AFTER reading this opinion piece about the truckers protesting in Ottawa by David Moscrop of The Washington Post, it occurred to me just how deep anti-trucker sentiment is among the “educated” and enlightened. Moscrop does not hold back, calling the dissident drivers “toxic,” “far-right,” “authoritarianist” and “insidious extremists.” You can find similar vitriol in other news pieces and in statements from politicians over the past few days.

This disdain perhaps does not apply only to the truckers protesting forced medical injections — the real issue at hand that Moscrop doesn’t even acknowledge, thus suggesting the truckers are engaging in indiscriminate, “anti-government” trouble-making — but to truckers as a class.

Truckers are part of the invisible class of men that keep the economy going by doing often unpleasant jobs. What could be worse?

** Truckers are overwhelmingly white men, i.e. they are “white supremacists”

** Truckers don’t go to college

** Truckers don’t go to diversity and inclusion seminars

** Truckers control our food supply

** Truckers drive big, big vehicles and are responsible for destroying the planet

** Truckers don’t read The Washington Post or listen to NPR

Whatever happens in the next few days in Ottawa, and however encouraging all the support from ordinary Canadians who have cheered the truckers on is, I predict truckers in general are not going to come out looking good, at least not in the news. I also believe those in power genuinely fear the trucker. He is organized with his brothers; he could refuse to participate in, or expose, deliberate sabotage of our supply lines; he is not easily seduced by propaganda and he could weaponize his vehicle. Expect truckers to be increasingly portrayed as villains in order to rally the people against them and ultimately to automate their jobs out of existence.

— Comments —

Zeno writes:

Besides the general animus against truckers (and against working-class people in general, which is not new — but then, isn’t the Washington Post owned by a famous billionaire?), what strikes me is the expression used in the title, which I read as “toxic freedom”. Yes, I suppose the writer is applying it only to the “Freedom Convoy”, but it does seem to be a rant against “freedom” in general.

The same people who supposedly pushed “freedom” until recently — “freedom” to have sex with anyone, “freedom” to divorce, “freedom” to abort babies, now appear to be increasingly against freedom in any way or form — even the most basic freedoms of movement, of choosing which medicine to take, and even of protesting against unfair rules.

They really, really want us to be slaves, with no choice other than whatever the elites decide is “good”, and they will stop at nothing to do it — they will even turn us into cyborg automatons if they can. Scary stuff.

Laura writes:

Moscrop is guilty of projection.

He’s the insidious extremist and authoritarianist.

CANADIANS in Salmon Arm, British Columbia lined the streets today as the “Freedom Convoy” of truckers resisting vaccine mandates passed by. Below is a scene from yesterday in Abbotsford.

This controversy is a major test of the trucking industries in both the U.S. and Canada. Their independence could ensure our future food supply.

Florence Nightingale

FROM Notes on Nursing by Florence Nightingale (Harrison, bookseller to the Queen, 1859; p. 23)

“We must not forget what, in ordinary language, is called “Infection;”*** – a thing of which people are generally so afraid that they frequently follow the very practice in regard to it which they ought to avoid. Nothing used to be considered so infectious or contagious as small-pox; and people not very long ago used to cover up patients with heavy bed clothes, while they kept up large fires and shut the windows. Small-pox, of course, under this regime, is very “infectious.” Read More »

A FLORIDA speech therapist says she has seen dramatic spikes in developmental delays in young children, especially in language abilities. She blames the use of face masks.

“We are seeing a lot of things that look like autism. They’re not making any word attempts. And not communicating at all with their family,” explained [Jaclyn] Theek. 

“It’s very important that kids do see your face to learn, so they’re watching your mouth,” added the pathologist. 

A LIGHTING store a few miles away from us is permanently closing next month.

It has been in business for 72 years. It’s an independent, small business, not part of a chain, and sells all kinds of lamps, light fixtures and the accessories that go with them, including shades, harps, bulbs, sockets and that little thing at the top of a lamp that keeps it all together. Everything electricity has engendered in the way of illuminating human existence, it has sold.

During the last couple of months, I visited the store a few times. I was one of the vultures picking over its stock, all of which has been deeply discounted.

On one visit, I picked out a reading floor lamp as a Christmas gift. It was 50 percent off.

I asked the salesman — a stocky, black man with neatly-tied dreadlocks and bulging eyes — for the lamp with the dark finish. I recognized him from previous visits. After he had carried the box out from the stockroom, I asked — though I felt bad — if I could have the one with the silver finish instead.

“Yes, ma’am,” he said.

“I guess you’re used to people changing their mind,” I said, smiling apologetically.

“Yes, ma’am,” he said, without skipping a beat.

And when he turned to go back to the storeroom with uncomplaining fortitude, I saw — as if in a vision — the throngs of  nerve-wracking, indecisive, neurotic, uninformed and sometimes grateful and pleasant customers he had served over his many years in this brilliant showroom of lights. He had mastered the ability to overcome irritation with courtesy. He was a retail warrior who had learned a thing or two about human nature.

Read More »

MARK A.I. writes:

With regard to your thought-provoking observation about Covid’s apparent respect for billionaire longevity, from a Forbes article on billionaire deaths in 2020, we have this: “In a year that will likely be remembered around the world for the devastation and loss of life caused by the coronavirus pandemic, 17 billionaires passed away in 2o20–but, as best as we can tell, none did so after contracting Covid-19. That compares to 23 billionaires who died in 2019.”

Then in 2021, Forbes tells us 27 billionaires shuffled off their mortal coils. Again, apparently not a single one from Covid. Read More »

THE wealth of the world’s billionaires increased more during the fake pandemic than in the previous 14 years combined, according to a report from Oxfam. While income fell for 99 percent of the world’s population, the ten richest men doubled their fortunes.

This is all pure coincidence, of course.

“Billionaires have had a terrific pandemic. Central banks pumped trillions of dollars into financial markets to save the economy, yet much of that has ended up lining the pockets of billionaires riding a stock market boom,” Oxfam International Executive Director Gabriela Bucher said in a statement Monday accompanying the latest report.

Bucher added that if the 10 richest men in the world were to lose 99% of their wealth, they would still be richer than 99% of all the people on this planet.

Interestingly, none of these billionaires died of “Covid.” This is a medical miracle. Deadly germs don’t like the rich, but more study must be done to understand this phenomenon.

Read more at ABC News.

DISTURBING similarities between the landowning peasants in the Soviet Union and today’s “unvaccinated” are described here.

Junius Brutus Stearns/Dayton Art Institute

ON THE morning of December 13, 1799, when it was snowing heavily and about 30 degrees Fahrenheit, George Washington toured his estate at Mount Vernon, Virginia on horseback. He was sixty-seven years old and in good health at that time, well enough to perform this daily ride and to supervise five farms. He had recently retired from politics, complaining that politicians had regard for “neither truth nor decency.”

The day before, he had also gone out in the wet snow. He returned home in damp clothes and, not wanting to detain guests, sat down to dinner without changing.

At dinner on the 13th, he was reportedly in good spirits but stated that his throat was sore. His secretary was concerned and suggested he take some medicine. Washington, as recounted in George Washington: A Life by Willard Sterne Randall (Henry Holt & Co, 1997), responded

“No, you know I never take anything for a cold. Let it go as it came.”

Unfortunately, Washington and his doctors, as the night and next day progressed, did not follow this non-invasive approach. If they had, the president may have lived into the 19th century. Instead, concerned about the extreme inflammation of the president’s throat, they resorted to the medical wisdom of the time. Before long, close to half the blood in Washington’s body had been drained by leeches and he was administered mercury, known now to be highly toxic, as well as other substances.

Three doctors were by his bedside, the youngest of whom, Elisha Cullen Dick, advised at one point an immediate tracheotomy to allow Washington, already considerably weakened by bloodletting, to breathe. The other doctors rejected this proposal and Dick pleaded with them to stop bleeding the president:

“He needs all his strength — bleeding will diminish it.” Read More »

The Cold, Norman Rockwell

PEOPLE say there is no cure for the common cold.

But, I believe the cure was found ages ago, in distant history, and people just don’t want to accept it. They want drugs. They want something “scientific.” They want a quick fix that doesn’t disrupt their lives. And that’s why they have not found the best response to sore throats, coughs and stuffed noses.

The cure is rest. A pillow, a bed or soft couch, a glass of water nearby, maybe something light and entertaining to read or watch — that’s all that is needed.

A friend told me that she turned on the TV the other day and an “expert” was telling people to go to the hospital if they get “Covid” — a term of quackery for all kinds of respiratory conditions, including the common cold. What nonsense. Covid is pure invention, the re-branding of colds, flus, pneumonias and other illnesses for the purposes of social engineering on a global scale. Imagine all those who have needlessly and perhaps disastrously run to the hospital. (NOTE: Obviously some have needed acute care. I am not saying here that no one has gotten seriously ill or died.)

Getting back to the cure: resting at the very first sign of a cold, avoiding all stress and work for at least 24 hours when symptoms are still mild, will invariably, I have found, shorten the length and severity of a cold, except in those who are suffering from especially poor health, which is often the case today. Serious rest at any stage is good, but if delayed it will have less immediate benefits. The demands of life unfortunately make it impossible for some people to take this cure and they may end up with illness that lasts for weeks.

I am no expert so you can disregard what I say. At least I’m not selling you anything. I’m not seeking to control you. I don’t get a sick thrill out of decimating your creative energies for the sake of power. Years of observation and trial-and-error have simply taught me this cure, which has ZERO harmful side effects. Did you read that? No harmful side effects. Read the warning labels on your Tylenol and Sudafed or some of the outrageous treatments being proffered today for colds, even in the alternative media, and consider the difference. The cold, being very common and profitable, has spawned an empire of sales gimmicks, all of them costly failures.

Again, rest is the cure. Not rest for an hour. But sustained rest and avoidance of all mental and physical activity that is in any way taxing or stimulating. (Working in bed or watching a thriller while in bed do NOT count as rest. Trying to solve personal problems on the phone while in bed does NOT count as rest.) What a mind-blowing, radical idea. Hell will freeze over before the World Health Organization, which couldn’t care less about your health, tells you the importance of rest. That’s a lesson that has no benefits for its sponsors — for governments or “philanthropists” or major pharmaceutical companies.

The psychology of a cold is an interesting, related subject. A cold can be made worse by a dread of slowing down and doing nothing, but also by the neurotic belief that a cold is a bad thing, that it is an interference or an unnatural occurrence. Dread and anxiety can be self-fulfilling.

Colds, though unpleasant, are necessary to the sustenance of existence. They detoxify the body, the respiratory organs being used for excretion. It makes sense that rest would aid this work. So intelligently are our bodies designed that they possess different processes of elimination. The sneeze, the cough, the runny nose — they are synergistic reactions to our environment and the substances we absorb, some of which we must expel in order to survive. Our bodies are eliminating what they don’t need and what could be harmful. Sadly many people resent their own bodies and are disastrously alienated from them, believing they are machines that should “function” at all times. So they are ticked off when they get colds. In the history of the human race, people have probably never embraced this mechanistic and ungrateful view of the body as completely or enthusiastically as they do now.

Colds are cyclical, happening more often in the darkness of winter, which makes sense because then the crops are harvested and human beings can afford to expend some effort to throw off a build-up of wastes. Like trees shedding their leaves at the same time, people living under the same conditions get colds at the same time. They are eating and breathing in the same things. They are experiencing the same light and the same air, the same fabrics and the same detergents, the same chemtrails and electromagnetic waves. If they all got sick at different times, these recuperative processes of elimination would be much more disruptive of society.

We don’t live in spite of colds. We live because of colds. A cold is the road to health. If we accept its demands with rest and light, proper nutrition (another subject), we will find ourselves only stronger after it is gone. Read More »

TOO sad for words.

My sympathy goes out to this family, which has been so deeply betrayed. Read More »

FROM an article by Dawn Lester, co-author with Dave Parker of the excellent book, What Really Makes You Ill: Why Everything You Thought You Knew about Disease Is Wrong:

It is a fundamental principle that the burden of proof lies with those who propose a theory. Yet in the case of the ‘germ theory’ that ‘proof’ does not exist; there is no original scientific evidence that definitively proves that any ‘germ’ causes any specific infectious disease. Although this statement will be regarded as highly controversial and even outrageous, its veracity can be demonstrated.

There are a number of sources that provide a corroboration of the assertion that the ‘germ theory’ lacks any original scientific proof. One of these sources is Dr. M.L. Leverson MD, who, in May 1911, gave a lecture in London in which he discussed his investigations that had led him to the conclusion that,

“The entire fabric of the germ theory of disease rests upon assumptions which not only have not been proved, but which are incapable of proof, and many of them can be proved to be the reverse of truth. The basic one of these unproven assumptions, wholly due to Pasteur, is the hypothesis that all the so-called infectious and contagious disorders are caused by germs.”

Dr. M Beddow Bayly also exposed the lack of any scientific basis for the ‘germ theory’; in his 1928 article published in the journal London Medical World, he states that,

“I am prepared to maintain with scientifically established facts, that in no single instance has it been conclusively proved that any microorganism is the specific cause of a disease.”

It is clear that evidence to support the ‘germ theory’ remained conspicuous by its absence many decades after it had been proposed by Louis Pasteur. However, the situation has not been rectified; the germ theory of disease remains unproven with overwhelming evidence to demonstrate that it also remains a fallacy.

Despite the authoritative nature of the assertions of the medical establishment that ‘germs’ cause disease, there are no explanations for the mechanisms by which microorganisms produce the wide variety of symptoms in varying degrees of intensity that are claimed to occur when a person becomes ‘infected’. This represents an immense knowledge gap, although not the only one we discovered.

It is claimed that ‘germs’ multiply within the cells of the host and that this can precipitate an excess level of ‘cell death’ that is said to be an indicator of disease. It is commonly assumed that it is the ‘germ’ that caused the cell to die; but this is a mistaken assumption.

Read more.

EVEN amid the beauty of Christmas, the doom-and-gloomers were busy spreading their cult of fear and dread.

They cannot stop thinking of death. They cannot let a day pass untouched by medical anxiety. We are experiencing an ongoing mass psychological breakdown disguised by the technical wizardry of pseudo-scientific tests.

Let me ask: If “variants” are everywhere and constantly emerging, how did human beings survive for these thousands of years? And without forced medication or years of social isolation?

Hundreds of thousands of viruses exist and they are constantly changing to meet the environmental assaults we encounter. They even change to meet the individual body. As the writer Jeff Green points out, viruses are enzymes that cleanse our bodies of the often cyclical build-up of toxins. They are not our enemies. Unlike bacteria, which are living organisms, viruses are not alive. They are not devouring predators. They are our friends — and one variant cannot dominate a whole society for weeks and months because viruses are too specific to their immediate environment.

Our bodies are intelligently designed to withstand many assaults. Our greatest enemies are ourselves and foolish ignorance. If people are unusually sick (and people are always sick), something else is going on. Some toxin has been introduced.

So much joy and peace have been lost. Anxiety is self-perpetuating. Once a person is habituated to it, he just won’t let go. The human race will never be wiped out by a virus. But it may be wiped out by fear.

IT IS not possible to say that there has been a specific disease called Covid-19 (or any variant of that disease) because there is no — and never has been — an accurate test for such a disease. The clinical symptoms mimic other flus, pneumonias and respiratory conditions. Environmental factors such as the cyclical build-up of airborne pollutants, pre-existing health problems and unusual medical treatments, especially the use of mechanical ventilators and extreme social isolation and panic, have not been scientifically ruled out as causes of  deaths and respiratory conditions in certain geographic areas.

I say all this not based on personal feeling or speculation, but on basic study. I am not a scientist but I am able to read the work of scientific journalists and it is my obligation to do this basic study (not that it matters to anyone). I do not need to be an expert to conclude that the science behind Covid-19 is very poor.

PCR tests are scientifically meaningless. The Nobel Prize-winning scientist who invented the test said they should never be used for the purpose for which they are currently being used.

This is not to say people are not sick nor is it to deny anyone who is sick great sympathy and the best of care. But you should not say, “I had Covid-19” or “I think I have Covid-19.” There is no scientific basis for you or any doctor making such a statement. Read More »

VIDEO link.

IT IS a sign of just how material-minded our society is that it is in the grip of a relentless, paranoid fear of physical death and phantom contagion while sustaining indifference to spiritual death. The first death happens once. The second, forever.

Some relevant thoughts on Delay of Conversion: Read More »

These short excerpts are from Dr. William Trebing’s 2006 book Goodbye Germ Theory. Read More »