CAROLYN HAX, the Washington Post advice columnist, is an incarnation of modern non-judgmentalism, which decrees that when someone does something utterly outrageous in his personal life, others must accept it and say, “Well, who are we to judge?” A woman writes to Hax and tells her that her husband has left her and their children for a man and is now posting indecent ads online with his boyfriend: (more…)
NOW THAT charges have been dropped against Dominique Strauss-Kahn on the basis of the character of his accuser, it is inconceivable that the case be closed. Nafissatou Diallo should be prosecuted for perjury and obstructing justice.
SEE the coverage of World Youth Day in Madrid at Tradition in Action.
THE PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER features this story today of a woman who joined the Marines to follow in the footsteps of her deceased boyfriend, who was killed in the Marines. One can’t help but feel for this woman’s grief and loneliness, but warriors are not made in this way. (more…)
SUSAN writes:
I’ve enjoyed going through your archives, and in some ways I agree with you. I would like to ask about one of the issues you frequently address.
A couple of notes about my situation: I’m married, and my husband is a man by any standard. He’s not a firefighter, police officer, or in the military – in fact, he works as a mid-level paper-shuffling office drone (and I’m not criticizing him, as he’d be the first to agree with me). (more…)
JOEL BAKAN, a Canadian law professor, writes in The New York Times,
WHEN I sit with my two teenagers, and they are a million miles away, absorbed by the titillating roil of online social life, the addictive pull of video games and virtual worlds, as they stare endlessly at video clips and digital pictures of themselves and their friends, it feels like something is wrong. (more…)
WHO WILL this child be someday? His parents – a black woman and an Asian man – conceived him in a contractual arrangement. His mother lives with a white woman. They have all three fulfilled their desire for parenthood, without viewing the child as a whole, as a social being.
I always wonder what the people who work in the clinics that facilitate these kinds of families are like. I can’t imagine it. Life must seem so cheap to them. (more…)
CONTINUING THE discussion of subsidized infant formula and the culture of breastfeeding (see previous entries here, here, and here), Kimberly writes:
When I was a brand new housewife with my first baby boy, two old men in a coffee shop asked me if I planned on going back to work sooner or later. My response was sincere and unplanned. “No, I would rather work for love than for money any day!” I said, with a big grin. The old men smiled big, amused, and what looked like almost grateful smiles. (more…)
THIS STORY OF foreign students protesting their wages at a chocolate plant in Pennsylvania is truly remarkable. The students came to this country on State Department work-travel visas, known as J-1 visas, which are commonly used to provide businesses with a pool of cheap foreign labor, especially in the summer. The students’ complaints, judging from the news accounts, are two-fold. One, they wanted to make more money for less labor. (They are paid $8.35 an hour.) Two, they wanted to have a good time.
One of the students came right out and said that she was expecting Charle’s Chocolate Factory, not a real manufacturing plant. What an outrage. No Oompa-Loompas or Willy Wonka. No Veruca Salt or Mike Teavee. According to the New York Times,
When she was offered a contract for a job at a plant with Hershey’s chocolates, she said, she was excited. “We have all seen Charlie’s chocolate factory,” she said. “We thought, ‘This is good.’ ”
The State Department grants the students visas through an agency called the Council for Educational Travel. The Council works with employers around America to find foreign students jobs, a service unavailable to Americans. There are no agencies rounding up paying jobs and summer housing for any American college students who are without employment and would like to work. (more…)
WRITING IN The Sidney Telegraph, Columnist Miranda Devine last week discussed the publicity surrounding Finance Minister Penny Wong’s lesbian partner, who is expecting a baby. Devine spoke in fairly mild terms, condemning a fatherless society and same-sex marriage. She wasn’t in the least critical of Wong herself. (more…)
MICHAEL S. writes:
I find the comments of the Marriage Project with regards to the new marriage norm very interesting. Over the pass several months I have discussed marriage with my girlfriend. In the process I expressed a desire to marry and start having children. In my mind, the next step after marriage is starting a family. (more…)
SEBASTIAN C. writes:
My disagreement with you and Dalrymple is so extreme, I’m going to try to write a piece for Zero Hedge blasting him for making such a stupid, unfair, morally relativistic argument. The fact that the windbag was trying to criticize moral relativism makes it even worse. Comparing the London looters to the bankers who now hold the whole Western world hostage and threaten a war of holocaust proportions to match the ones they manufactured in the previous century, who refer to the cradles of our civilization as “Piigs,” who rape and enslave entire nations, defames the rioters’ good name. (more…)
DIANA writes:
Two observations came to me as a read this article about the horrific child-murder involving physician Louis Chen which you discussed last week:
1. Journalists now accept as normal the biologically impossible: that two males can “have a child.” (Up there with “gender reassignment” and other forms of science fiction we have
to accept as fact.)
2. More important, this is a stew of sheer perversity!
COMMENTERS in the British press in the past week have drawn disturbing parallels between looters in the recent riots and the bankers involved in the 2008 financial crisis, as well as members of parliament accused in the expenses scandal. Theodore Dalrymple at City Journal examines the warped comparison between looters and the bankers. He writes: (more…)
IN THEIR 2010 report, Brad Wilcox and Elizabeth Marquardt of the National Marriage Project make an excellent case for why marriage has declined among the less educated. When marriage is redefined to mean, first and foremost, intimacy between adults, rather than an institution for the rearing of children, it is far less attainable for ordinary people. I would take it one step further and say when marriage is redefined to mean “soul mate” intimacy and radical equality, it is far less attainable.
They wrote: (more…)
NEWS ORGANIZATIONS are heavily reporting the latest findings by the National Marriage Project, which show once again the continued decline of marital relationships among the lower middle class, with working-class whites increasingly resembling inner-city blacks in their family structure.
Cohabitation has grown fourteen-fold among parents since the 1970s. A quarter of American women with multiple children have children with more than one man. Out-of-wedlock births are uncommon among college-educated women. (The Marriage Project does not mention here that this is partly due to the greater acceptance of abortion among the educated.) Cohabitation is common among the highly educated but usually occurs before marriage.
With the growth in cohabitation, the divorce rate has decreased by four percentage points among couples in the first ten years of marriage. Cohabiting couples are more than twice as likely to break up before their first child is twelve and children who live with cohabiting adults have worse outcomes and a much higher incidence of behavior problems. (more…)