TWO MORE CONTRIBUTIONS for St. Valentine's Day: A list of Shakespearean terms of endearment in case you want to impress someone and a piano version of the American love song, "When I Fall in Love," performed here by Beegie Adair: When I fall in love It will be forever Or I'll never fall in love In a restless world like this is Love is ended before it's begun And too many moonlight kisses Seem to cool in the warmth of the sun When I give my heart It will be completely Or I'll never give my heart And the moment I can feel that you feel that way too Is when I fall in love with you And the moment I can feel that you feel that way too Is when I'll fall in love with you

HAPPY ST. Valentine’s Day!

Here is a pretty love song by King Henry VIII. Yes, the Henry VIII. It’s a reminder that romantic love can be so beautiful and intense. It’s also a reminder that romantic love is not always true. Two of Henry’s wives lost their heads despite all his romantic feelings. Ouch! Sometimes “love” hurts!

Saint Valentine, for whom this day is named, was also beheaded about 270 A.D. — for supernatural love, not romantic feelings. The Romans were very ticked off at him:

Calphurnius immediately cast him into a dungeon, and gave orders to Judge Asterius to accuse him as an enemy of the gods, according to law. Asterius wished first to make an attempt to win over the Priest, who was so universally loved, from the Christian faith, but to the good fortune of the judge, the contrary took place. Valentine restored the sight of the daughter of Asterius, who had been blind for many years, and, in consequence, the judge and his whole family forsook their idolatry and were baptized. When this was reported to the Emperor, he admired the power of the God whom Valentine adored, and endeavored to set the Saint free, but again frightened by Calphurnius with an insurrection, he at length gave orders to behead him. Saint Valentine received his death sentence with great joy, and ended his life by a glorious martyrdom.

More history about this little-known saint and the pagan origins of a day devoted to love can be found here:

Of St. Valentine few particulars are known. He was a holy priest of Rome, put to death about the year 270. One of the great Roman gates was built in his honor and called after him. It is now known as “del Popolo.”

But the name of St. Valentine has come down to us associated with the remnant of a pagan custom, that of choosing for a year some person to whom honor should be paid. The casting of lots was held on the 15th of February, and with it began the Roman festival of Lupercalia, in honor of the god Pan and the goddess Juno. To put down so dangerous a feast-making, the Church, according to Alban Butler, instituted the custom of drawing saints to be venerated for a year on the feast of St. Valentine, the day preceding that of the pagan lot-drawing, thus substituting heavenly for earthly love.

O holy Martyr, St. Valentine, pray for us.

Here is King Henry’s song:

“Whereto should I express”
By King Henry VIII

Whereto should I express
My inward heaviness?
No mirth can make me fain
Till that we meet again.

Do ‘way, dear heart, not so!
Let no thought you dismay ;
Though ye now part me fro,
We shall meet when we may. (more…)

AIPAC, the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee, has the power to make or break the careers of American politicians. Everyone in politics knows that. AIPAC’s friends bribe politicians. (It’s not “lobbying,” it’s bribery. It’s not a conspiracy, it’s in the open.) So why the storm over comments by Democrat Ilhan Omar? The pit bulls will not tolerate this knowledge becoming more widely known among the general public. If harmless small fry like Omar are allowed to state damaging facts many people already know, then the real truth-tellers might stand a chance.

AIPAC, and the other three dozen or so Israeli lobbying groups in Washington, should be registered as the agents of a foreign country, and politicians who work for Israel should move there. (The Israel lobby, which many Jews do not entirely support, also includes Christian Zionist groups.)

In related news, learn how hired Israeli manipulators (“hasbara”) influence debate on the Internet here.

What is an “anti-Semite?”

An “anti-Semite” is someone who has the nerve to cry out as he’s being attacked by Jewish control freaks. His cries of pain are “anti-Semitic tropes.”

Sometimes it seems that the problem with “anti-Semites” is not what they say, but that they dare to exist. That’s the problem with the Palestinians. They dare to exist.

Remember, your tax dollars fund genocidal violence:

See full-length movie here.

By the way, the just solution is not, as Noam Chomsky argues, a two-state solution, but one state.
(more…)

Impurity imprisons a man in material things. Normally, his taste for study fades and his intelligence diminishes because his strength to concentrate on more elevated matters perishes. He loses the pleasure for abstract thought, which forms the basis for the life of the mind. The imagination runs out of control, fantasy begins to dominate his mind. The will becomes soft; the certainty of reason disappears, and it becomes insecure. The man’s spiritual nature wanes as matter increasingly communicates to the soul its animal influence. Then, the spirit deteriorates and fades.  One proof of this is that all the peoples who deliver themselves to immorality decay from the intellectual point of view.  --- Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira

IF A perfume company released a report lamenting the fact that few men use perfume, and stated that "traditional masculinity" is to blame, would you be surprised? How about if the company said perfume will make men happier and the world a better place? Wouldn't the possibility of self-interest on the part of the company occur to you? Why then when the leading organization that markets and regulates talk-based psychotherapy announced that "traditional masculinity," with its stoicism and emotional reserve, is bad and that men need to be more emotional and willing to submit to psychotherapy, were so many conservative commentators alarmed and seemingly stunned? A storm of protest continues over the American Psychological Association's recent guidelines on psychological treatment for men and boys. “Traits of so-called ‘traditional masculinity,’ like suppressing emotions & masking distress, often start early in life & have been linked to less willingness by boys & men to seek help, more risk-taking & aggression — possibly harming themselves & those with whom they interact,” the APA stated as part of its highly successful promotional campaign. Men don't seek or like psychotherapy as much as women. That's been true since Sigmund Freud. Can you imagine any of the men Americans have, for better or worse, most admired in therapy? Can you imagine George Washington on the couch? Yes, masculinity itself is to blame. Therefore, if you want more people to go into therapy, you would want there to be less masculinity in…

MARIAN T. Horvat, Ph.D. argues that expressions of love have been trivialized:

The list of what the modern man purports to love is endless: “I love that restaurant, I love to barbecue, I love my dog, my cat, my hamster, my Subaru…”

The word loses its meaning and becomes as banal as the objects one claims to love. “To love” is trivialized, flattened and loses its original noble meaning. (more…)

  Come, Holy Ghost Come, Holy Ghost, Creator blest, And in our hearts take up Thy rest; Come with thy grace and heav'nly aid to fill the hearts which thou hast made, To fill the hearts which Thou has made. O Comforter, to thee we cry, Thou heav'nly gift from God most high; Thou fount of life, and fire of love, And sweet anointing from above, And sweet anointing from above.  

CARYL writes:

Your recent post on Lawrence Auster and Fatherhood was great. I am sure that he knew —and that you know of Daniel Amneus and his books – Back to Patriarchy, The Garbage Generation, which is found at this site.

Amneus’s books are about the importance of fatherhood.  In Back to Patriarchy,   he described the American male  as “surely the most exploited, even if not the most degraded and impoverished human who ever lived.” (more…)

IN THE forthcoming book Our Borders, Our Selves: America in the Age of Multiculturalism, to be published soon by VDare Books, the late Lawrence Auster argues that the cultural revolution of the past 60 years has been, at its roots, a revolt against fatherhood — the fatherhood of human fathers, of all institutions and traditions of authority, and, most importantly, of God Himself.

In this great insight, Auster explains why in our own time, men are infantilized in popular culture, why they are depicted in commercials, TV shows and movies as juvenile and useless. This denigration, and even demonizing, of grown men is a latter day manifestation of the sixties revolt against parents and patriarchy. His observation also explains why many men are immature. For without reverence for fatherhood in all its forms, they simply cannot reach maturity.

Here is the passage:

Symbolically, the father is the structuring source of our existence, whether we are speaking of male authority, of the law, of right and wrong, of our nation, of our heritage, of our civilization, of our biological nature, of our God. All these structuring principles of human life, in their different ways, are symbolically the father. The rebellion we’ve discussed is, in one form or another, a rebellion against the father. The belief that the universe is structured, intelligible, and fundamentally good, and that one can participate in this universe—this is the experience of having a father, which is the opposite of the experience of alienation that drives contemporary culture.

For the revolutionary generation of the 1960s, the psychological source of this rebellion was typically a rejection of their actual parents, because of some perceived inadequacy or betrayal. Letty Cottin Pogrebin, the feminist writer and cofounder of Ms. magazine, writes of a shameful secret her parents had kept from her until she was twelve. (more…)

ELLEN BROWN says the real problem in Venezuela is American efforts to prevent it from achieving economic sovereignty:

Venezuela and other countries that are carrying massive debts in currencies that are not their own are not sovereign. Governments that are sovereign can and have engaged in issuing their own currencies for infrastructure and development quite successfully. I have discussed a number of contemporary and historical examples in my earlier articles, including in Japan, China, Australia and Canada.

Although Venezuela is not technically at war, it is suffering from foreign currency strains triggered by aggressive attacks by a foreign power. U.S. economic sanctions have been going on for years, causing the country at least $20 billion in losses. About $7 billion of its assets are now being held hostage by the U.S., which has waged an undeclared war against Venezuelaever since George W. Bush’s failed military coup against President Hugo Chávez in 2002. Chávez boldly announced the “Bolivarian Revolution,” a series of economic and social reforms that dramatically reduced poverty and illiteracy as well as improved health and living conditions for millions of Venezuelans. The reforms, which included nationalizing key components of the nation’s economy, made Chávez a hero to millions of people and the enemy of Venezuela’s oligarchs. (more…)

THIS ARTICLE from an 1869 issue of Lippincott’s Magazine is definitely dated, but it still contains some important observations on the advantages of poverty:

The longer I contemplate Poverty, the more charms does she unveil to my entranced gaze. But is it quite right to flaunt our advantages in people’s faces, and harrow up their feelings merely because they unfortunately possess money? Doubtless it is not their fault. It was their grandfather, or a lucky thing in soldiers’ overcoats. “Where ignorance,” etc. No, let us keep ourselves to ourselves, we of the Brotherhood of Lean Purses, and only when we meet to munch together the festive crust, and drain the flowing bowl of cold water, sing this, the song of proud and independent poverty:

“My mind to me a kingdom is;

Such perfect joy therein I find
As far exceeds all earthly bliss (more…)

JAMES H. writes:

About 35 years ago I attended a party with several friends and acquaintances. An acquaintance, Alan, a graduate of the finest local schools and the Ivy Leagues was holding court and pontificating on our country’s predicament. Alan was a melancholy sort not given to enthusiasms of any kind. He possessed a morose serious air that lent credence to his various pronouncements. He acknowledged our sorry state of affairs and the troublesome trajectory our nation was on but declared that the nature of progress was such that we could expect to establish a new more stable order guaranteeing happiness for far greater numbers.  I argued that our nation’s travails could only be solved by embracing tradition, order and transcendent authority without which the centrifugal forces tearing us apart would continue to work inexorably to our detriment.

He then pulled his trump card, insisting that even were it so, “we can never go back,” that the fruits of “progress” once tasted can never be forgotten or forgone. (more…)

  ONCE AGAIN, "Pope" Francis, the fake pontiff in Rome, has been traveling far to promote his vision of the New World Order. This week he visited Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirate where Francis and Sheikh Ahmad al-Tayeb, the grand imam of an influential Egyptian mosque, Al Azhar, signed a “Document on Human Fraternity.” The document called on “all concerned to stop using religions to incite hatred, violence, extremism and blind fanaticism, and to refrain from using the name of God to justify acts of murder, exile, terrorism and oppression.” It also stated that the multiplicity of religions was willed by God. Please see the commentary at Novus Ordo Watch (here and here) as to why this is so illogical, outrageous and blasphemous, making God the author of confusion. The purpose of this post, however, is to point out that the signed document is a direct contradiction, not of the thinking (if we dare to call it that) of the man we call the Argentine Bomber -- they are fully consistent with Francis's One World Religion globalism -- but with the thinking of al-Tayeb, who has repeatedly indicated that there can only be one true faith and that serious apostates who threaten a Muslim society should be put to death. Here in this 2016 interview he explains his views on the subject of religious liberty.     Please note that al-Tayeb talks about harsh punishment for apostates, i.e., those who have left the faith,…

FROM a letter to the editor in the February issue of Culture Wars magazine, available soon here:

Like the narrative put forward by the oligarchs of the West that homosexuals are not culpable for their actions because “they were born this way,” so too the alt-right believes it itself is not morally culpable. Ultimately it’s fine with how those who bring about the “white ethnostate” behave, because the end result is being surrounded by “white people,” and therefore surrounded by “white thinking,” and the culture will then become “high trust” and advanced. This narrative is multi-layered egoism. It proclaims genetic superiority, zero personal moral culpability (unless it hinders the means to the ethnostate end), and runs purely on reactionary hatred in response to the culture war against “white guys.” Truth is, these people don’t want an “ethnostate.” They don’t even understand what ethnos is. What they want is a “biostate.” A state where the “white genes” are protected and cultivated for a mechanical and egoist position. If these genes are cultivated, then the believed end result is a “high trust” and worthwhile society. Adhering to morality, especially if it is perceived to go against the interests of establishing this biostate, is the product of weakness or backwards caveman religiosity, unable to see a greater “abstract morality.” (more…)

  SUSAN-ANNE WHITE writes from Northern Ireland: I have contacted you in the recent past about Megan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, because I believe she is promoting a feminist and sexual revolutionary agenda. Of course her husband Prince Harry is just like her as are most members of the Royal Family. However she is an aggressive agitator and never misses an opportunity to cheapen and coarsen an already depraved society. The video below reveals what she got up to last week. The title accompanying the video says it all. The words "sex workers" is a euphemism. They are prostitutes. The Bible calls such women whores and their wicked clients "whoremongers." Prostitution should be illegal everywhere and those engaged in it and their "clients" should be prosecuted and identified. Mrs Wood, I hope you and your readers share my concerns about this disturbing woman.  

  WE LIVE in an era of faith. Too much faith. Far too many people live on faith exclusively. Faith is the acceptance of a belief on the authority of someone else. For instance, I have never been to Athens, Greece, but I take it on the authority of many others that it exists. Faith should never work against reason. The problem arises when faith overcomes all reason. Here's one example. Many learn the idea from others that God doesn't exist, even though the existence of God can without much difficulty be proven with the use of reason. But instead of reasoning it out, they take it entirely on faith that God doesn't exist. And off they go. College professors tell students that humans -- who think and speak -- evolved from organisms that cannot think or speak. And, on faith alone, without troubling to reason it out, people swallow this patently ridiculous idea that has never been verified scientifically. It has spread in the same way a false rumor spreads. It excites people and they believe it. Most people in history would have shaken their heads in wonder if they could have foreseen that a belief like this would someday have universal acclaim. It would have instantly disproven to them that intellectual progress is inevitable. People are told that the differences between the sexes are unnatural and can be almost totally eliminated. On the authority of others, despite all the…

THE VAST majority of people in our world has retained some kind of conviction, however shadowy, in the immortality of the soul. “Well, wherever he is now, I’m sure he’s happy,” people might say at a funeral (or a “celebration of life”). This conviction is the legacy of centuries of a Christian (i.e., Catholic) social order that no longer exists. Very few Westerners believe in reincarnation or total oblivion.

However, most also believe that it is only just and fair that someone who is basically decent should be happy in the afterlife. By basically decent, I mean someone who fulfills many duties to family and friends, never breaks the law, has defects but is good-hearted and likeable. It greatly offends modern sensibilities to suggest that this kind of niceness and decency is not necessarily rewarded by God with eternal happiness or that the person could even be punished.

The problem with the presumption that everyone nice goes to heaven is, it’s not what God has revealed about eternity. It substitutes human judgment for divine reason.

It also doesn’t make sense.

Heaven is not earth. It is a supernatural state. In order to pass from the natural into the supernatural sphere, we must acquire supernatural virtues, which are more akin to goodness directed toward God than to humans. In order to qualify for the Olympic Games, to use one analogy, one must meet certain athletic qualifications. The belief that someone can get to Heaven because they have been generally decent and good is similar to the belief that someone who is a great software engineer should be able to compete in the decathlon.

To take another analogy, in order to live on Mars, we need oxygen. In order to live in heaven, we need spiritual oxygen, which is a supernatural gift — a gift from God we can refuse or accept — and involves not just works but faith. (more…)

  MICHAEL S. writes: I sometimes pass this ad on my way to work. I think of you, of course -- although there is no similarity. This is Sixth Avenue and 47th Street in Manhattan— the so-called "Diamond District" — you know, home, in a sense, of the engagement ring scam. Interesting that the word "marriage" does not come to mind when viewing this ad. Because as far as she is concerned, it is not even a question. Laura writes: From the kitchen into Hell's Kitchen --- the Hell's Kitchen of perpetual indebtedness. Feminism has made women easy prey to lending schemes. See Zippy's Usury FAQ to learn why the student loan (and all the related predatory financing as advertised in this billboard) is wrong -- for the lender, not the borrower -- and is similar to the indentured servitude of the past. In fact, it's worse because of the interest rates. The birthrate among Millennials is lower than even expected and one of the reasons (though not the main reason) is the student loan. It's institutionalized infertility.