JOE KOVACS writes at World Net Daily:

The decision by FBI Director James Comey to reopen the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email server and her mishandling of classified material came after he could no longer resist mounting pressure by FBI agents described as “mutinous.” Read More »

THIS Sunday, when Catholics observe the Feast of Christ the King, which recognizes the sacred truth that Jesus Christ has royal prerogatives not just over the hearts of men, but over the social order too, is a fitting occasion to pray for the election of Donald Trump.

It may seem contradictory. Trump is not a saint. And it’s not as if he is going to install a Catholic government. He isn’t even Catholic. But he is something of a miracle. After the intense destruction of the Obama presidency, God sent us someone with the strength to battle the hydra of globalism and the fanatical intolerance of political correctness. I have gained much respect for Trump, despite all his weaknesses, and will vote for him without hesitation next week. He is still standing after being attacked relentlessly. His enemies are our enemies. (His enemies include, by the way, the most dangerous man on the planet — the false pontiff, “Pope” Francis. See details of his latest interview here. How can any Catholic who is not in a coma listen to Francis-talk and still mistake this man for one of the faithful, let alone a “Pope?”)

Trump stands between us and the despotism of an extremely evil woman who chillingly champions the killing of even late-term infants in the womb; wants the further erasure of American borders and sovereignty; is a proven crook; has every intention of creating her dream socialist utopia by force; speaks of launching military attacks in response to cyber attacks and is openly provoking the world’s second major nuclear power.

While he may not make America great, he could make it better and prevent it from becoming a living hell. Let’s pray that the immense popularity Donald Trump enjoys is honored at the polls one week from Tuesday, and he becomes our next president.

[Update: Another sermon by Father William Jenkins on the election can be found here. He discusses what he believes is the possibility of civil war and the subsequent establishment of martial law.”These are things that should make us pray. … We need to be very, very concerned about the point where the country stands now.” He also further discusses — and justifies — voting for “the lesser of two evils.” He suggests we have a moral obligation to vote for Trump.]

Read More »

JON RAPPOPORT writes:

The point of modern education, more and more, is the GROUP.

“Good people belong to the group.”

“The Group is everything.”

“If you don’t belong to the Group, you have a mental disorder.”

Why is all this emphasis put on the Group?

The answer to that question also gives you the reason logic isn’t taught in schools anymore:

The independent self-sufficient individual is being phased out.

The independent individual who knows how to think and make lucid judgments on his own is a threat to the EMERGING RELIGION OF GLOBALISM.

The emerging religion of Globalism is a fuzzy image of THE GROUP.

I’M SURPRISED Donald Trump has not gotten a hard time for his previous comments on housewives:

“I have more respect for a great homemaker as a wife than I do [for] a wife who’s a good wife and a good businessperson,” Trump said in the episode, which aired on A&E. “I have far more respect for a homemaker because in many respects I think it’s tougher. I think it’s a lot harder to beautifully bring up a family.”

“Most women would agree with me,” Trump said.

Hillary, obviously, does not agree.

THOUGH DONALD Trump would ideally put a check on mass immigration, globalist economics and the power of the corporate media, he cannot make America great.

No nation can be great when its families are weak (not to mention when it is constantly at war). American families are extremely weak. No advanced society in history has survived for long with this level of family breakdown, voluntary childlessness, rejection of the complementary roles of men and women, and sheer confusion. If you can provide evidence otherwise, I will entertain it. In his private life, Trump has set a bad example. That is true no matter how successful his children are. His presidency — the best outcome of this election — would promote that bad example.

But the problem goes beyond his private life. Trump may, in the best of all worlds, make the economic conditions of families somewhat better. But that would not solve the more fundamental problems caused by hyper-individualism, promiscuity, childlessness and disloyalty. Trump has no solutions for an atomistic society in which the individual pursuit of happiness is paramount. In fact, he promotes it.

America cannot be great when the family structure is this weak. Nations are based on love.

A plastic purse for carrying America’s most cherished food product.

Source

BK writes:

I received this ‘invitation’ within the hour:

‘We hope you’ll be able to join us at a livestream this October 31st, as we watch His Holiness Pope Francis, Lutheran World Federation President Bishop Munib A. Younan, and General Secretary Rev. Martin Junge lead the common prayer service in Lund, Sweden, and the public symposium that follows in Malmö, Sweden.’ Read More »

M. OLIVER HEYDORN writes at the Clifford Douglas Institute website:

We live now in an age of mass migrations and of rumours of mass migrations. With the term ‘mass migration’ we are referring, of course, to the movement, not merely of large numbers of people, but of whole groups of people, who constitute various racial-cultural gestalts, en masse from one nation or region to another. When it comes to explaining why this mass migration has been occurring, why it is, on the whole, a negative phenomenon, and what can be done to reduce migratory flows to saner proportions and saner forms, Social Credit theory has much to contribute to the public discourse.

See my previous post on Social Credit theory here. Social Credit aims to create an adequate flow of debt-free money in the economy and provide “national dividends” to citizens so that, among other things, the shortage of jobs caused by technological innovation does not result in a pervasive shortage of money. In Heydorn’s words, Social Credit is a “radical type of monetary reform that is specifically designed to subordinate the activities of the group to the well-being of each individual member of economic association (thus liberating the individual from the domination of the group – and from the domination of the elite who control the group – that currently characterizes economic life). ”

Heydorn continues in the above post:

Respect for the organic, i.e., that which arises spontaneously from within, is a hallmark of Social Credit philosophy and policy. Social Credit’s great objection to mass migration and to the type of multicultural societies which mass migration produces is the thoroughly inorganic character of both. People do not fall prey to a spontaneous desire to permanently uproot themselves by journeying thousands of miles away from home, often inter-continentally, because they have an overwhelming wish to enrich someone else’s culture or for the love of travel. They do it because the reigning financial system (amongst other possible factors) makes it difficult, if not extremely difficult, for many people to achieve a decent standard of living in their own countries of origin. The more well-to-do nations are all too eager to welcome these immigrants, who may be likened to ‘refugees’ fleeing financial oppression, as potential economic adjuncts. Provided that the money is forthcoming, these people will produce and above all consume, thus helping to satisfy the need for continual economic growth. [cont.]

WESLEY MORRIS, pop culture critic and Pulitzer Prize recipient, acclaimed as a latter-day Oscar Wilde, writes in the pages of The New York Times that American culture does not pay sufficient reverence to the black male sexual organ. Seriously.

Nothing is beneath the Times — absolutely nothing — when it comes to promoting racial division and dragging America into the gutter.

JAMES N. writes:

This is a “pumping pod” at the Atlanta Airport so that businesspeople, salespeople, managers and lawyers can pump in privacy between flights.

God forbid that anything should deter the needs of commerce.

Virgin and Child, Francesco di Stefano

ANOTHER day, another blasphemy from Frank the Fake:

“Practice and teach this prayer, for to ask and beg for consolation is the main service of joy,” Francis noted. “Joy is constitutive of the gospel message … good news cannot be given with a sad face.”

As anyone with the slightest familiarity with Catholic history knows, and as these paintings show, the good news has been given with a sad face.

Ecce Homo, Andrea Mantegna, c. 1500

A STORY you won’t find in The New York Times.

See many more cases here.

FEMINISTS, if they were true to their stated goal of obtaining recognition and compensation for women based on merit, should be deeply offended by anyone — man or woman — who says he will vote for Hillary Clinton simply because she is a woman. This idea should outrage feminists.

For being a woman in itself is not something with which a woman can be credited. She had nothing to do with the simple fact that she is a woman. Her character is something she creates, not her sex. There are all kinds of women. If they were true to their stated goal, feminists would be hyper-vigilant and discriminating when it comes to electing any woman. “No, we don’t want just a woman,” they would say. “We want the best.”

But they don’t say that. I realize that many, probably most, feminists believe Hillary is the best, but they typically don’t object to those who want Hillary to be president purely because she is a woman. And therefore, their alleged goal is cheapened by a tendency to assign virtue to the mere physical fact of being a woman, which perhaps explains why Hillary’s character, formed under this halo, is so poor.

Diana Johnstone, the liberal author of Queen of Chaos: The Misadventures of Hillary Clinton, responded to the notion of voting for Hillary purely because she is a woman. She was speaking to a liberal audience: Read More »

TK writes:

I remember not believing the polls in the last presidential election. I actually thought Romney would win in a landslide. I remember my disbelief when state after state started falling into the blue column. I couldn’t believe that this country would re-elect Obama, knowing so much more about him this time around than was known about him the last time. It made no sense to me. But it was what it was.

Here we are again. Polls, polls polls, almost all oversampling Democrats, some by a pretty decent margin. If we’re to believe them this time, we have to believe that the country wants more Democrat policies. Read More »

Boston Globe/ Jim Davis

A RHODE ISLAND man criticized the pervasiveness of yoga pants on women last week in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper. As a result, his home in Barrington was reportedly sieged this weekend, with hundreds of women walking past his house with bullhorns, flags, signs and an arsenal of feminist platitudes, in a flash mob generated on social media.

Alan Sorrentino, the letter writer, said he has also received death threats. Well, of course, he deserves a death sentence. He’s an enemy of women.  Apparently, Mr. Sorrentino, 63, has been living in a cave. How else could he not know that it is all but a capital crime to criticize the ugly, sexually aggressive clothing offered by a decadent, corporate fashion industry that doesn’t care if women look like slabs of meat and purveys everything feminists have ever decried as the “objectification” of women?

The Boston Globe quotes from the letter:

‘‘Yoga pants belong in the yoga studio,’’ he wrote. ‘‘What’s next? Wearing a ‘‘Speedo’’ to the supermarket? Imagine if men did that. Yuck!’’

Sorrentino wrote that it’s ‘‘bizarre and disturbing’’ to see the outfits on ‘‘mature, adult women,’’ noting that it’s ‘‘usually paired with a blousy top and a pony tail hairdo.’’ He said it’s the worst thing to happen in women’s fashion since the miniskirt. He said women should wear a ‘‘nice pair of tailored slacks’’ or jeans instead.

[…]

He told women who wear yoga pants that he’s struggling with his own physicality as he ages and said, ‘‘I don’t want to struggle with yours.’’

Mr. Sorrentino later defended himself by saying he was just joking and that only a “tormented, uptight individual” would criticize what women wear. He is scared. Men are understandably scared of yoga-practicing, peace-loving feminist bullies who have the multi-billion dollar corporate media, the American government and the entire political establishment behind them. Sorrentino probably is a “tormented, uptight individual,” and he certainly didn’t go far enough. He should have totally condemned the public wearing of yoga pants, not just on older women. Though most women don’t intend it, the clingy and revealing synthetic pants, which would have been considered not all that long ago no more acceptable in public than underwear, are a form of sexual aggression. They draw excessive attention toward their bodies — and thus away from their personalities. (Mr. Sorrentino might have also done the world a service by criticizing yoga itself, a practice which encourages resignation, a practice which, though connected to a noble contemplative tradition, presents the divine as an impersonal force, no more interesting than a rock, and is partly response for the Closing of the American Mind.)

Attendees of the march said they would not endure “policing” of women’s bodies — as if criticism was coercion, as if words constituted a jail sentence.

We need more tormented, uptight individuals to stand up to these bullies who don’t realize that what they wear affects other people and is a social statement. Yoga pants worn in public undermine the dignity of women. They make a statement: women are hunks of meat, rather than potentially elevated beings with a noble mission in this world. They are anti-feminine and cruel to women who don’t have the slim and sleek bodies idolized by our culture. Furthermore, they are depressing — black uniforms devoid of decorative interest — and thus they further undermine the dignity of women everywhere and contribute to the pervasive ugliness of our environment.

THE VOTE, writes Thomas Droleskey, has long been rigged:

Actual election fraud has been a common phenomenon in the history of this nation. The stuffing of ballot boxes was common in the nineteenth century when paper ballots were used. Voters were intimidated by means of physical threats. People voted two or three times. Ballots cast for some candidates were thrown out or burned. Dead people voted, a phenomenon still to be found in certain precincts in the country. Most of the popular vote totals of the nineteenth century are merely advisory. They do not truly reflect the actual votes cast by voters. Read More »

HILLARY CLINTON has flouted the law so brazenly that if she wins the election, her presidency will be of questionable legitimacy. Mike Adams writes:

Every element of this election is so rigged, so illegal and so fraudulent that if Hillary Clinton “wins” this vote, the Presidency of the United States will be null and void.

From Zero Hedge:

“That an establishment democratic candidate could endure an extended FBI investigation, in which multiple federal laws were clearly and intentionally broken, and clear evidence of corruption and collusion between the FBI and State Department is mind boggling. Throw in evidence from WikiLeaks clearly linking the DNC to criminal efforts to incite violence at rallies, numerous examples of pay-to-play activities at the Clinton Foundation, blatant media collusion, etc, etc, and it actually becomes quite frightening.” Read More »

WAYNE MADSEN contends there is no evidence that the Russian government hacked e-mails of Hillary Clinton and her staffers. Most likely, it was done by those attempting to gain entry to files pertaining to UFOs:

[C]entral Intelligence Agency director John Brennan, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and National Security Agency director Admiral Mike Rogers provided not one iota of evidence that it was Russian state players who hacked into the computers of the Democrats or the personal email accounts of Hillary Clinton campaign manager John Podesta and other staffers.

Podesta has a long track record of interest in extraterrestrial visitations of our planet and unidentified flying objects (UFOs) and the files the U.S. government possesses on these subjects. Consequently, Podesta, who has served as White House chief of staff for Presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, has drawn the interest of the most dedicated contingent among the computer hacker community: those who hope to discover the “mother lode” of secret files allegedly held by the U.S. government on alien visitations and UFOs.

Clinton’s unsupported and provocative claim that Russia is interfering in the election is a form of treason. Read More »