Our Feminized Navy Allows Women on Subs
April 29, 2010
THE NAVY announced today, after the expiration of a period for Congressional intervention, that it will allow women aboard submarines as of 2012. How long will it be before the first child is conceived on a military underwater vessel or before a female commander turns the forced togetherness of submarine life into a maritime version of Mommie Dearest?
According to the Seattle Times:
Rear Adm. Barry Bruner, who led the Navy’s task force on integrating women onto submarines, brushed aside questions from reporters about the potential for sexual misconduct or unexpected pregnancies among a coed crew.
“We’re going to look back on this four or five years from now, shrug our shoulders and say, ‘What was everybody worrying about?'” said Bruner, the top sub commander at Kings Bay Naval Submarine Base in coastal Georgia, where the announcement was made.
Does he mean the same way people are shrugging their shoulders now about women abandoning duty because of pregnancies, about thousands of charges of sexual harrassment by women soldiers against other soldiers, about the effect of women on troop cohesion, and about the military mothers who have had to leave their children behind?
The wives of sailors on subs have expressed their displeasure over this tight coed living. Why shouldn’t they? Our armed forces are part defense and part love-making. But Navy Secretary Ray Mabus said in a public statement, “We literally could not run the Navy without women today.” For thousands of years, countries defended themselves with men. Imagine. Everything has changed. Men literally could not do it.