“THERE is nothing so absurd,’ quipped the ancient Roman philosopher-statesman Cicero, ‘that it can’t be said by a philosopher.’ Unfortunately, philosophers’ absurdities aren’t limited to classroom sophistry and eccentric speculations. They make their way into print and are thereby released upon the public. They can be, and have been, as dangerous and harmful as deadly diseases. And as with deadly diseases, people can pick up deadly ideas without even noticing. These ideas float, largely undetected, in the intellectual air we breathe.

“If we take a good, hard, sober look at the awful effects of such deadly ideas we can come to only one conclusion: there are books that really have screwed up the world, books that we would have been better off without.

“This should not come as a shock, except to those who don’t believe that ideas have consequences. Thomas Carlyle, the eminent Scottish essayist and sometime philosopher, was once scolded at a dinner party for endlessly chattering about books: ‘Ideas, Mr. Carlyle, ideas, nothing but ideas!’ To which he replied, ‘There once was a man called Rousseau who wrote a book containing nothing but ideas. The second edition was bound in the skins of those who laughed at the first.’ Carlyle was right. Jean-Jacques Rousseau wrote a book that inspired the ruthlessness of the French Revolution (and even more destructive things after that).

‘Common sense and a little logic tell us that if ideas have consequences, then it follows that bad ideas have bad consequences. And even more obvious, if bad ideas are written down in books, they are far more durable, infecting generation after generation and increasing the world’s wretchedness.’

— Benjamin Wiker, Ten Books that Screwed Up the World, and Five Others that Didn’t Help

(more…)

"GOD seems to have set women apart to pay the debt of sin. Men saints have a wider sphere of action and one that attracts attention. They travel all over the world, found or reform Religious Orders, convert the heathen, exercise their ministry in the pulpit by their eloquence. Woman has a more passive role to fulfill: she has not the sacerdotal character and may pass her life in silent suffering on a bed of sickness. The temperament of a woman is more affectionate and devoted, as well as less selfish than a man's. She is likewise more impressionable and susceptible of emotion. Our Lord Himself met with a readier welcome from women; they excel in little and refined attentions, little acts of thoughtful charity such indeed as a man, unless he is a St. Francis of Assisi, overlooks." --- Joris-Karl Huysmans (1848-1907)  

"EVERYTHING reminds us of the cross. We ourselves are made in the form of a cross. Balm and sweetness exhale from the cross. The unction, which overflows from the cross, inundates our souls, in proportion as we unite ourselves with it, holding it tightly against our hearts. The cross contains more wisdom than any book; all who do not know this book are ignorant, however many other books they may have studied. Those only are truly wise who love and consult this book, who study it deeply. Bitter as this book is, they are never happier than when they can immerse themselves in its bitterness. The more they frequent this school, the more they desire to remain there, never do their studies weary them." --- St. John Vianney  

"Without the burden of afflictions it is impossible to reach the height of grace. The gift of grace increases as the struggle increases." ---- St. Rose of Lima  

"WHAT if a man is poor? Even so he is rich. Look at His riches with eyes of faith only. For you look only at an empty purse; not at a conscience filled with God. Outwardly he has nothing, but within he has charity. How much can one give from charity and not exhaust it!" -- St. Augustine  

STAGE a fake war in Gaza. Garner billions in U.S. aid. Cause protests and political division in the West. Send millions of Muslim refugees from "war-torn" Palestine to Europe. Conquer your greatest enemy. Redevelop Gaza into a resort area. Checkmate! According to Fakenukes Phil, that's the current agenda in the Middle East and it's succeeding. I can't endorse all Phil's theories, but this one sounds right.  

"DIFFERENCE of race or condition or sex is indeed taken away by the unity of faith, but it remains embedded in our mortal interactions, and in the journey of this life the apostles teach that it is to be respected, and they even proposed living in accord with the racial differences between Jews and Greeks as a wholesome rule." [bold added] --- St. Augustine, Epistle to the Galatians (3:28-29)  

"MANY examples can be cited which show that absolutely nothing would remain intact in human society if we should determine to believe only what we can grasp by perception." --- St. Augustine, The Advantage of Believing  

IN 1967, Carleton Putnam, businessman, Princeton graduate and author, wrote:

Let a man be told incessantly that everything he and his forefathers had achieved was largely a matter of chance; that the poverty and backward condition of other individuals and races was also largely a question of luck — in fact perhaps even the fault of himself and his forefathers; that his standards of morals, fiscal responsibility and personal integrity were no better than anyone else’s; that his civilization was mostly happenstance and really nothing much to be proud of; that since all humanity were innately equal, all actual differences must be due to the other man’s misfortune and his own four-leaf clovers — let a man hear these things often enough and his values were bound to change. (more…)

 O all ye things that spring up in the earth, bless the Lord: praise and exalt him above all for ever.   O ye fountains, bless the Lord: praise and exalt him above all for ever.   O ye seas and rivers, bless the Lord: praise and exalt him above all for ever.  O ye whales, and all that move in the waters, bless the Lord: praise and exalt him above all for ever.  O all ye fowls of the air, bless the Lord: praise and exalt him above all for ever. O all ye beasts and cattle, bless the Lord: praise and exalt him above all for ever.  O ye sons of men, bless the Lord, praise and exalt him above all for ever.  O let Israel bless the Lord: let them praise and exalt him above all for ever.   O ye priests of the Lord, bless the Lord: praise and exalt him above all for ever.  O ye servants of the Lord, bless the Lord: praise and exalt him above all for ever. [Daniel 3:76-85]  

BLOOD is thicker than water. The apple doesn't fall far from the tree. A leopard cannot change its spots. Birds of a feather flock together. Bloom where you are planted. You aren't required to set yourself on fire to keep others warm. The greatest kindness will not bind the ungrateful. The same law for both the lion and ox is oppression. Good fences make good neighbors. Like Father, like son. An ounce of blood is worth more than a pound of friendship. [With thanks to Who Is My Neighbor?: An Anthology of Natural Relations, by Thomas Achord and Darrel Dow]  

"PEOPLE tend to be quite fickle. They love us and leave us. They shift from one position to another like a kite in the wind. Let them do as they will. Just be sure that you see only God in them. It is He that tests and blesses us, using them as we have need." --- François Fénelon, P.S.S.  

[T]he privileges of the learned become more obnoxious to egalitarian sentiment as they become fewer and smaller; and since the learned are not exempt from egalitarian fever, but on the contrary are often its most active fomenters, those privileges become more obnoxious even to the learned themselves.

— Alexis de Tocqueville

ALAN writes:

The men who designed and built big-city American libraries knew that quiet is a necessary condition for contemplation. The purpose of quiet in traditional libraries was to differentiate them from other buildings and to provide a place where the interior voice and thought were respected and encouraged.

Modern libraries, by contrast, are delighted to pulverize that distinction by pandering to the lowest common denominator and attempting to make libraries just like other places that aren’t libraries. If you walk into a library today and think you are walking into a library, you are ten percent right. But what stands before you is a package-deal: ten percent library, 90 percent not-library.  That other 90 percent consists of:

–A place to converse in person or by phone
–A movie and music rental store
–A place to loiter
–A refuge for the down and out to get out of the cold or heat
–A playroom for children
–A voter registration office
–A passport agency
–An entertainment center where you can watch cartoons and porn
–A center for political advocacy and activism (invariably Leftist, Feminist, and Communist).

I have no objection to most of those activities. But they should be kept in separate buildings. Call it a Pseudo-Library, but don’t call it a library. A library is books and periodicals, plus the reading, writing, contemplation, or research that quiet makes possible. Grafting those other nine functions on to a traditional library does not improve a library; it degrades it.

“Children should have places to go when they want quiet and freedom from social stimulation. Public libraries have provided such a place, although for a rather specialized clientele.  Now even that is changing as libraries become media centers that encourage bustle and social interaction.  What has happened to the librarians who used to hiss “Shush!”?  Perhaps we could find reemployment for them in new kinds of institutions where quiet prevailed but where there was no particular thing that children were supposed to do—where they could read or draw or sew or dream or engage in tête-à-têtes provided they did not rise above a murmur.  It would also be nice if such places could provide booths for privacy……”

Carl Bereiter wrote those words 53 years ago. [Must We Educate?, Prentice-Hall, 1973, pp. 105-6] (more…)

(more…)

IN A Complete Catechism of the Catholic Religion (1912) by Fr. Joseph Deharbe, this interesting, brief description of lust is included and I think it explains a lot of things happening around us -- except today we don't have dueling. How do we sin by Lust? By indulging in immodest or impure thoughts, desires, words, or actions. The ordinary effects of lust, or impurity, are: Aversion to prayer and to all that is good; excessive fondness for amusement and dissipation; neglect of the duties of our state of life; great desire of attracting notice; insensibility and cruelty; all sorts of shameless excesses and of unnatural crimes; seduction of innocence; false promises and oaths; theft, ruin of health and of domestic happiness; enmity, duels, suicide or self-murder; and likewise atheism, sacrilege, worship of the devil, madness, and despair. (See the Sixth Commandment of God.) There's nothing better than a pithy, well-worded description of one of the capital sins -- sins which lead to other sins. It helps us know ourselves better. And life isn't worth living without self-knowledge. Lust is a form of slavery. "The whole history of mankind testifies to our weakness in this matter," wrote W.F. Strojie. "Dalliance, urged on by pride and vanity, leads any into sexual slavery... [T]he devil lays his snares in attractive persons; or in any one of hundreds of worldly attractions, not in themselves, at least not at first, bad." The surest way to…

MORE wisdom from the late Dolores Rose Morris:

Any time there have been attacks on the Church of the Old Testament or that of the New Testament, these rebellions and revolutions have been instigated from within by its very own leaders. Whenever this did occur, no one was willing to admit it, to realize it or to recognize it, because they themselves had become infected with the dreadful disease of spiritual blindness which prevented them from seeing what had happened and what would further happen from that point. They resisted any one who stood up to remind them of the Truth and point out their error. They even went as far as to murder the prophets God sent to them to remind them of their errors and to call them back to the Truth of the unchanging Law of God. (more…)

IT’S SAD more young people can’t see that the popularizing of hostility against “boomers” — i.e., their parents’ generation — is a classic, Marxist, divide-and-conquer tactic that has been used before in history and is being deliberately promoted by powerful agents of disorder who want total control over all generations.

It’s similar to the tactics of feminism, creating division between men and women for the sake of those at the top. Distract people from the real source of their pain. Whenever I go to our local mall, I see women and men in their 80’s working as sales clerks. ‘Ok, boomer! You’re the oppressor!”

The promotion of intergenerational warfare is a longstanding strategy of subversion that was successful in the Soviet Union and Communist China.

The term “boomers” has become a derisive slur against the old, exaggerating their failings to the point of obsession and expressing contempt for their sacrifices. It’s not that “boomers” don’t deserve criticism, it’s that the artificial intensification of it reeks of psychological warfare. A culture as materialistic as ours, and as enslaved by a system of debt-based usury that hurts young and old alike, is also naturally going to have little room or time for the old. So demonizing them fits. “Ok, boomer!”

(more…)