A Royal Celebrity Is Born
May 6, 2019
THE NEW YORK Times plays up the racial angle to the max with the reported birth of a son to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle:
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex — better known as Prince Harry and Meghan Markle — on Monday welcomed their first child, a boy, the first multiracial baby in the British monarchy’s recent history.
Reporters Ellen Barry and Palko Karasz hyperventilate over the implications for multicultural Britain:
For many, the new baby’s importance will be indelibly linked with race.
Britain is 87 percent white, but multiracial children make up its fastest-growing ethnic category, and will soon be the country’s largest minority group. The entry of Meghan Markle, the descendant of plantation slaves, into the royal family resonated deeply with many people of African descent, who almost immediately began to anticipate the birth of the couple’s first child.
The future is bright for America too. There is positive jubilation that the child is not white:
“It’s hopeful for people of my kids’ generation to see a princess of mixed race,” said Lise Ragbir, who is black and has written of her own experience raising a lighter-skinned child.
Repeatedly, beginning when her daughter was 6 months old, she said, strangers have approached her to ask, “Is that your baby?”
“It will be such a recognizable baby that it could shift people’s awareness,” said Ms. Ragbir, 45, a gallery director in Austin, Tex. “When one of the most famous families in the world does not have the same skin tone, people might pause before asking a stranger, ‘Is that your baby?’”
And then there’s this queer statement from the alleged father, Prince Harry:
“This little thing is absolutely to die for, so I’m just over the moon,” a beaming Prince Harry told reporters outside the couple’s residence near Windsor Castle. “Mother and baby are doing incredibly well. It’s been the most amazing experience I can ever possibly imagine. How any woman does what they do is beyond comprehension, and we’re both absolutely thrilled.”
“This little thing.” There is something …. detached about these words.
When she was eight months pregnant, Meghan and Harry went to pay their respects to the victims of the New Zealand mosque false flag (remember: a false flag may involve real victims). Notice how easily she bent down and got up, how she does not walk or move like a heavily pregnant woman, lending support to the very dark theory that this older, re-tread bride was not really pregnant. We are not ready to embrace this theory. But in the through-the-looking-glass, Masonic monarchy of subverted Britain, anything is possible.
Whether he is the child of a surrogate or the real deal, we know one thing: “this little thing” will be used to promote a sinister agenda.
— Comments —
Susan-Anne White writes from Northern Ireland:
The entire saga of this pregnancy and birth is curiouser and curiouser.
Yesterday shortly before 2 p.m., Buckingham Palace announced that the Duchess of Sussex had gone into labour then confirmed the baby’s arrival 40 minutes later. Yet Meghan Markle’s Instagram stated she had given birth in the early hours of the morning of 6.5.19.
What could account for this discrepancy? The fact that she also chose to have an unnamed female doctor to lead the team caring for her and dispensed with the usual male doctors who attend royal births is also mystifying to me. She described such male doctors as “the men in suits.” Then there is the matter of where the baby was born, i.e was it a home birth or a hospital birth?
Why the secrecy if everything is above board? During her pregnancy Meghan Markle’s appearance and behaviour invited comment because the size of her developing baby didn’t always appear to match her due date plus she always seemed far too nimble for a pregnant woman.
If all is as reported i.e that Duchess Meghan has given birth to a baby boy then the public has not been deceived, but I cannot shake off the feeling that all is not as it appears.
Laura writes:
Meghan also did not appear for a traditional postpartum photo shoot.