— Comments —

Kathy G. writes:

I’ve not really followed Swift, but I’ve always thought there was something odd there. Very skinny, tall, yet so “girlie” and always made up. I learned in a genetics class in college that men and women have very different arm anatomy. If you can see their arms in a palm outward facing position, a female arm will angle outward away from the body from the elbow. The male arm goes straight down, no angle. This is why girls carry their books across their chests, and guys carry theirs down at their sides. God formed women to carry babies. Most of these homosexual males dressing as women are careful to bend their arms at the elbow and to keep their palms facing their bodies. It’s a giveaway. And it’s probably another reason male swimmers are so much better than female, the arm anatomy is so different.

Laura writes:

Interesting. I didn’t know that about the arms.

Photos of Taylor as a child and adolescent sure look like those of a boy with long hair. Taylor (a man’s name) also shows no inclination toward motherhood in songs or behavior. The idea of Swift being maternal is unthinkable. If she were really a woman, given the love ardor of her songs, she would have been married and had children by now.

Taylor is a bioweapon (vulgarity warning), according to Mr. E. “Transgenderism” is mass population reduction. That’s why Taylor Swift is so heavily promoted — the creation of a publicity machine and its occult agenda.

Josh F. writes:

With all due respect, do not be fooled by this “incel” subversion which cynically plays on Christian sexual morality. If you watch these videos again, you should recognize this in-your-face subversion which, much like the trans-movement itself, seeks to destroy the natural relationship between boy and girl and man and woman. Watch once again and notice how emphatically the narrator exclaims that Taylor Swift is a “MAN.” Even IF one would concede that Taylor Swift was born a male IN NO WAY can one then claim she is a “MAN.” And even if one concedes that Taylor Swift has no maternal instinct and therefore isn’t a “woman,” this does not at all suggest she is then a “MAN.” One thing I learned from Mr. Auster was concerning the precision and particularity of the words used to describe reality and how the radicals denied the transcendent yet readily used language infused with a transcendent essence. This perverted and erroneous use of the word “man” where “male” is the correct term suggests its own subversion of Reality.

Josh adds:

As a follow up, I’ll just say that neither video makes the case. I don’t know what kind of males the narrator hangs out with, but none that I have ever seen have the figure of a Taylor Swift. To claim she has “broad shoulders” or some kind of male arms is just not at all shown in any pictures in the videos. Even the evidence for the claim of plastic surgery to hide a male face just isn’t there. Has this narrator ever seen a real tranny or the effects of plastic surgery? Now, no doubt, there is an agenda to deceive. And no doubt, IF Taylor Swift was actually born a male and passed off as a female quite successfully through what would have to have been a life long deception starting some twenty plus years ago… Well, it still does not make “her” a “man.” And, assuming the scandal, the deception cannot really be understood as fooling men into desiring other “men.” No one is desiring Taylor Swift as a “man” even if “she” was born a male.

Please follow and like us: