Why are these shoes piled up at the site of the alleged Dayton massacre?

THE Masonic operatives who plan false flag shootings typically leave empty shoes as a clue. From Nice to Orlando to San Bernardino to Las Vegas, images of empty shoes appeared prominently in the news coverage immediately following massacres in these cities.

Here is a pile of shoes in the nightclub district in Dayton, the site of Saturday’s alleged shooting. But, victims do not fly out of their shoes when they are shot! Most people do not fly out of their shoes when they run away!

Ole Dammegard examined the shoe symbolism in an interview mentioned in this previous post.

NOVUS ORDO WATCH comments:

First convened by the “Theology of the Body” mastermind “Pope Saint” John Paul II in 1985, the Novus Ordo phenomenon of World Youth Day has long been dubbed the “Catholic Woodstock” on account of the rampant occasions of carnal sin it offers due to the free mixing of large groups of young men and women, most of whom are dressed in shockingly immodest ways.

It may just be, however, that there is an even more sinister side to World Youth Day.

The most recent such event took place in Panama in January of this year. Frequent visitors to this site may recall the horrendous prayer and adoration vigil “Pope” Francis presided over, which featured a grotesque-looking hollow metal monstrance in the form of the Blessed Mother:

Monster-ance! Horrid Adoration Ceremony at World Youth Day Vigil Service

So far, so bad.

But now some people on Twitter have claimed that during that ceremony Francis used a humeral veil with a trim pattern that displays a logo used by pedophiles and pederasts to identify themselves to kindred spirits. Thus we decided to investigate, and what we found was shocking. [cont.]

JESSE LEE PETERSON, beginning at minute 54 in this interview, briefly discusses the effects of college education on black women, who dramatically outnumber black men in “higher education.” The official story is, of course, that this is all a great advance for women. Peterson maintains it is making it impossible for black men to marry them.

MIKE ADAMS has five questions that he says prove that the El Paso Walmart shooting was a staged event. (That doesn’t necessarily mean no one was killed.)

Youtube has taken down videos questioning this event and the Dayton shooting, ridiculously defining them as “hate speech.” (I guess, Sherlock Holmes was a hater too.) The era of readily available amateur reporting is suspended for now. But censorship is in itself evidence of staging. Censorship also will not contain the growth in understanding of state-sponsored terrorism and its deliberate psychological effects.

Note to readers: I’m sorry I have not been able to respond to emails over the past week. I hope to return to regular blogging this week.

— Comments —

Lydia Sherman writes:

This young Mexican-American says there was a training drill at the same (El Paso) location earlier.

A comment there from New Zealand:

“I absolutely agree. In the new Zealand shooting they were doing active shooter training also. Trying to scare everyone. After the new Zealand shooting strict gun laws were immediately passed”

Another comment: Read More »

“O LORD MY GOD, make me submissive without protest, poor without discouragement, chaste without regret, patient without complaint, humble without posturing, cheerful without frivolity, mature without gloom, and quick-witted without flippancy.”

— St. Thomas Aquinas

(AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File)

PROTESTANT columnist Chuck Baldwin writes:

[J]erry Falwell Jr., Pat Robertson, Franklin Graham, Robert Jeffress, et al. have been gushing over Trump like he’s another John the Baptist who’s paving the way for the Messiah. These “Christian leaders” have the ear of millions of evangelicals. If these “great men of God” say it, it must be true.

But, again, that’s the superficial reason why evangelicals love Donald Trump. The real reason lies much deeper. Are you ready for this? The real reason evangelicals love Donald Trump is because they are just like him.

Thankfully, there are wonderful exceptions to what I am saying. Over my 44 years of Gospel ministry, I have come to know some of the sweetest, kindest, most loving, humble, godly, giving, honest and honorable Christian evangelists, pastors and people in the world: wonderful, precious souls. But without reservation or hesitation I can say that these terrific people are a small percentage of the whole. In word and deed, most evangelicals have a track record of being little more than miniature reflections of Donald Trump. Evangelicals love Donald Trump because in character and conduct he is truly one of them.

Liberal blogger Kevin Drum nailed it:

If you want to think of evangelicals as hypocrites, that’s fine. But don’t think of them that way because of Donald Trump. He is practically the apotheosis of conservative Christianity in America, not some weird, blustering outlier. No one should be either surprised or shocked that they love him.

However, there are four specific things about Donald Trump that make him achieve this almost god-like status with evangelicals.

No, it’s not his pro-life verbiage. Like Trump, most evangelicals only provide lip service to the pro-life cause. Evangelicals will look you in the eye and tell you that the GOP is a pro-life party. Read More »

BROTHER NATHANAEL reports on mandatory universal enlightenment.

Watch it now ’cause it’s gonna disappear!

Jan Sluijters, Landscape with Full Moon, 1910

FOR MUCH of history, human beings gazed at the moon and saw the grandeur of God. Who but an Artist infinitely superior to any Michelangelo or Titian, could have created such an ornament for the sky, a jewel of changing complexity that sheds its cool-blue light on all?

Now human beings look at the moon and see the sublimity of Man.

A writer for The New York Times feels religious awe (you know, the sort of awe he would never feel for religion) on the anniversary of Apollo 11:

But as a commemoration of the moon landing, that kind of emphasis on our own era’s greater enlightenment falls flat — because what Apollo represents is not goodness but greatness, not moral progress but magnificence, a sublime example of human daring that our civilization hasn’t matched since.

More and more people believe the moon landing was a staged production. I don’t really know, but I wouldn’t put it past the stage managers. Leaving that issue aside, I would like to suggest that Apollo 11 really wasn’t that big of a deal. It has not done anything positive for human nature.

When it comes to the moon, I’ll take poets over astronauts. They understand that the wonder inspired by the moon is very different from technological progress. As Robert Frost said in his “Freedom of the Moon:”

I’ve tried the new moon tilted in the air
Above a hazy tree-and-farmhouse cluster
As you might try a jewel in your hair.
I’ve tried it fine with little breadth of luster,
Alone, or in one ornament combining
With one first-water start almost shining.

I put it shining anywhere I please.
By walking slowly on some evening later,
I’ve pulled it from a crate of crooked trees,
And brought it over glossy water, greater,
And dropped it in, and seen the image wallow,
The color run, all sorts of wonder follow.

Yes, all sorts of wonder come from the moon.

I’m not putting down scientific investigation, only suggesting it has serious limits (especially when it is faked). Science describes matter, it doesn’t explain. It can’t explain why the mysterious glow of the moon often seems the shadow of an outstretched, loving hand. Moonlight, shining through the window like a spotlight meant for you, suggests the supernatural. And we don’t need astronauts to appreciate its mysterious depths and comprehend it.

JOHN PURDY writes:

That is a fine article you posted [about women’s suffrage.] I can’t help chuckling, thinking about how Nancy Pelosi would respond. The elephant in the room that set the stage for Women’s Suffrage was the extension of the franchise to all male citizens. One can’t help wondering how things might have turned out if it had remained restricted to male property owners. Read More »

FROM John Schindler at The Observer:

What then can we conclude at this point? It appears that Jeffrey Epstein was involved in intelligence work, of some kind, for someone—and it probably wasn’t American intelligence either. The U.S. Intelligence Community is lenient about the private habits of high-value agents or informants, but they won’t countenance running sex trafficking rings for minors on American soil, for years. While it’s plausible that Epstein was sharing some information with the FBI—many criminals do so to buy themselves some insurance—it’s implausible that he was mainly working for the Americans. Read More »

OLIVER HEYDORN continues to explain the social credit monetary system (social credit, despite the name, is not socialism):

[W]e need not live under a 100% debt-money system; that all money must be issued as a debt or as a debt-equivalent is a human convention and can be changed. There is an alternative. Some portion of the money supply, the right proportion, could and should be created and issued as ‘debt-free’ credit.

It was C.H. Douglas who proposed that the ‘more money’ that the economy needs in the form of consumer purchasing power in order to balance the price system should be injected periodically as a ‘debt-free’ input. Instead of governments, consumers, and businesses spending more than they receive as a means of bridging the gap and borrowing the difference from the banking system (thus unbalancing their budgets), the increase in the volume of consumer buying power that the economy requires for equilibrium could be created by a National Credit Authority and issued to or on behalf of consumers as a kind of ‘gift’. The direct payment would come in the form of a National Dividend and would be distributed independently of employment status. This would allow people to enjoy more and more leisure time; a reality that the physical economy can no doubt afford as we no longer require the work of every able-bodied adult to make the economic machine function adequately enough so as to vanquish scarcity. The indirect payment would come in the form of a compensated price discount at the retail counter.

The benefits of such an adjustment to our financial infrastructure are countless. Business and government could – apart from any expansion required by independent consumer demand – finally run balanced budgets, and consumers, considered as an aggregate, would never be put into the position of having to spend more money than they had received.

IT’S not easy analyzing the mind-bending statements of the pretend-pope Francis. His points veer so sharply here and there, with the help of peculiarly weird slogans, which are the inevitable fruits of theological absurdity. Thus we get statements like:

But it’s necessary to give an objective sexual education, without ideological colonization. If you begin to give a sexual education full of ideological colonization, you destroy the person.

In a new post, Novus Ordo Watch does an excellent job with these and other remarks Francis made on what’s known as “sex education.” He warmly approved of it, of course, but only after hitting the right bells.

“THE GREATEST menace of Bolshevism is its creation of a herd-like mentality in the people, which thinks in terms of the lowest intellectual levels, which destroys all initiative in the individual and kills all differentiation of taste and personality. There are no Russian people left but Russian masses only, and in thirty years’ time the same statement will apply to all the other enslaved States behind the Iron Curtain. There will be just masses all the way from Vladivostok to Stettin. The colour of their skin may be usually white, sometimes yellow, but their distinguishing characteristic will be the negative one of belonging to the [new] masses. This will be a mass-produced, homogeneous and characterless human pulp that has been churned out on the assembly lines of the camps and in the retorts of Communist education propaganda. This is the youth produced by Communism and trained to have no individual thoughts or ideas of their own. They have ready-made slogans only, coined by propaganda. This is a herd of anthropomorphous beings, shepherded by Jewish commissars armed with tommy-guns. One sees no longer the glittering billions of single water-drops but only muddy and turbid floodwaters.

“So-called civilised man of the Western world is still unaware of the meaning and importance of these anthropomorphous masses which have lost all knowledge of the outside world, of the beauties of life and of the value of personality. The Iron Curtain hermetically sealed them off from living thoughts and ideals. They possess less knowledge of the outside world than had the people of the Middle Ages. They know nothing about history, culture or present-day life in the West. They live in a distorted dream world produced and projected for them by Ilya Ehrenburg and David Zaszlavszky.

“But unfortunately the proud citizens of the West are little better off in this respect. Their knowledge, general outlook and political ideas are similarly mass-produced, controlled and directed by their Jewish entertainment monopolies. The personality of Western man has atrophied and his national heroes have been forgotten. Their place was taken by that most ridiculous figure of Western democracy, the “man in the street“, i.e. by the average half-educated, ignorant human being who is unable to think for himself. Today this person states his opinion in the Press, answers the questions of the Gallup (187) poll and represents public opinion and “world conscience” in the name of which the scandal of Nuremberg was staged and the massacre of Katyn was hushed up. What does this “sharp-witted” individual, this constant reader of picture-comics and detective stories, know about the “Elder Statesmen” performing behind the screen of the political parties, about the plans of the “initiates”, about decisions of the lodges and about the lies of the Press? He simply reiterates everything hammered into his head by journalists and newspaper kings of Galician Jewish origin. And the columnists of democratic and republican organs alike will, of course, only spread such “opinions” as favour the world conquerors.”

— Louis Marschalko, The World Conquerors, 1958

ANTHONY ESOLEN has written a thoughtful article at Chronicles magazine on the 100th anniversary of women’s suffrage:

One hundred years have now passed since both houses of Congress passed the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution granting women the right to vote.

For a long time, both major parties were ready to grant the suffrage, should American women clearly ask it of them.  The question was never whether women were worthy of it.  It was rather what, if anything, the change would mean for men, women, family life, and the common good.

Men and women of letters, male and female reformers and religious leaders, ranged on both sides of the issue. The liberal Theodore Roosevelt, for example, was for suffrage, while Mariana Griswold Van Rensselaer, first woman architectural critic, was solidly against. A public debate over the matter took place in the pages of the August 1894 issue of The Century Magazine. Arguing against women’s suffrage was Rev. James Monroe Buckley, Methodist minister and editor of the influential weekly newspaper Christian Advocate. For suffrage was Senator George Frisbie Hoar (R-Mass.).

It’s worth looking closer at what these 19th century prophets predicted would result from suffrage, so that we can know them by their fruits, and use their insights to judge the modern results of suffrage. Voting is a mechanism, a tool, and so should be judged by the work it does: the nation and culture it produces. Only a fool continues to use a crooked T square. If the house falls, of what avail was your philosophical commitment?

Read more. Read More »

YOU’VE heard of children being forcibly removed from their parents’ care. The reverse can now happen to the old.

An elderly woman in Alabama has been removed from the care of her daughter, detained in a hospice and placed on anti-psychotic medicine. Her daughter is only permitted to see her twice a month and cannot take her home. See the report at Lifesite News.

Real Pen Work, Prof. J.R. McFarren

HERE’S another American song for Independence Day. This is cowboy Harry Stephens singing “The Night Herding Song” in Dallas in 1942.

Unfortunately, I think this song qualifies as hateful too. Stephens calls cows “doggies,” and, even though that was a common term, it seems to be a slur of some kind. I hope you will once again overlook the prejudices of the past.

Read More »

NAT KING COLE sings another traditional American tune. A commenter at Youtube writes:

Growing up, my parents often had to pay more attention to my autistic brother than to me, so I spent much of my time with my grandfather. This was his favorite song, and when I was sad he would always sing it to me to make me feel better. I watched him die a few years ago, the most horrific experience of my life. I like to go shopping at antique malls and a month ago on the anniversary of his death, I went to one to cheer myself up. I think he was there with me that day because shortly after I walked in, I found a little music box that plays this tune. I immediately bought it and it’s now my most prized possession. Read More »