of the national wealth on the people, and then ‘keep the change’ for themselves.

One factor that gets in their way is the increased populations in the different countries. They have more people to feed and fund thanks to our relatively high birth rates, so in this way the natural female fertility becomes a stumbling block to them.

For bringing African and other developing countries fully into usury-based modern economies controlled by central banks, the work of Melinda Gates is necessary and fundamental. Traditional family structure and high birthrates prevent the tax and employment paradigms favored by the central banks. This isn’t about women’s liberation. It’s about political control.

Melinda is now supposedly liberated from Bill. As I wrote before:

Gates could use her tremendous wealth to help people support families (why, she could even do that in America, of all places). She could give cash grants to married women with four or more children. She could give grants to men who are supporting their families on little. What a difference she could make. What a message of affirmation and hope she could send to the world.

Instead, as a woman seeking to prevent other women from having children, as a philanthropist ostensibly driven by a presumptuous belief that poverty can be obliterated, she promotes a bleak creed of negation.

— Comments —

Sara writes:

I am listening now to French Gates. Seems suitable to leave out her (his?) first name, and I have to say that time has not been kind to outward appearances…perhaps because no inner beauty radiates. It is painful to listen to a pathological liar, so I am going to turn it off half way through. I don’t need to hear more.

I simply abhor the evil that Gates and French Gates stand for: vaccine fraud, destruction of family values, desecration of the value of all life. There are no words for the level of my disgust. Both Gates and French Gates need to be behind bars. Perhaps “The Gates of Hell” has more meaning than I previously realized.

Laura writes:

I understand you’re not wanting to watch it.

The change in Melinda’s appearance over the years has provoked much comment on the Internet. In the recent CBS interview, you can see earlier snapshots of her and the same concerns apply.

I wrote before:

…[A]lmost ten years ago, I viewed many pictures of her online. I distinctly remember her face. I was startled last year to observe that the Melinda Gates of today looks distinctly different from the pictures I saw then, many of which have apparently been altered or scrubbed on the Internet.

She now looks manly, with a huge schnozzle, big chin, bushy eyebrows and beefy calves. She looks like just the sort of tranny who would hate the natural order and babies in their cribs. Maybe lying has just transformed her. They say it makes the nose grow.

We can’t know whether, as you say, inner changes have transformed her for the worse, which is entirely possible, or whether this is not Melinda Gates.

Anyway, she was previously a pretty woman, but now she — or whoever — is living testament to the fact that billions can’t buy beauty.

Laura adds:

I also believe Bill Gates has been deliberately set up as an arch-villain (which is not to to say he isn’t really evil) and that he may ultimately “take one for the team.”

This interview would fit in with that possibility.

Terry Morris writes:

Now that she’s successfully freed herself from that monster Bill and the constraints imposed upon her and all women by marriage, she should probably set her sights on becoming the first philanthropic feminist gazillionairess to climb Mt. Everest or K2 without the aid of supplemental oxygen, or something like that. You go, girl!

Please follow and like us: