"In times past, women led the protests against wars. Mother's Day was originally an anti-war statement. The militant "All Men Are Rapists"feminism of the 1990s was created to trick all women into hating all men; to destroy any sympathy by women for men, to make it easier for the government to send men off to die by the thousands in the wars we see before us today." ---   Michael Rivero

FROM Mark Glenn at The Ugly Truth: [E]ven if Trump wins all can be confident of the fact that Israel and her various tentacles spread throughout the world are going to do their damndest in frustrating him at every turn. Whether it is a monetary collapse or a nuclear weapon being detonated within an American city that is then blamed on Russia, all those who are looking at a Trump presidency with even an ounce of hope need to curb their enthusiasm by recognizing the fact that the Titanic struck the iceberg a long time ago and the only question that remains now is how many people are going to find a spot on the lifeboats which are/will be in very short supply.

REPORTERS for major news outlets, including The New York Times and MSNBC, met with the Clinton campaign in April to discuss "framing the HRC message and framing the race." This article lists the reporters (but erroneously says they were on the Clinton "payroll").

JOE KOVACS writes at World Net Daily:

The decision by FBI Director James Comey to reopen the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email server and her mishandling of classified material came after he could no longer resist mounting pressure by FBI agents described as “mutinous.” (more…)

THIS Sunday, when Catholics observe the Feast of Christ the King, which recognizes the sacred truth that Jesus Christ has royal prerogatives not just over the hearts of men, but over the social order too, is a fitting occasion to pray for the election of Donald Trump.

It may seem contradictory. Trump is not a saint. And it’s not as if he is going to install a Catholic government. He isn’t even Catholic. But he is something of a miracle. After the intense destruction of the Obama presidency, God sent us someone with the strength to battle the hydra of globalism and the fanatical intolerance of political correctness. I have gained much respect for Trump, despite all his weaknesses, and will vote for him without hesitation next week. He is still standing after being attacked relentlessly. His enemies are our enemies. (His enemies include, by the way, the most dangerous man on the planet — the false pontiff, “Pope” Francis. See details of his latest interview here. How can any Catholic who is not in a coma listen to Francis-talk and still mistake this man for one of the faithful, let alone a “Pope?”)

Trump stands between us and the despotism of an extremely evil woman who chillingly champions the killing of even late-term infants in the womb; wants the further erasure of American borders and sovereignty; is a proven crook; has every intention of creating her dream socialist utopia by force; speaks of launching military attacks in response to cyber attacks and is openly provoking the world’s second major nuclear power.

While he may not make America great, he could make it better and prevent it from becoming a living hell. Let’s pray that the immense popularity Donald Trump enjoys is honored at the polls one week from Tuesday, and he becomes our next president.

[Update: Another sermon by Father William Jenkins on the election can be found here. He discusses what he believes is the possibility of civil war and the subsequent establishment of martial law.”These are things that should make us pray. … We need to be very, very concerned about the point where the country stands now.” He also further discusses — and justifies — voting for “the lesser of two evils.” He suggests we have a moral obligation to vote for Trump.]

(more…)

JON RAPPOPORT writes: The point of modern education, more and more, is the GROUP. “Good people belong to the group.” “The Group is everything.” “If you don’t belong to the Group, you have a mental disorder.” Why is all this emphasis put on the Group? The answer to that question also gives you the reason logic isn’t taught in schools anymore: The independent self-sufficient individual is being phased out. The independent individual who knows how to think and make lucid judgments on his own is a threat to the EMERGING RELIGION OF GLOBALISM. The emerging religion of Globalism is a fuzzy image of THE GROUP.

I'M SURPRISED Donald Trump has not gotten a hard time for his previous comments on housewives: “I have more respect for a great homemaker as a wife than I do [for] a wife who’s a good wife and a good businessperson,” Trump said in the episode, which aired on A&E. “I have far more respect for a homemaker because in many respects I think it’s tougher. I think it’s a lot harder to beautifully bring up a family.” “Most women would agree with me,” Trump said. Hillary, obviously, does not agree.

THOUGH DONALD Trump would ideally put a check on mass immigration, globalist economics and the power of the corporate media, he cannot make America great. No nation can be great when its families are weak (not to mention when it is constantly at war). American families are extremely weak. No advanced society in history has survived for long with this level of family breakdown, voluntary childlessness, rejection of the complementary roles of men and women, and sheer confusion. If you can provide evidence otherwise, I will entertain it. In his private life, Trump has set a bad example. That is true no matter how successful his children are. His presidency -- the best outcome of this election -- would promote that bad example. But the problem goes beyond his private life. Trump may, in the best of all worlds, make the economic conditions of families somewhat better. But that would not solve the more fundamental problems caused by hyper-individualism, promiscuity, childlessness and disloyalty. Trump has no solutions for an atomistic society in which the individual pursuit of happiness is paramount. In fact, he promotes it. America cannot be great when the family structure is this weak. Nations are based on love.

A plastic purse for carrying America's most cherished food product. Source

BK writes:

I received this ‘invitation’ within the hour:

‘We hope you’ll be able to join us at a livestream this October 31st, as we watch His Holiness Pope Francis, Lutheran World Federation President Bishop Munib A. Younan, and General Secretary Rev. Martin Junge lead the common prayer service in Lund, Sweden, and the public symposium that follows in Malmö, Sweden.’ (more…)

M. OLIVER HEYDORN writes at the Clifford Douglas Institute website: We live now in an age of mass migrations and of rumours of mass migrations. With the term ‘mass migration’ we are referring, of course, to the movement, not merely of large numbers of people, but of whole groups of people, who constitute various racial-cultural gestalts, en masse from one nation or region to another. When it comes to explaining why this mass migration has been occurring, why it is, on the whole, a negative phenomenon, and what can be done to reduce migratory flows to saner proportions and saner forms, Social Credit theory has much to contribute to the public discourse. See my previous post on Social Credit theory here. Social Credit aims to create an adequate flow of debt-free money in the economy and provide "national dividends" to citizens so that, among other things, the shortage of jobs caused by technological innovation does not result in a pervasive shortage of money. In Heydorn's words, Social Credit is a "radical type of monetary reform that is specifically designed to subordinate the activities of the group to the well-being of each individual member of economic association (thus liberating the individual from the domination of the group – and from the domination of the elite who control the group – that currently characterizes economic life). " Heydorn continues in the above post: Respect for the organic, i.e., that which arises spontaneously from within, is…

WESLEY MORRIS, pop culture critic and Pulitzer Prize recipient, acclaimed as a latter-day Oscar Wilde, writes in the pages of The New York Times that American culture does not pay sufficient reverence to the black male sexual organ. Seriously. Nothing is beneath the Times -- absolutely nothing -- when it comes to promoting racial division and dragging America into the gutter.

JAMES N. writes: This is a "pumping pod" at the Atlanta Airport so that businesspeople, salespeople, managers and lawyers can pump in privacy between flights. God forbid that anything should deter the needs of commerce.

  ANOTHER day, another blasphemy from Frank the Fake: "Practice and teach this prayer, for to ask and beg for consolation is the main service of joy," Francis noted. "Joy is constitutive of the gospel message ... good news cannot be given with a sad face." As anyone with the slightest familiarity with Catholic history knows, and as these paintings show, the good news has been given with a sad face.

A STORY you won't find in The New York Times. See many more cases here.

FEMINISTS, if they were true to their stated goal of obtaining recognition and compensation for women based on merit, should be deeply offended by anyone — man or woman — who says he will vote for Hillary Clinton simply because she is a woman. This idea should outrage feminists.

For being a woman in itself is not something with which a woman can be credited. She had nothing to do with the simple fact that she is a woman. Her character is something she creates, not her sex. There are all kinds of women. If they were true to their stated goal, feminists would be hyper-vigilant and discriminating when it comes to electing any woman. “No, we don’t want just a woman,” they would say. “We want the best.”

But they don’t say that. I realize that many, probably most, feminists believe Hillary is the best, but they typically don’t object to those who want Hillary to be president purely because she is a woman. And therefore, their alleged goal is cheapened by a tendency to assign virtue to the mere physical fact of being a woman, which perhaps explains why Hillary’s character, formed under this halo, is so poor.

Diana Johnstone, the liberal author of Queen of Chaos: The Misadventures of Hillary Clinton, responded to the notion of voting for Hillary purely because she is a woman. She was speaking to a liberal audience: (more…)

TK writes:

I remember not believing the polls in the last presidential election. I actually thought Romney would win in a landslide. I remember my disbelief when state after state started falling into the blue column. I couldn’t believe that this country would re-elect Obama, knowing so much more about him this time around than was known about him the last time. It made no sense to me. But it was what it was.

Here we are again. Polls, polls polls, almost all oversampling Democrats, some by a pretty decent margin. If we’re to believe them this time, we have to believe that the country wants more Democrat policies. (more…)