FROM NPR:

Hungary’s parliament passed a series of laws on Wednesday criminalizing the act of aiding undocumented immigrants seeking asylum in the country, despite strong objections from leading European rights bodies. [Notice that this bill does not punish immigrants themselves; it punishes those who encourage migrants to leave their home countries.]

The suite of bills, called “Stop Soros,” allow the government to imprison individuals and nongovernmental organizations for up to a year if they’re deemed to be facilitating what it says is illegal immigration by people not entitled to protections, the BBC reported. A separate amendment to the constitution declared that an “alien population” can not be settled in Hungary.

The latter is in direct defiance of the EU’s migrant relocation plan that would spread more than 150,000 Syrian, Iraqi and Eritrean asylum seekers among member countries — a quota policy Hungary has been fighting since it was first rolled out. Read More »

DRONES, not passenger airplanes, hit the World Trade Center on 9/11, argues James Perloff:

9/11 wasn’t just the crime of the century, it was arguably the crime of the millennium. An extraordinary crime required extraordinary planning and spending. No conventional civilian Boeings would have been used for it. And I think, for many of us in the Truth Movement (myself included), we have tried to analyze the “plane strikes” based on the characteristics of ordinary planes. Since no ordinary planes could achieve the results of 9/11, some of us made the “either or” mistake, and discarded planes in favor of “no planes at all,” “holograms,” or “CGI added after the fact.”

I do believe that jetliners, modified in the types of ways this post has suggested, could resolve the observed phenomena, including the “impossible” penetration of the second tower (even the “nose out”), the entry gashes in both Towers, the holes in the Pentagon rings and Shanksville soil, and the presence of aircraft wreckage (but in scant amounts untraced to the original aircraft).

A drone, unlike the original jetliner, would also allow for the pod visible on the undersurface of “Flight 175.”

Their sermons are boring and trite, not concerned about objective Catholic dogma and morality, but about purely naturalistic ideas of being good to your neighbor, being concerned about the environment, and being generally “nice.”

[…]

Modernism is the most lethal enemy of the virtue of faith, and we have seen the result of this poisoning of souls in the public immorality and worse, in the legalization of immorality, indeed in the murder of babies and unnatural vice, both abominations in God’s eyes in countries which were once staunchly Catholic.

The Novus Ordo clergy, as a whole, and with only a few exceptions, are guilty of this moral apostasy and have on their hands the blood of the innocent babies who will be aborted in these once Catholic countries.

In related news, Frank the Fake has received yet another hideous and inhuman crucifix for his collection:

Novus Ordo Watch writes:

Francis can add this abominable piece of junk to his ever-growing collection of blasphemous and twisted “art”, which already includes a Communist hammer-and-sickle crucifix, an occultist crucifix, a monster-ance, and many other ugly things. Read More »

OLD WOMEN, locked in a state of perpetual immaturity, try to look sexy and cool. The New York Times applauds.

They look ridiculous. It’s an Emperor-Has-No-Clothes world.

The old lady had too much dignity, too much wisdom. She often aged gracefully. She had to go.

Elizabeth Lewis, John Singleton Copley; 1771

IF MOST Americans understood the basics of our monetary system, they would rise up as one — left and right, black and white, Christian and non-Christian — to overturn it and take the power of money creation out of private hands. Most don’t understand it because important details are never mentioned in the media or in schools. Bill Still’s 1996 documentary The Money Masters: How International Bankers Gained Control of America is an outstanding introduction. It can be viewed in its entirety here. A transcript is available here. From the opening:

Since the turn of the century, there has occurred throughout the world a major increase in debt and a major decline in the freedom of individuals, and of states, to conduct their own affairs. To restore a condition of widespread, modest wealth is therefore essential to regaining and preserving our freedom.

What’s going on in America today? Why are we over our heads in debt? Why can’t the politicians bring debt under control? Why are so many people – often both parents now – working at low-paying, dead-end jobs and still making do with less?  What’s the future of the American economy and way of life?

Why does the government tell us inflation is low, when the buying power of our paychecks is declining at an alarming rate? Only a generation ago, bread was a quarter and you could get a new car for $1,995!

The answers to these question can be found in an examination of our financial system, in which banks create credit based on their own interests rather than upon real credit, which is the value of goods, services and our collective cultural inheritance.

ROBYN writes:

Your reader Paris asks for your help in her struggle to convince her husband to have more children. I agree that they should stop using contraception as this is a mortal sin that is highly offensive to God. Abstinence may be necessary when it is for reasonable causes such as while a woman is recovering from a previous pregnancy, if she is not healthy enough to have another child, or like you said, if there were dire financial or other family circumstances to deal with first. However, we shouldn’t avoid our procreative role in order to shelter ourselves from the struggles that come along with a new baby or how older children might react. We need to have trust in God’s providence, and we must do our part to bring new life into the world.

I am currently reading a book that I think would help Paris and her husband. It’s titled “Searching for and Maintaining Peace: A Small Treatise for Peace of Heart” by Father Jacques Phillippe. Read More »

SEBASTIEN writes from France:

Hervé Ryssen, well known in France for his books on the psychology of Judaism, was recently summoned to appear in court for publishing a book on large scale international frauds that are based in Israel.

In his six major books on the psychology of Judaism, Ryssen presents facts and documentation that leads to the incontrovertible conclusion that Jews are deeply traumatized by their psychology. His book Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism can be read here.

Someone has kindly taken the time to subtitle an interview of Ryssen outside the 17th chamber in Paris, the courtroom where all thought crimes cases are heard. Even if you don’t understand his French, you can clearly see how rapidly he thinks, how well he expresses himself and how courageous he is. Read More »

“Attribute to God every good that you have received. If you take credit for something that does not belong to you, you will be guilty of theft.”

— St. Anthony of Padua

David Hockney

ALAN writes:

Wherever a man is engaged in contemplation, it is common for people to say about him that he is “lost in thought.”

I suggest that this is nonsense. They have it backward: Such men are not “lost” in thought. They are at home in thought. They do not “lose” themselves in thought. They create themselves in thought.

If they are “lost,” it is in the “real world” as they attempt to navigate through a maze of liars, fools, frauds, airheads and swindlers.

How is one’s mind assaulted in public places today so that it is nearly impossible to be lost in thought?  Let me count the ways:

Traffic: The endless din of trucks, buses, and monster vehicles.

The beeping of vehicles used for landscaping.

The indescribable, mind-destroying noise of motorcycles and vehicles deliberately engineered to be as loud as modern technology makes possible.

The noise mendaciously called “music” from passing vehicles. Read More »

I WENT into Target the other day to look for a new thermal lunch-bag for my husband when I noticed a big rack with Father’s Day cards. I stopped to look at them — most of them were $6! — and noticed one that was for “two Dads,” obviously a card for a “gay” couple. Would anyone buy this card? I wondered. Very possibly.

It is heart-breaking to think about it. It’s heart-breaking for any child to be forced to live a lie. One father is all we get. Some may seem like fathers to us. But we only have one. Nothing else is possible.

That’s the beauty of fatherhood. Nothing — not death, not divorce, not abandonment, not a cultural revolution against fatherhood — can change this fact. And nothing can entirely sever the tie between a father and his child. That tie is biological and spiritual. People who haven’t seen or spoken to their fathers for years still think of them and are affected by them. Fatherhood used to be cultural too but that is very much breaking down. An enormous, heavily-funded state apparatus is directed to keeping fathers out of their homes. But no tyranny can ultimately succeed at this project however many families it cruelly and coldly destroys. Fathers will always live in their children’s hearts and cannot ever be entirely exiled from them. Even a bad father lives on.

In Charles Dickens’ David Copperfield, the protagonist is a young boy born without a father. The trajectory of his life is established from the beginning by his fatherlessness.

I was born at Blunderstone, in Suffolk, or ‘there by’, as they say in Scotland. I was a posthumous child. My father’s eyes had closed upon the light of this world six months, when mine opened on it. There is something strange to me, even now, in the reflection that he never saw me; and something stranger yet in the shadowy remembrance that I have of my first childish associations with his white grave–stone in the churchyard, and of the indefinable compassion I used to feel for it lying out alone there in the dark night, when our little parlour was warm and bright with fire and candle, and the doors of our house were—almost cruelly, it seemed to me sometimes—bolted and locked against it.

The book goes on to give what seem to be living examples of every kind of father: the cruel stepfather, the indebted and reckless father, the overly protective father, the devoted father. And it ends in great happiness. David Copperfield becomes a father himself. Could Dickens have imagined a world with “two Dads?” He might not have been able to imagine it, but he could understand it. The human scene, he knew, was varied and constantly produces new eccentricities.

What about those children with “two Dads?”

Stay tuned. They will someday tell the world they only have one. Greeting cards and big, corporate retailers cannot change nature.

Happy Father’s Day to all fathers, both good and bad, both appreciated and under-appreciated. Never doubt that you are loved and have a permanent place in the hearts of your children. Read More »

PARIS writes:

I would like your opinion on my situation. I’m 35 years old, and have three kids. I’ve always felt like I was meant to have two more. I always feel, whether it be in taking pictures or sitting on our living room couch, that there is this empty spot left for this child or children that I was supposed to have.

My youngest is now 10. And I feel like I’ve been in mourning for at least five years over not having more kids. I still have “baby fever” so to speak. My husband didn’t want more kids after last one because we didn’t have much money then and he was attending school. We were also on food stamps. Now ten years later, our income has more than doubled (financially we’re probably middle class), and we are not on any government assistance, yet husband still doesn’t want any more kids. I feel so horrible. Read More »

HEART OF JESUS, glowing furnace of charity, king and center of all hearts, have mercy on us. 

June is the month of the Sacred Heart. Pray the Litany of the Sacred Heart (below). Read More »

An ad for Frances Valentine, Kate Spade’s last fashion business

STEPHEN IPPOLITO writes from Australia:

You really nailed it in your post about Kate Spade with your observation on that “black hole above the…fireplace” suggesting a world view that life is “dark and purposeless.” Spot on! There’s even a second such image in that sequence of shots – it’s in the second photo, in a frame above Mrs. Spade’s right shoulder, as she is shown gazing at herself in a mirror – a duplication that hints that something in Mrs. Spade perhaps may have been drawn to bleak images.

I felt very uneasy as I studied these shots and couldn’t understand why. It seemed to me that I had felt the very same unsettling sensations somewhere before. I found that quite surprising because I share your view about the stylishness and good taste of the branded products bearing her name. Then I recalled where I’ve felt the same uneasy sensations: every time I watch the famous opening title sequence of Hitchcock’s atmospheric film, Vertigo.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q42Jdx6T7nI

The sequence was obviously very deliberately composed around the image of a black hole to reflect the film’s bleak central themes of obsession, alienation and above all: the morbid appeal that death holds for many people who are drawn to the darker side of life. The sequence features segmented shots of the face of a woman who is never shown whole and does not appear in the world of the film at all. It dwells particularly on the image of the pupil of one of her eyes – oversized, perfectly round, black and empty. It strikes me, as I think it must strike most people, as a portal into a terrible void. Such a strange and unsettling image to find as a decoration on the walls of a family home.

Fans of Vertigo will already know that the appeal of suicide looms front and centre among the film’s themes: the central female character Madeleine, like Ms Spade a stylish and elegant woman, is obsessed by the spirit of a long-dead woman who committed suicide, attempts suicide, herself, in San Francisco Bay and describes life as a walk down a long corridor “and at the end of the corridor is nothing but darkness.” She confides in the Jimmy Stewart character early on that: “I don’t want to die, but there’s someone within me and she says I must.” Read More »

IT IS ALWAYS extremely sad when someone commits suicide. So it is with the death this week of the wildly successful New York fashion designer, Kate Spade, 55, whose upbeat, chic, and colorful feminine accessories were understandably very popular.

Spade, who hung herself with a scarf and leaves behind a husband and a 13-year-old daughter, obviously had a dark side she did not wish to reveal to the public. This darkness is apparent to me in the artwork which decorated the multi-million dollar homes in New York and the Hamptons owned by her and her husband, Andy Spade. These homes combine a studied, preppy look of classic furniture, elegant patterned fabrics and cozy knick knacks with chillingly bleak modern art. This contrast is a common form of juxtaposition among the fashionable. On one hand, there is a devotion to tradition and on the other there are “I-reject-all-that” gestures. The art people hang in their homes expresses their worldview and definitely affects their inner states. Even people with vast resources to buy the most expensive of things often cannot make a full commitment to beauty because they are alienated from its source. This alienation, I submit, was the cause of Spade’s death. How could Kate possibly make sense of intense inner suffering in such a world?

I offer these images, however, mostly without comment and with condolences to her family. I do not mean to suggest that all modern art is dangerous. Much of it, however, makes people unhappy because it is ugly and bleak or simply confirms an emptiness within. Much of it is mere sensation and thus enforces a profound meaninglessness.

Read More »

AMERICANS support the Israeli military to the tune of $10 million a day, money that could potentially go to providing health care, college tuition, housing and jobs to the poor in this country and elsewhere.

The Israeli army has killed and injured thousands of unarmed Arabs, including medics and journalists, in recent weeks. (A total of 112 have been killed and more than 13,000 have been injured, some shot in the head and limbs.) But the army also routinely performs “extra-judicial” assassinations of Palestinians who are considered a threat.

Yesterday, Ezzeddin Abdul-Hafith Tamimi, 21, was shot by soldiers elsewhere from the protests by Gazans. Here is his story, posted at the If Americans Knew blog. Please bear in mind when reading this that Tamimi was 21 years old, that he was not attacking anyone when he was shot down and that he never got his day in court. Please bear in mind also that you and I are indirectly complicit in these actions because of American support:

Ezzeddin Abdul-Hafith Tamimi, 21, was shot by Israeli soldiers in Nabi Saleh village with three live rounds from very close range in an extrajudicial assassination. The soldiers then prevented Palestinian medics from approaching Ezzeddin as he lay, critically injured, on the ground.

According to eyewitnesses, Palestinian medics tried to provide aid to the seriously wounded man, but the soldiers assaulted them, and threatened to shoot them. Ezzeddin then succumbed to his injuries.

When Ezzeddin’s mother was informed that he was killed, she rushed to see him, but the soldiers sprayed her face with pepper-spray and forced her away. Read More »

Conchita Wurst, the transgender winner of the Eurovision Song Contest

The anniversary of the Devil’s Day suicide mission – and the Marxist E.U. which it spawned, are nothing for Americans or Europeans to celebrate.

After 73 years of moral and cultural rot, unlimited Third World immigration, [also non-stop wars of foreign aggression that are not in the interest of Americans or Europeans, have decimated other peoples and have helped create waves of refugees] and now, a steadily eroding economy, the ever diminishing number of British & American D-Day survivors have got to be asking themselves, “What was it all for?”

To quote the British Historian David Irving:

“If the British soldiers on the beaches of Normandy in 1944 could look forward to the end of the century and see what England has become, they would not have bothered to advance another 40 yards up the beach.”

— The Anti-New York Times

AS MORE women see through the lies of feminism and embrace the traditional life, the Big Media are likely to shame and demonize the housewife more and more. Annie Kelly, a Ph.D. student who is writing her dissertation on internet anti-feminism, sets a very, very high standard in this regard with her recent article at The New York Times. No longer is the housewife just a loser and a parasite, she is now a “sinister,” “authoritarian,” “hyper-feminine,” “racist,” “abhorrent,” ‘red-lipsticked,” “lunatic” “white supremacist” so afraid of being violated and objectified by men that she opts for submission. She’s also the usual parasite (Ph.D. students writing political tracts are not parasites): Read More »