September 28, 2012
TORONTO GLOBE AND MAIL columnist Margaret Wente repeats approvingly Hanna Rosin’s thesis on “The End of Men,” which is that the reason men are lagging in the modern economy is that women are better at everything and men have become, economically speaking, an evolutionary maladaptation. Men are “cardboard” and women, because of their great adaptability, are “plastic.” She writes: Read More »
September 28, 2012
IT is rare that I have positive news to relay. Today is an exception. Thanks to the trendy New York City baker Jim Lahey, I have found an outstanding recipe for homemade pizza crust.
This dough is exceptional. Like all low-yeast breads, it tastes more fully of wheat and has the light, bubbly texture that is commonly associated with “artisan” breads. It is very easy to make as it involves no kneading. It does need to rise for 18 hours, however, so you make it the day before.
The recipe is from Lahey’s book, My Pizza, which I borrowed from my local library, and is available at the Bon Appetit website here. Lahey has his own website with a few recipes for the book’s pizza toppings, such as the Boscaiola pie (above), which comes with pork sausage, mushrooms, tomato sauce and red onions. His topping combinations are very good. He has an interesting way of broiling pizzas to give them a charred, wood-fired taste. One can also just cook the pies in a very hot oven.
By the way, Lahey, who started the Sullivan Street Bakery in New York, has observations about the industrialization of pizza that will be familiar to any reader of this site. This is an issue that unites right and left. In the introduction to his pizza book, Lahey writes: Read More »
September 27, 2012
KATHLENE M. writes:
I’m forwarding this interesting New York Post article by Kyle Smith in case you haven’t seen it. It’s a biting critique of Hanna Rosin’s book The End of Men and the Rise of Women. The article is titled “Junk Male: Women don’t need guys anymore — this is progress?” I’m so glad to see that people are starting to question feminism’s nightmare utopia of “freedom” for women.
The opening paragraph grabbed my attention immediately:
So, women have gained the right to work soul-crushing, corporation-drone, 80-hour weeks, the right to bear and raise children without male interference, the right to live alone until the stress of having a career while retaining most of their family responsibilities gradually squeezes the life out of them.
September 27, 2012
Victoria and Albert Museum, London/Art Resource; A scene from Tristram Shandy (‘Uncle Toby and the Widow Wadman’); painting by Charles Robert Leslie, 1831
September 27, 2012
COL. RON CREWS, a retired Army chaplain, writes in the Washington Times about the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”
The first anniversary of the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” Sept. 20, has come and gone. Now, there is mounting evidence that proves our warnings were not idle chatter. The threat to freedom posed by this radical sexual experiment on our military is real: It is grave and it is growing.
Activists inside and outside our government who pushed the repeal have deployed a smoke screen around the fact that once the military was forced to exalt homosexuality in the ranks, the all-too-foreseen consequence reared its ugly head. Read More »
September 27, 2012
AT The Orthosphere, Kristor has two thoughtful and interesting posts, here and here, on the natural foundations of patriarchy. He argues that all societies are irrevocably patriarchal, including the feminist society:
Feminism is a movement among men, to indulge women with more authority in the determination of public life. Men allowed feminism; they may disallow it whenever they see fit. Who would stop them, other than men? So even feminism is an operation of patriarchy. This alone does not make feminism either wrong or right. It is, rather, a mere fact about the conditions under which alone feminism can exist. You can’t pass a law to make men less powerful in society that will make them actually less powerful than in fact they are, any more than you can make π = 3 by fiat. At most, such legislation can get men to pretend that the confabulations they propose are veridical. Read More »
September 26, 2012
THERE HAS been relatively little coverage in the U.S. of the Australian parliament’s overwhelming rejection last week of a bill legalizing same-sex unions. The New York Times, as far as I can tell, did not even run the story. The news conflicts with the constantly-touted notion that homosexual “marriage” is inevitable everywhere in the Western world.
September 25, 2012
LEILA writes:
I love your blog. It’s been like an anchor for me in this tempestuous, disorderly world.
I have a question for you about marriage. The subject is of a very serious nature.
I was married for almost seven years, and the relationship was difficult from the beginning. My ex-husband was a serial adulterer. I loved him with all my heart and did everything I could to overcome this problem. But after a certain point it became too crushing a weight to bear. There were other problems as well. He lied a lot and was extremely dismissive of me. He maintained other relationships with other women for years. I spiraled into a deep depression, and became angry and fearful, which only made things worse. Read More »
September 24, 2012
A PROPOSED French law that would legalize same-sex “marriage” would also ban the words “mother” and “father” from all government documents, the Telegraph reports. Let’s repeat that. In a major European country, it may soon be illegal to refer to “mother” and “father” in official documents.
The language change is an inevitable move for countries that approve homosexual unions. Same-sex “marriage” and same-sex “parenthood” change the entire conceptual framework of the family. “Mother” and “father” refer to the irrevocable biological origins of every human being and thus exclude homosexuals, just as nature excludes homosexuals from procreation. Once these words are officially banned, they will almost certainly become tainted in everyday usage.
President Francois Hollande has vowed to approve the redefinition of marriage. The law comes before his cabinet on Oct. 31.
September 24, 2012
MARIAN HORVAT has an interesting review at Tradition in Action of The Red Queen, an historical novel by Philippa Gregory about Lady Margaret Beaufort, the mother of King Henry VII. Ms. Gregory is a feminist revisionist. She “does not like the devout Lady Margaret Beaufort, and so she depicts her as a bitter, scheming and pharisaical woman who pretends to follow the “will of God” – so long as it corresponds to her own.” Gregory accuses Lady Beaufort of the murders of the famous sons of Edward IV, who disappeared while imprisoned in the Tower of London, an accusation which has no historical foundation.
September 24, 2012
IN YET another long comment about, yes, UFOs, Alan provides a link to a thoughtful 1975 essay by the Caltech scientist Bruce Murray. Murray writes:
The existence of UFO’s gets to be a debate of almost theological proportions, involving heresy and faith, and that is not very scientific. The reason is that when one is presented with reports of phenomena that do not make sense, some people cannot stand the uncertainty. It is just like the situation in ordinary social affairs, where there is a tendency to want to have an answer right now, right or wrong, and if the only choices are between, “It’s nothing,” or, “It’s the most bizarre thing in the world,” you choose one of those two answers. Well, the answer really is that you probably do not have the right answer yet, and so you should not make a choice. Read More »
September 23, 2012
DIANA M. writes:
The other day, I was in the bookstore Barnes & Noble. I sat down for a bit of a rest. Next to me, someone had discarded a bunch of fashion/lifestyle magazines. I idly looked at the covers. They were:
LUCKY: Christina Aguilera, a dyed blonde half-Ecuadorian who wisely opts to be identified as “Hispanic”
ALLURE: Sofia Vergara – Hispanic (“32 F and Proud”)
TIME OUT: Zoe Saldana – Afro-Hispanic (identified on the cover as “Actor” Zoe Saldana)
INSTYLE: Jennifer Lopez (Who needs no description)
Scanning these covers, I heard Spanish. I was seated near the “Ficcion” section, where they had stationed a Spanish-speaking clerk, who was catering to Spanish-speaking customers. Read More »
September 22, 2012
The new $125 million Islamic art wing at the Louvre
Protests against "Innocence of Muslims" in Pakistan
September 22, 2012
THE discussion of obituaries in an age of divorce and egregious narcissism continues. It’s a fascinating subject. I’ve always thought kindergarten teachers and police detectives know more about basic human nature than most people. Now, I believe those who put together obituaries in the local newspapers do too. In the latest entry, Alexandra, a former obituary journalist, tells of the confusion that resulted when a deceased man’s two families could not agree on a single obituary.
Thus, the next day featured two obituaries of the same man, one by his second wife and her children, one by his first wife and her children. Their accounts were radically different. Each left out the other spouse and children. Who knows which came closer to the truth of the gentleman’s beliefs and values? I was appalled by the spectacle, and it reminded me that the carnage of divorce doesn’t heal itself. (The second marriage had lasted for 25 years.) The consequences go on and on, without end.
September 21, 2012
THE average life span of American white women without college degrees has fallen by a stunning four years in just two decades, according to researchers. (The life expectancy for blacks and Hispanics at the same level rose although blacks continue to have a shorter life span.) For those without a high school degree, it has fallen by five years.
According to The New York Times,
The five-year decline for white women rivals the catastrophic seven-year drop for Russian men in the years after the collapse of the Soviet Union, said Michael Marmot, director of the Institute of Health Equity in London.
Could it be that white women on the bottom rungs exist in a moral and physical wasteland? Just asking.
September 21, 2012
CHICK-fil-A has refuted claims by Chicago politicians that its charitable foundation will stop giving donations to organizations that oppose same-sex “marriage.” However, the organization also made it emphatically clear that it takes no position as an institution against same-sex “marriage.”
“Our intent is not to support political or social agendas,” a company statement released yesterday said.
So much for the company’s bold Christian principles.
