THE NEW YORKER magazine portrays on its cover the Sesame Street characters Bert and Ernie as a homosexual couple watching television, with an image of the Supreme Court on the screen. I guess we're supposed to think this is clever. The New Yorker has been junk for many years and it will never rise again. It now serves merely to document the triviality, immorality, rage and low-brow taste of the late American liberal intellectual.

LIZA MUNDY in the June issue of The Atlantic argues that homosexuals will make marriage better for everyone because they will free society at last from the burden of traditional sex roles. This is a remarkable piece even in a world of remarkably vile nonsense. Mundy writes:

What if same-sex marriage does change marriage, but primarily for the better? For one thing, there is reason to think that, rather than making marriage more fragile, the boom of publicity around same-sex weddings could awaken among heterosexuals a new interest in the institution, at least for a time. But the larger change might be this: by providing a new model of how two people can live together equitably, same-sex marriage could help haul matrimony more fully into the 21st century. Although marriage is in many ways fairer and more pleasurable for both men and women than it once was, it hasn’t entirely thrown off old notions and habits. As a result, many men and women enter into it burdened with assumptions and stereotypes that create stress and resentment. Others, confronted with these increasingly anachronistic expectations—expectations at odds with the economic and practical realities of their own lives—don’t enter into it at all. (more…)

IN 2010, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation ran a glowing article, “Two Dads Are Better than One,” about two homosexual men living in Australia who had adopted a baby boy from Russia. The blogger Wintery Knight has the full text of the article, which has allegedly been pulled from the Internet. The piece is similar to countless others about the wonders of homosexual “parenthood” and the deep desire to become “fathers.” The article begins:

A shiny child’s bike lies on its side on the front lawn of an immaculate garden.

Around the back gay dads Pete and Mark chase their son’s pet chickens around, trying to catch them.

Drake, 5, exclaims that the little birds are too fast for him.

It’s a happy, relaxed family scene. But it wasn’t an easy road to get there. After many hurdles Drake was born by surrogacy in Russia. (more…)

SPENCER WARREN writes:

One hundred fifty years ago this week, one of the most fateful events in the history of our nation took place.

At Gettysburg, between July 1st and July 3rd, 1863, the Union Army, under the command of General George G. Meade, finally and decisively defeated the invading army led by the heretofore invincible Robert E. Lee. Gettysburg is the greatest battle ever fought in the Western hemisphere, with 51,000 casualties. (more…)

  SINCE 1837, it has been illegal to use explicitly Christian language in civil marriage ceremonies in Britain. But authorities appear to be getting more serious -- or rather, deranged --- about the law, probably in preparation for the sodomizing of marriage. As reported in The Telegraph, Gary and Louise Lidington, of London, were recently ordered to remove the words "in sickness and in health" from their pending vows because the words were too religious and did not comply "with the relevant legality process.” Sadly, the couple seems to have laughed the whole thing off. They would have been better off refusing to participate in the civil institution of marriage.

AT Tradition in Action, Atila Sinke Guimarães analyses a recent statement by Pope Francis regarding his reasons for rejecting the princely splendor of the papal apartments in favor of the relatively austere (and ugly) Domus Sanctae Marthae, where he now lives.

Guimarães writes: (more…)

MIKE BERMAN writes in this entry:

There is another reason, aside from Paula Deen’s groveling, why I cannot be sympathetic. She voted for Barack Hussein Obama. Twice. She endorsed Black Run America. She wanted that hope and change and she got it.

When I get asked if I’ve ever used the N-word, I reply, “Every day! I’m a big fan of rap music and I sing along.” I advise everyone to pick up some CDs and memorize some of this garbage. Think of it as insurance.

(more…)

  PAUL WESTON, founder of the Liberty GB Party in Britain, reflects on the recent decision by the British government to forbid Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller from entering the country. The British Parliament, he writes, is "terrified of Islam:" And this terror of Islam is because Islam uses terror. And quite clearly uses it very well.

DANIEL S. writes:

Fr. Francois Murad, a Franciscan friar, was recently kidnapped and beheaded by Syrian Muslim rebels after they accused him of cooperating with the Assad regime (a mere pretext to murder him). In the gruesome video posted online by the rebels, a crowd of Syrian villagers (including women and children) and Muslim militants stand around chanting “Allahu Akbar” (Allah is Most Great) as a Muslim fighter beheads Fr. Francois and two other men.  (more…)

  SHAWN CUSTIS, who is accused of savagely beating a mother during a burglary in New Jersey and was allegedly caught on camera throwing the woman down the stairs in front of her three-year-old daughter, was arrested Friday, a bit of news that pales in comparison to the outrage committed by celebrity chef Paula Deen. The Daily Mail has not permitted comments after its story about the attack in New Jersey.

SOMEDAY “African-American” will be a racist slur, a term so unacceptable that any public personality who recklessly uses it in private will be disgraced and threatened with the loss of his livelihood in the same way the syrupy and dissembling cooking personality Paula Deen has been disgraced and threatened for using the word “nigger” in private. Nigger, black, colored, negro — they’ve all become unacceptable because sooner or later they have all become associated with facts that do-good, holier-than-thou, know-nothing whites wish to deny. Those facts are the laziness, immorality and criminality of a significant number of blacks. “African American” will be eclipsed the more it is associated with reality. A new term will come into vogue, as “people of color” has come into use in recent years. It doesn’t matter. Whatever it is, it will be discarded and become a racist slur as long as reality is denied and honesty is taboo.

I don’t have too much sympathy for Deen, even though she appears to have lost much of her empire. She of all people could afford to be honest. Instead of pleading guilty, she could have said, “Look, black people call each other ‘nigger’ all the time and why shouldn’t they? It only means “black” and nothing more. Look it up in the dictionary. ‘Nigger’ comes from ‘niger,’ the Latin word for black. I know it does have negative associations and that’s why I have only used it a few times, such as the time when I was telling my husband about the black man who put a gun to my head in a bank, but how come blacks can say that word without losing their entire livelihoods, and I can’t? Besides, it’s only a word. Y’all heard of the expression, ‘Sticks and stones can break my bones but names can never hurt me?’ Grow up, America. I’ve never harmed a … an African American in my life.”

(more…)

HANNON writes:

With all the tribulations around us that your blog cannot avoid of late I thought I would share these recent photos from Forrest Park, St. Louis, Missouri. This magnificent statue of Saint Louis commemorates the Louisiana Purchase Exposition of 1904. Though he failed in his crusades, Louis IX was a figure of charity and honor in the late Medieval period. He was at once a soldier and humanitarian and led (in a former sense of the word) France during a brighter period of their history.

(more…)

DANIEL S. writes:

Counter-jihad activists and bloggers Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller have been banned from entry into Britain for their critical views on Islam. Spencer has provided a copy of the British Home Secretary’s letter outlining the reason for his being banned from speaking at an English Defense League rally, specifically this statement:  (more…)

HENRY McCULLOCH writes:

Sometimes a picture really is worth a few words. For those unfamiliar with U.S. Army insignia, these “soldiers” in their pixellated pyjamas are wearing the shoulder patch of the 1st Infantry Division, which served on the Western Front during World War I, in North Africa, Sicily and Northwest Europe (including Omaha Beach on D-Day and the Battle of the Bulge) during World War II, somehow sat out Korea on occupation duty in Germany, spent five years in-country during Vietnam, served in Desert Shield/Storm, and more recently in the Balkans, Iraq (including the invasion) and Afghanistan. (more…)

PETER writes:

It’s fascinating to witness our gnostic elite’s attempt to dissolve our civilization conceptually. When you observe people yelling and screaming for “gay” marriage, it generates a whole range of reactions and reflection about the nature of this issue.

The gnostic aspect is our ruling class’s intellectual error in misconceiving our civilization as a cosmic fact, a necessary part of the universe that must and will continue to exist.  Eric Voegelin masterfully elaborated on this in his Walgreen-sponsored lectures in 1952.  He used the phrase ‘propaganda for moral insanity’ in describing the symptoms of gnostic intoxication, getting all of reality’s defaults precisely backwards all the time, with elites who are confused by their dream conception as it blurs the structure of reality as it truly is. In this case, the misappropriation of one thing and its application to something wholly different.  Marriage cannot mean the same experience between heterosexuals and homosexuals.  The most obvious and economic point for a brief discourse is no children.  Only heterosexual unions can naturally transmit life. Marriage is the representative symbol of that unalterable reality, so it’s a natural target for gnosticism.

(more…)

HERE IS an opening excerpt from Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissenting opinion in the Supreme Court ruling on DOMA. Scalia is already the subject of a blizzard of scoldings and reprimands from the mainstream press, which supports the decision but cannot abide a critic. Scalia is Public Enemy No. 1. If you think this ruling will mitigate animosity toward those who oppose normalization of homosexuality, think again. It will only heighten this intolerance.

Justice Scalia writes:

This case is about power in several respects. It is about the power of our people to govern themselves, and the power of this Court to pronounce the law. Today’s opinion aggrandizes the latter, with the predictable consequence of diminishing the former. We have no power to decide this case. And even if we did, we have no power under the Constitution to invalidate this democratically adopted legislation. The Court’s errors on both points spring forth from the same diseased root: an exalted conception of the role of this institution in America.

(more…)

THE SUPREME COURT, by a ruling of 5-4, has struck down the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which prohibits the federal government from recognizing same-sex “marriages.” The decision, which was released this morning, can be found here. The justices also dismissed the suit over California’s Proposition 8, which banned same-sex “marriage,” clearing the way for legal “marriages” to take place there.

Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for the majority:

“The federal statute is invalid, for no legitimate purpose overcomes the purpose and effect to disparage and to injure those whom the State, by its marriage laws, sought to protect in personhood and dignity. By seeking to displace this protection and treating those persons as living in marriages less respected than others, the federal statute is in violation of the Fifth Amendment.”

Just to clarify this unwieldy conclusion, which could easily be used to defend the polygamist, here is the text of the Fifth Amendment:

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

The modern constitutional democracy, founded on equality and individual rights, is bankrupt. It has eaten up its very foundations. It is a rapacious, all-consuming beast that devours the common good and tears communities apart.

Under the ruling, not just marriage but parenthood will be redefined as the federal government grants equal status and parental rights to non-procreative unions.  “Mother” and “father” are discriminatory terms which do not recognize the “personhood” and “dignity” of homosexual couples. In other areas, the implications for taxes, Social Security, military benefits and other federal provisions are considerable as DOMA, signed into law in 1996, grants residents of states where homosexual unions are legal the right to all federal benefits granted to married couples. Nothing is to keep a friend from “marrying” another friend to grant him or her years of Social Security benefits. Harsh government measures will necessarily follow to force those who consider homosexuality immoral to recognize same-sex unions.

(more…)

  La Manif Pour Tous en France by FreeMyFrance AT Galliawatch, Tiberge writes: The recent events in France, so tumultuous and spontaneous, cannot be condensed in a six-minute video. However, despite the overly ambitious goal of this video, it recaptures (with helpful English titles) the energy, the enthusiasm of the demonstrators, the police actions, and the protests in the National Assembly by some politicians with a modicum of courage. These are just a few of the events that have filled the web pages, the newspapers, the blogs, the streets of Paris, and public squares in towns and villages throughout France for the past several months. Note: Commercials interrupt the video near the end. Tiberge also has many other interesting posts about events in France, including entries on the imprisonment of the protester Nicolas Bernard-Buss.