KYLE writes:

The current attack on retro Christmas-time entertainment brings to mind all of the pop vocalists of the past who had five decade careers in radio, television and film yet today, we only hear them at Christmas time. The lasting legacy of some of America’s most iconic popular vocalists will likely be their Christmas recordings. Crooners like Crosby, Dean Martin, Perry Como, and Andy Williams hosted dozens of Christmas specials.

From the perspective of someone born in the 1980s, the America of these Christmas shows seems so remote. Read More »

‘THANK YOU’ very much to the readers who sent donations in response to my latest fundraising campaign. I am grateful for your generosity. However, it is not over yet! I am looking for 100 readers to donate $25 today. Please consider a contribution. Donate via Paypal below, or write to me at thinkinghousewife@msn.com and I will send you a mailing address. Your support is greatly appreciated.

If you read this blog regularly, or occasionally, and if it is worth the price of two movie tickets, a trip to a museum, the price of a decent paperback, or a week of take-out coffee, I hope you will donate.

A reader sent a donation this weekend and wrote:

I have read your blog for many years. I admire you for your truth and for your courage. I wish I had 10 percent of each.

Another reader wrote:

Your website means so much to me; it’s a haven of sanity, and wholesomeness,  in a world that is getting exponentially crazier and sicker by the day.

Thank you so much for all you do!

And thank you for your encouragement and generosity.

            

EVIDENCE of rampant sexual abuse in pubic schools (or synagogues) never gains much traction in the media. Only stories, many of them never substantiated, of abuse in the Catholic Church count.

See more at TheMedia Report.com.

James Gillray, 1799

ADVENT is traditionally a time of fasting and penance.

It’s also a good time to consider the subject of gluttony.

The sin of gluttony does not just involve eating too much food. It can also entail thinking too much about food or being too fastidious. You can usually find thin people who are gluttons in natural foods markets. Drinking to the point of inebriation is also a form of gluttony.

A worthwhile sermon on the subject can be found here.

WOULD you like a Christmas TV special wholesome enough for the whole family?

This 1953 episode of the detective series Dragnet may fit the bill. I recommend it for families with children over the age of eight. (There’s nothing salacious in it for younger children, but the topic of crime is not appropriate for them.)

In this episode, detectives Joe Friday and Frank Smith investigate an important case on Christmas Eve in Los Angeles. The statue of the Baby Jesus has been stolen from the manger of a local church. They want to recover it by Christmas Day. The famously stone-faced Friday and Smith take the case so seriously that they devote the entire day to the investigation despite other pressing cases. I won’t spoil it for you by revealing the results of their investigation, but I will tell you that the crime is happily solved.

Note:

* The politically incorrect banter about differences between the sexes

* Acting that is so bad it is good

* The Brooklyn accent of the Hispanic priest

* The respectfulness of the two hard-boiled detectives

* The joke about how priests and detectives would be out of business if there were no thieves

* The bums at The Golden Dream Hotel who know the true meaning of Christmas

Do you wonder why more shows like this are not made today?

Catholics were a major, organized force for decency in movies and TV when this show was made. Every year, starting in the 1930s, Catholics around the country took the Legion of Decency Pledge at Sunday Mass during the week in December of the Feast of the Immaculate Conception. Here it is:

I condemn all indecent and immoral motion pictures, and those which glorify crime or criminals. I promise to do all that I can to strengthen public opinion against the production of indecent and immoral films, and to unite with all who protest against them. I acknowledge my obligation to form a right conscience about pictures that are dangerous to my moral life. I pledge myself to remain away from them. I promise, further, to stay away altogether from places of amusement which show them as a matter of policy.

That battle largely ended with the rise of the Counterfeit Church of Vatican II.

Immaculate Conception, Filippo Parodi, 1660s

SHE IS one of only two women in history conceived without sin. The other is Eve.

She is the Immaculata, patroness of the United States, the Mother of humankind, the Queen of Heaven.

She reigns with humility, tenderness and compassion. God willed from the beginning of time and the moment of her conception that she would crush the head of the serpent, the cause of Eve’s downfall and the source of all evil. We honor and praise her Immaculate Conception today. May she help us through her intercessions to love our enemies, deliver us from our faults and embolden us in battle:

Thou art the ark of salvation; the one creature unwrecked in the universal deluge; the white fleece filled with the dew of heaven, whilst the earth around is parched; the flame which the many waters could not quench; the lily blooming amidst thorns; the garden shut against the infernal serpent; the fountain sealed, whose limpid water was never ruffled; the house of the Lord, whereon His eyes were ever fixed, and into which nothing defiled could ever enter; the mystic city, of which such glorious things are said. We delight in telling all thy glorious titles, O Mary! for thou art our Mother, and we love thee, and the Mother’s glory is the glory of her children. Cease not to bless and protect all those that honour thy immense privilege, O thou who wert conceived on this day! May this feast fit us for that mystery, for which thy Conception, thy Birth, and thy Annunciation, are all preparations—the Birth of thy Jesus in Bethlehem: yea, dear Mother, we desire thy Jesus, give Him to us and satisfy the longings of our love.

— Dom Gueranger, O.S.B.

PLEASE donate to this blog.

Thank you!

            

SHOES are everywhere — not just because of common rudeness.

This photo (above) of a Paris street near the Bataclan massacre is one of probably thousands of similar shoe pictures, allegedly photos of the shoes of the victims or those fleeing the event, that have appeared in the media after reported vehicle and gun massacres. Typically the shoes are Nikes. However, these shoes from the Las Vegas attack do not appear to be Nikes:

Here in the San Bernardino attack, one of the atttackers allegedly — and absurdly — fell out of his (or was it her?) shoes:

Oddly enough, human beings who are shot with modern weapons or struck by vehicles do not normally fly out of their shoes. People who are running away from danger do not typically sail out of their shoes though it does sometimes happen. (Check with police officers or rescue workers to verify this.) Why then are we so often shown pictures of empty shoes at the scenes of alleged terror attacks?

These shoes are part of a code. The planners of these events are communicating with each other. If you would like to understand exactly why these shoes are there, and why photos of abandoned shoes (and sometimes still occupied shoes such as here and here) appear prominently in the media after these events, I highly recommend this interview with Ole Dammegard. (I’m sorry about the macabre photos but the truth is, they are probably every single one fake.) I post this interview not to frighten you. It should have the exact opposite effect, and that is my intention. It should liberate you from emotional manipulation and fear. But if you are highly sensitive, please do not listen to it. I also understand that it is painful to learn that you have been deceived. It can be extremely painful. This is a point that Dammegard, much to his credit, makes very well. But in the long run, the alternative — ignorance — is more painful.

This post, by the way, is not a blanket endorsement of the work of Dammegard, and it is not a blanket endorsement of Crowdsourcethetruth, which interviews him. (In general, I advise extreme wariness with regard to all conspiracy websites, but in particular any websites that have a slick look or seem well-funded and claim to understand all conspiracies. So often they are controlled opposition.) It is an endorsement of the content of this important interview. And it is a very important interview. It will knock your socks off, if not your shoes.

Free yourself with information. Arm yourself with knowledge. Don’t give your soul to fear mongers. You can spot the next staged event.

WHEN out in the world, occasions may arise when we are tempted to give in to impatience with the almost incredible rise in bad manners. We should hold our temper, and remember that boors are made, not just born. Our ancestors would be astounded at the level of common incivility today, but bear in mind that many people have never been taught otherwise.

My husband has a way of keeping his cool. When he comes across people on trains and in cafes who put their feet up on the furniture — this is common practice today, he wants to go up to them and say, “Get your feet down now!” But he doesn’t. It’s just not a good idea. Instead he discreetly takes a snapshot of the offender.

He has acquired extensive documentary proof that many people today think the world is their bedroom. You might say, they “have no boundaries.” Here is a picture he took yesterday on a commuter train. This spoiled brat should have been tossed out the door and onto the platform, but most likely he will be leaving his footprints on walls throughout the region.

These photos will never solve anything.

But they are evidence, taken at the scene of the crime. And somehow that makes things better.

Laura Wood

A NOTE TO READERS:

Almost every week, I receive requests from advertisers to place paid posts on this website. I never accept these offers. The income would not be very large, but more importantly, I’d like to preserve this small, out-of-the way space as an ad-free zone. Advertising makes it hard to think. And that is the purpose of this blog, to inspire you to persevere in the hard work of reflection, especially about the ideas and news stories you come across elsewhere. If I have helped you question an idea you took for granted, and headed you in the right direction, that is success.

Talented writers make a living doing what they do at major publications. But there are things they don’t dare question. This blog has been in existence for almost ten years. That is a remarkable fact given that it receives no significant financial backing. I am entirely independent from all who are pushing an agenda, and so are the others who write posts for this site. Many writers on the Internet use pseudonyms, often very weird ones. I write under my own name, and I take full responsibility, as hard as that may be, for what I say. People have gone to jail for some of the truths and opinions expressed here. I hope you will consider that. It has kept me awake once or twice!

When you visit a museum, you may spend $25 to roam through its galleries for a couple of hours. Think of the time you have spent reading this blog. Is it worth the cost of a museum visit or a few museum visits?

In this Advent season, a time of alms-giving, please consider making a donation, small or large, to this website to keep it “on the air” and compensate me for the considerable sacrifices and costs. There is so much more I would like to post here.

To donate by Paypal, please use the link below. Or write to me at thinkinghousewife@msn.com for a mailing address. You can be assured that your information will be kept confidential.

Thank you, and may God reward you for your kindness and generosity!

Laura Wood

RedSilverj tells it like it is.

FROM The Wall Street Journal:

Abortion is legal in most of Europe, but its proponents are bent on suppressing efforts to change the minds of mothers considering it.

Witness France’s ban on a television commercial showing happy children with Down Syndrome (DS). Produced to commemorate World Down Syndrome Day, the commercial showed several cheerful children with DS addressing a mother considering abortion. “Dear future mom,” says one, “don’t be afraid.” “Your child will be able to do many things,” says another. “He’ll be able to hug you.” “He’ll be able to run toward you.” “He’ll be able to speak and tell you he loves you.”

Read more here.

So many women, with legal abortion used as eugenics, have lost the opportunity of a lifetime.

The Annunciation, Sandro Botticelli; 1489

THE fish is made for the sea and the hawk is made for the open sky. But the human soul is made for eternity. We were made to swim in changelessness, to soar above the little things.

And yet here we are. In the wilderness of time. Can we put our feet nowhere and stay? We look inside and see chasms of bewildering nothingness.

When a small child goes to a rocky beach, he has an instinctive urge to pick up a pebble and throw it in the water. He likes to toss things around. But he is fascinated by the ‘plunk’ of the little stone in the water. It is the sound of depths. We throw ourselves into life. As we do, we hear mysterious depths. They are within ourselves. An ocean within. Or an infinite sky. We only feel truly ourselves when we are soaring in it.

If this vastness is truly nothing, or an impersonal infinitude, then all is meaningless. If it is something, then everything is possible.

The founder of only one religion said that everything is possible — on the condition that we love Him. 

How odd. Moses didn’t command people to love him. Muhammad didn’t say his followers must love him. Neither did Confucius or Martin Luther. But Jesus said we must love Him.  Only an egomaniac — or God — would demand that sort of devotion.

Infinitude and finitude — can we fathom these contradictions within ourselves? We resolve them by loving the Man who was God. In adoration, the conflict vanishes.

In the beginning was the Word: and the Word was with God: and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him: and without him was made nothing that was made. In him was life: and the life was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness: and the darkness did not comprehend it. John 1:1-5

Advent, the season in which we light candles in the wilderness of this frantic, restless world, more frantic and restless than ever, begins today.

These candles seem so modest, but they are the expression of exalted aspirations. They are pebbles tossed into a bottomless sea. We light our own hardened hearts. We make room for the divine babe. We prepare them anew for that wonderful truth.

In one moment of history, all human longing was answered. And the depths, they were beautiful.

SALWA BACHAR at Tradition in Action looks at the cult of ugliness in fashion:

[I]t seems that society has completely lost its sense of beauty. Even with immodest fashions, there were always some elements of aesthetics, charm and refinement. Now, all beauty is thrown out the window and the goal becomes to look as ugly and devilish as possible.

Bucks Country farmhouse, Thomas W. Nason; 1937

I ONCE MET a middle-aged married couple who lived in a beautiful house. It was a handsome stone house built in the late nineteenth century with a lush, well-maintained garden and very tasteful furnishings. The kitchen was a replica of a colonial kitchen except it had the most powerful and expensive appliances. The kitchen floor was covered with a rustic, brick-colored tile. The antique maple farm table in the dining room could seat at least ten people comfortably and exuded warmth. It was hard not to struggle with feelings of envy when visiting this house.

One day, the husband turned to the wife — they had no children, but one much-loved dog — and said to her, in all seriousness and with a grave expression of contempt on his face,

“You don’t interest me anymore.”

The wife was a frightfully intelligent and accomplished woman. Very interesting in many ways, but yet she didn’t always think on her feet. She should have responded with something like,

“What’s your point? You stopped interesting me the day after we were married.”

Instead she just said, “Really?” Or something similar.

He had found somebody else who was interesting.

With those few words — cold, callous, cruel words — the legal machinery of divorce was set in motion, like a truck with bad brakes barreling down a hill. In less than a year, the beautiful house was emptied and sold. She moved to the country. He moved in with his girlfriend.

The moral to the story is obvious: A house is not always a home. Even the most beautiful house, one that outwardly speaks of entrenched and unassailable traditions, one in which the birds sing with contentment in the garden, as if there were no better place to live on earth, is not always a home. One can live in a castle and not have a home. One can live in a hovel and have a home.

You can live in modest shabbiness and find your spouse, if not always entertaining, always interesting. In fact, poverty itself is very interesting. Something is always going catastrophically wrong when you are poor. Little things become big things. Perhaps that’s why it’s harder for a rich man to get to heaven than it is for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle. He’s led to believe things will always unfold beautifully.

Build your house, but don’t forget to keep your home. Read More »

ALAN writes:

It is doubtful that Leftist Revolutionaries have employed any tactic more lethal in their war against traditional America than their prolonged attack on American families.  The worst thing about that is not that they are so zealous in working toward that goal; that is to be expected.  It is rather that generations of Americans have made it so easy for them.

I never had the benefit of a large family. Someone will protest immediately that large families are not a benefit but a burden. I concede that both are possible, but I suspect that most people who come from large families would say they are a benefit far more often than a burden.

The neighborhood where I grew up and attended grade school was populated mostly by German, Polish, and Slavic families, many of whom had lived there for 70 or 80 years.  One of my classmates who lived in the same block where I did remembers families with ten or more children.

A newspaperman wrote in 1967:

 “One feature of the neighborhood is its many large families—households of 10 or 15 children are not uncommon.”

    [Richard Krantz, “The ‘Scrubby Dutch’ of South St. Louis”, St. Louis Globe-Democrat, Feb. 8, 1967 ]

On my daily walk to school in the 1950s, I often walked past a house owned by a Polish family who had 10 children.  The children slept on cots placed throughout the house. Meals were served in three shifts.  Not only did they get by; they took pride in caring for their property and the alley out back.  That was part of the moral fabric of people who lived in that neighborhood.

Three blocks away, there was another family with 15 children.  “We assigned each of the children chores,” their mother told Mr. Krantz, “and when they left for school in the mornings, all the beds were made and shoes were never left lying on the floor.”   Read More »

TO the right and left bushes of some sort, golden and crimson, glowed with the colour, even it seemed burnt with the heat, of fire. On the further bank the willows wept in perpetual lamentation, their hair about their shoulders. The river reflected whatever it chose of sky and bridge and burning tree, and when the undergraduate had oared his boat through the reflections they closed again, completely, as if he had never been. There one might have sat the clock round lost in thought. Thought—to call it by a prouder name than it deserved—had let its line down into the stream. It swayed, minute after minute, hither and thither among the reflections and the weeds, letting the water lift it and sink it until—you know the little tug—the sudden conglomeration of an idea at the end of one’s line: and then the cautious hauling of it in, and the careful laying of it out? Alas, laid on the grass how small, how insignificant this thought of mine looked; the sort of fish that a good fisherman puts back into the water so that it may grow fatter and be one day worth cooking and eating. I will not trouble you with that thought now, though if you look carefully you may find it for yourselves in the course of what I am going to say.

But however small it was, it had, nevertheless, the mysterious property of its kind—put back into the mind, it became at once very exciting, and important; and as it darted and sank, and flashed hither and thither, set up such a wash and tumult of ideas that it was impossible to sit still.

— Virginia Woolf, A Room of One’s Own

It is not enough to have love for our neighbor—-we should notice of what sort it is, and whether it is true. If we love our neighbor because he does us good, that is, because he loves us, and brings us some advantage, honor, or pleasure, that is what we call a love of complacency, and is common to us with the animals. If we love him for any good that we see in him, that is, on account of beauty, style, amiability or attractiveness, this is love of friendship, which we share with the heathens. Therefore, neither of these is a true love, and they are of no merit, because purely natural and of short duration, being founded upon motives which often cease to exist. In fact, if we love anyone because he is virtuous, or handsome, or our friend, what will become of this love if he should cease to be virtuous, or handsome, or to love us, or, still worse, if he should become our enemy? When the foundation upon which our love rested, sinks, how can it support itself! The true love which alone is meritorious and lasting is that which arises from the charity which leads us to love our neighbor in God and for God; that is, because it pleases God, or because he is dear to God, or because God dwells in him, or that it may be so. There is, however, no harm in loving him also for any honorable reason, provided that we love him more for God’s sake than for any other cause. Yet the less mixture our love has of other motives, the purer and more perfect it will be. Nor does this hinder us from loving some, such as our parents and benefactors, or the virtuous, more than others, when such preference does not arise from the greater good they do to us, but from the greater resemblance they have to God, or because God wills it. Oh how rare is the love of this sort, which deserves to be called true love! Nolite amare secundum camem, sed secundum spiritum sanctum—-Love not according to the flesh, but according to the Holy Spirit.

— St. Francis de Sales

[Thank you to Brenda] Read More »