LAST WEEK, five friends of the writer Lawrence Auster, who died in March of last year, gathered at his graveside at Sts. Peter and Paul Cemetery in Springfield, Pennsylvania to mark the placing of a new tombstone at the site. We all continue to miss him, but it was a happy occasion to be there together and remember the man who so inspired us and truly was the greatest of friends. Afterward, we went to a restaurant nearby and talked about Mr. Auster’s work and life. We agreed that we would all visit his grave together once a year.

Thank you to the readers of View from the Right and to Auster family members who contributed to this beautiful monument made of Vermont granite. I wish to thank especially a reader from New Orleans who contributed $1,000.

AMERICAN plutocrats, in league with pharmaceutical interests, have been in the business of controlling the fertility of the lower orders for many decades now. The Rockefeller Foundation began to seriously work in this vein in the 1940s with its Population Council, at a time when the fecundity of Catholic families became a serious political concern and threat to the powers-that-be. Now Bill Gates is forging into new territory. According to Lifesitenews:

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is funding the development of a contraceptive microchip that can be remotely controlled to release hormones that can act as abortifacients into a woman’s body for up to 16 years. Both the chip’s potential to take a life and the potential privacy concerns have drawn criticism.

The chip, which measures 20 x 20 x 7 millimeters, can be implanted under the skin of a woman’s buttocks, upper arm, or abdomen in 30 minutes. The device contains a 16-year reservoir of the drug levonorgestrel, releasing 30 micrograms a day – but the dosage can be altered by remote control, as well. Read More »

ROGER writes:

I tried looking up this word which appears on your site, but could not find a definition for it. What does it mean?

Read More »

BUCK writes:

It appears that science is now “good enough” to make the claim that children of same-sex “parents” are, in some ways, happier and healthier than children parented by their gender-role trapped biological mums and dads.

Read More »

JEWEL writes:

Here is  a beautiful essay by Anthony Esolen about friendship — normal friendship between men, and how the culture of sodomy has basically ruined it for everyone:

“A Requiem for Friendship”

ANN BARNHARDT has some incisive lines on this subject:

Should wives be subject to their husbands, as St. Paul exhorts? You’re damn right they should. All day, every day. The fact that this question even has to be asked is, by itself, evidence of how far gone our culture is. I truly believe that most people in Western Civilization go through their entire lives without ever actually experiencing love. They experience lust, and they experience various forms of attachment, but most people never actually love. To love IS TO SUBMIT. To love is to make oneself SUBJECT TO ANOTHER. To love is to freely choose to put another above yourself, to literally live for another. Within the context of marriage this dynamic of total self-gift obviously meant to flow in BOTH DIRECTIONS (as the love between God the Father and God the Son, and between Christ and the Church) and is equally expected of men vis-a-vis their wives.

The reason St. Paul went out of his way to specifically admonish wives to remember to submit to their husbands is because women have the greater tendency to slip into self-absorbed nagging shrewishness and take for granted the fruits of their husbands’ labors because those labors are usually done away from the home, and are thus invisible to the wife. A man married to a woman on a reality show about shrewish, materialistic wives (Real Housewives of Beverly Hills) just committed suicide because he was run into massive debt by his wife’s ostentatious and utterly avaricious lifestyle demands, and was also having his character assassinated on national television BY HIS WIFE. This woman didn’t love her husband or submit herself to him, she rode him, never sparing the whip, until she literally killed him. This is the opposite of love. This is evil. It isn’t a victory for the so-called liberation of womankind. It is a scathing indictment of our demonically perverted feminist culture.

Well said — with characteristic Barnhardtian directness and capitalized words. However, the Theology of Body concept of “total self-gift” is problematic. It is, in fact, a feminist concept in which submission isn’t really submission because husband and wife are ONE. In reality, marriage is not fusion or self-obliteration. Man and wife remain separate beings.

Read More »

VINCENT writes:

Well, congratulations.

You have inspired me to write the first hatemail of my life. As far as they go, this one is going to be quite mild.

The article that you wrote two years ago about deceased astronaut Sally Ride (which has come to my attention through the site Fundies say the Darndest Things) is petty. It could have been pettier. It could have been stupider. It could have been eviler.

But it still was petty, stupid, and yes, evil, and your core argument is fundamentally flawed.

Read More »

BEN J. writes:

I was delighted to read Thomas F. Bertonneau’s comments on the growing popularity of tattoos and scarification.

He writes: “People who cultivate the soul by cultivating the virtues – and who do so by engaging actively in civilized institutions – gain identity and differentiate themselves non-invidiously through the fostering of their God-given gifts and the application of knowledge and skills.” I had to look up “invidious,” but I believe Dr. Bertonneau is on to something very important. Calculated to cause offence, envy, that is perhaps the best explanation I have seen. I think this carries over to many aspects of modern culture, I see it in not just tattoos but also branding of consumer products.

Read More »

DON VINCENZO writes:

The Fourth of July 1916, Childe Hassam

THOMAS F. BERTONNEAU writes:

In the spirit of the day, here is a link to a performance of the third movement, The Fourth of July, from the New England Holidays Symphony by American composer Charles Ives (1874 – 1954), composed whenever Ives could take a break from the insurance business between 1897 and 1913.  Ives was a New Englander, born in Danbury, Connecticut, whose father had been a military bandmaster during the Civil War.  The music of Ives remains difficult for many people.  My approach to it is to regard it, quite as the composer intended it to be, as a record of experience.  In the case of The Fourth of July, Ives gives us in sound what a boy would have heard during the twenty-four hours of the Independence Day celebration.  Bands are playing in different parts of the city park and their melodies and rhythms overlap.  Choirs sing patriotic and commemorative hymns.  Finally, the boys get hold of matches and manage to set off the fireworks display prematurely, but to good effect nevertheless.

Read More »

KEITH writes:

As many of your readers know, last Sunday, June 29th, the mainstream media decided the hot topic over the weekend was the success of all the “gay pride” parades and events put on to celebrate and honor the seemingly “oppressed” of our dear nation.  And while I’m truly touched at the ‘nobleness’ of my entire country to honor those brave souls and, um, ‘heroes’, who endure such discrimination and hard, hard, oppression, I’m here to inform you that while the rest of the nation ‘celebrated’ these events, there was a group of young ladies who thought it was better to celebrate and honor something, or somebody, else.

Seventy young girls from the American Heritage Girls organization came from as far as Hawaii and Alaska to meet at Arlington National Cemetery to pay honor to our real fallen heroes, and lay a ceremonial wreath at The Tomb Of The Unknown Soldier. After the ceremony, they then were given special permission to perform in the Memorial Amphitheater.  The seventy-girl choir, who individually studied their parts for two weeks via Internet, and then met for only three hours of rehearsals beforehand, sang  “The Star Spangled Banner” and “America.”

Many blessings and Happy 4th of July!!!

THERE is a pizza recipe for every occasion. This one features a tube of refrigerated pizza crust; two slices of processed American cheese; four sticks of string cheese, cut in half lengthwise; and one jar of pizza sauce.

A delightful variation on a delightful theme.

HURRICANE BETSY writes:

If anyone in your household should accidentally ingest spoiled food, here’s the cure!  Guaranteed by me to work instantaneously!

Read More »

THIS July Fourth promotional photo for Microsoft Outlook is a vivid example of corporate globalism and its agenda to erase borders and eradicate national identity. Not that there should be no Asians celebrating July Fourth or that there should be no Japanese or Vietnamese or Chinese citizens of America. But the incessant promotion of multiculturalism by the corporate world, of which this is but one small example, is obnoxious. Imagine the Japanese publicly celebrating their national holiday with photos of white people from, say, Kansas carrying Japanese flags. You can’t imagine it. That’s because the Japanese recognize that they are not just a political entity or a commercial entity but a people with a shared history and extended kinship. And the world does not accuse them of exclusiveness because of this. There really is no such thing as a multiracial nation in the sense that modern multiculturalism would have it. Why does America allow the corporate world to insist that there is? They do because liberty is our founding ethic. Freedom is intoxicating. Freedom calls out to every American, indeed every citizen of the world. It’s a torch held high, drawing all to its magnificent light.

Read More »

SHEFALI writes:

This must be a first. Indra K. Noyi, the CEO of PepsiCo, an Indian trailblazer to boot, confesses she did not have it all. Neither can any woman who aspires to her kind of success.

Happy Fourth of July weekend to you and your family!

Read More »

FOR Algerians in Paris, the World Cup means riots. Riot if your team wins. Riot if your team loses. And riot if it’s a tie. There is an endless supply of cars to be torched.

Read about the latest at Gallawatch.

“FREE” contraceptives and abortion-causing drugs, distributed via government fiat, are the ultimate expression of what the writer E. Michael Jones, borrowing a phrase from St. Augustine, called libido dominandi. In Jones’s definition, libido dominandi is the drive for political control through sexual freedom. In his book of the same name, Jones wrote that a regime of sexual liberation is one of bondage, rendering citizens distracted and controlled by their passions and the havoc that results. In his preface to Brave New World, a fictitious rendition of this rule, Aldous Huxley wrote, “As political and economic freedom diminishes, sexual freedom tends compensatingly to increase.”

In the libido dominandi society, we are told that the natural functions of a woman’s body are a threat to her health. Bureaucrats routinely utter this ridiculous falsehood and no one bats an eye, which is why this nation of libidinous serfs and contraceptive poppers, who do not even notice how thoroughly unprecedented this all is in the history of humankind, will be despised by the unhappy few in forthcoming generations.

Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court, in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, ruled that family-owned corporations are exempt from the “Affordable Care Act’s” requirement that they must provide insurance coverage for drugs that terminate the lives of human beings in the womb. This is news that should be put under the file: “It Could Be Much, Much Worse, But Things Are Still Very, Very Bad.” Corporations have had to request permission from the federal government to exempt themselves from encouraging and facilitating population control and the pharmaceutical murder of unborn children. We are far advanced down the road to serfdom despite this ruling. Read More »

THOMAS F. BERTONNEAU writes:

Philoscribe’s description of the trio waiting in queue at the hair salon is full of interest: “One was a hideously overweight woman, her arms encased in a sleeve of tattoos that extended across her exposed upper chest.  The second was a man in his early 20s with a ring under his nostril and washer-size rings in the lobes of his ears.  The third [was] a man in his 40s… wearing the male equivalent of a tank top T-shirt, baggy cargo shorts and sandals that amply exposed his corpulent physique and body hair.”

While (yes, yes, and yes) corpulence is sometimes an organic condition, difficult to control, usually it is a consequence of indiscipline and bad diet.  In my earlier comments on tattooing, I argued that the tattoo is a desperate attempt to be someone undertaken by a subject who believes that he lacks a noticeable identity.  Tattoos serve this function in archaic societies, where they signify social status, but so does corpulence.  Read More »