Monstrous Hypocrisy in the Claim of Cruelty towards Homosexuals
PATRICK HOLDEN writes:
One aspect of the Michele Bachman controversy over gay reparative therapy struck me as odd. Opponents of gay reparative therapy criticize it as cruel and inhumane. My understanding is that the therapy consists of reading the Bible, praying and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). In addition, celibacy was recommended as an alternative to engaging in homosexual behavior. I see nothing wrong with a competent adult deciding to attempt to live a life of celibacy based on the very traditional belief that homosexuality is wrong. I also don’t see anything wrong with obtaining psychological services in furtherance of this goal.
Contrast this with the reaction to sex reassignment surgery, which is never condemned in leftist circles as cruel or inhumane. (more…)
![bigstockphoto_Flowers_2617686[1] bigstockphoto_Flowers_2617686[1]](https://thinkinghousewife.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/bigstockphoto_Flowers_26176861-105x150.jpg)

