EVERY day of the week in America, people are sadly killed in violent crimes.

These ordinary deaths usually receive no intense media coverage lasting for days on end. The public is not pummeled with the details, almost as if they were being systematically traumatized themselves. There are no instantaneous public expressions of grief by politicians or community-wide, televised candlelit vigils. There are no immediate calls on national television for legislative action and new security measures. These crimes often involve reckless or inexpert use of guns. There are no socially awkward and clumsy teenagers displaying the sort of Rambo-style marksmanship even highly-trained and fit members of the military would find difficult to replicate.

As I learned in the years when I was a newspaper reporter covering violent crime, family members and witnesses are devastated. They sometimes cry uncontrollably. They can barely speak or talk coherently. They experience intense shock, particularly if they have witnessed violence and bloodshed. They cannot put into words their trauma or fear in the very first moments after a violent crime, let alone smile repeatedly, as the famous Robbie Parker did at a nationally publicized press conference after his daughter was allegedly gunned down in a quiet, suburban school, just before the president interrupted his schedule and flew in for photo ops.

Always ask yourself when a big story emerges with lots of accompanying political hoopla, “Does anyone benefit?” and “Is my instinctive compassion being manipulated?”

Guns can be put to bad (murder) or good (self defense) use. But lies, especially systematic lies, are never good and can break the moral compass of a society. Terrorizing millions of children with mass coverage of allegedly horrifying crimes in schools is child abuse. My interest in this subject is primarily motivated by concern for the psychological damage done by terror propaganda.

Since the Obama administration (see video below), it has been lawful in the United States for the federal government to engage in domestic propaganda events (i.e., public deception) to combat “extremism.” Given this documented fact, it is not absurd or ridiculous for some to claim that, due to strange anomalies in certain events, the government is doing just that or that generously compensated citizens would participate in deception and even consider their participation virtuous, especially given that it is legal.

From Sandra on Gab (with slight editing) comes this list of signs of a staged shooting event:

“1. An illogical and clearly scripted narrative.

2. The AR -15 ‘assault rifle,’ i.e., ‘weapons of war’.

3. The gun control agenda, the mental health agenda and new policies regarding security immediately pushed.

4. A vigil held mere hours later, with more in next few days.

5. Crisis actors delivering scripted statements alongside quips, such as, ‘I thought it was a drill’, ‘I thought it was fake’, while laughing and smiling.

6. Immediate response time from multiple agencies including the ATF, the FBI, and all the usual suspects.

7. Go Fund Me accounts sometimes posted before the event; always on day of event.

8. Involvement with Victims First, The National Compassion Fund, Classroom of Compassion, Bloomberg’s “Everytown For Gun Safety”, Shannon Watts, Moms Demand Action, Students Demand Action, March For Our Lives and Sandy Hook Promise.

9. ‘Strong’ Cities hashtags created to declare allegiance to the Strong Cities Network and to circulate propaganda.

10. ‘Strong’ Cities merchandise immediately created and sold as if prepared ahead of time.

11. UN language used incessantly.

12. ZERO hard evidence.

13. ‘Praying through Tragedy’ and other Language of a Psyop.”

In addition, emergency medical protocols are often not followed at these events and victims are declared dead without being taken to the hospital. That usually only happens when a person has been dead for many hours or days.

— Comments —

Robert Robbins writes:

I don’t know if the latest shooting in Georgia this week actually happened, but I do see a comment here either way after watching a brief interview with a boy who supposedly lived to tell about whatever happened. As you have documented before in similar interviews post-horrific episodes, the boy is literally smiling the entire length of the interview, with flippant arm gestures (throwing arms up in the arm), which is precisely what you don’t do after an encounter as traumatic as that. Your whole body is weighed down by the stress of it and you are emotionally and physically exhausted. This young lad is smiling and seemingly ready to hit the pizza shop for a bite to eat.

“I was just like kinda scarred.”

If it did actually happen, I am perhaps more horrified that young people are so divorced from reality that their emotions cannot work for them to understand the trauma and tragedy. It is one thing for someone to be ignorant, since that is our natural beginning state, as we are born with a tabula rasa, but it is another thing for people to be apathetic to this degree or, worse still, to manifest the contrary and normal and healthy emotional state like fear, sadness, or just tiredness. Someone who laughs or smiles or is overall light hearted talking about a tragedy like shooting children is either a demoniac or a psychopath or both.

Mr. Robbins adds:

To the point, informative, and intriguing, your post was very good to help shine light on the mass shooting phenomenon. I had no idea hoaxes were a lawful thing now.

The world is so crazy, one is hard pressed not to become insane a little just trying to follow it. Perhaps therein lies the secret–don’t follow the world.

Laura writes:

Great point: Follow the world and and fall into lies.

So sad that people desire manufactured distractions. That’s the heart of it all.

Alan writes:

Whether “mass shootings” are real events or hoaxes is a valid question but a secondary point.  As you note, there are good reasons to conclude that some or many such incidents are staged.  But either way, they are a most convenient pretext for another propaganda barrage and for Do-Gooder entities to crawl out of the woodwork.

“Gun control” and “mental health” are codewords for surrendering more and more power to government and to “public-private partnerships”, which is code for Communist Government.  Either way, limitless government will come out on top, while individual rights, personal responsibility, the right to bear arms, and the administration of law by means of objective standards and rules are to be extinguished sooner or later, as Tyrannical Government may decide.  We can be certain that it is all carefully planned, scripted, and rehearsed.

Laura writes:

A moratorium on all publicity surrounding these events would help solve the problem, but that’s not even remotely possible.

Kathy G. writes:

The idea that it is a legitimate/legal government function to lie to and terrorize it’s own citizens with propaganda and shooting/pandemic hoaxes is simply monstrous, and should completely erase any lingering notion that we live in any kind of a “representative” system. This is all very old strategy, the ancient “Problem-Reaction-Solution”, the first historical reference of it that I know of being Diocletian burning down his own palace in order to blame and punish the early Christians. Nearly daily now, I learn of some historical event I was taught that was in reality something else entirely, or some new “crisis”, incident, or impending doom-prophecy. The Great Deceiver has been very active in the past several hundred years, and secrets are being revealed. Being grounded in Christ, Scripture, and Faith is such a help. I can’t imagine not having that, and trying to make sense of all of this and understand reality.

Janice writes:

Another aspect of these events comes to mind: the possibility of the pre-planning of the abduction of children from these places so they can be trafficked – afterward falsely reported as being killed? Maybe my imagination is in overdrive, but that could be one more motivation behind these stagings. Faking crimes is diabolical to begin with, so its not as if those responsible for it are incapable of it! Unless logistics would somehow prevent it, these ” crime scenes” would lend perfect cover for such activities.

Laura writes:

I hadn’t thought of that. Anything’s possible, but I think the success of these things depends on parents not losing their children. It’s unlikely any parent would remain quiet if a child’s body disappeared.

Please follow and like us: