THIS ARTICLE in today’s New York Times about nannies in Brazil and their ability to claim higher and higher salaries is written in the seemingly non-judgmental style of most articles about the abandonment of home and children by modern mothers. In truth, the article is highly approving of the trend. The writer Alexei Barrionuevo says the phenomenon has only one serious drawback – it’s hard for some women to instantly find a nanny.
Wealthy women have hired servants for many centuries. There is nothing wrong with that. But it is deeply wrong when a culture’s brightest and wealthiest women leave their homes en masse for jobs. It is immoral. Why?
1. This phenomenon creates more job competition, lessening the ability of men to support their families and forcing other women, including many middle class women, to work.
2. It creates unrealistic standards for the middle class and poor, standards which encourage the societal abandonment of child-rearing and lead to everyday domestic chaos for non-wealthy families.
3. It deprives families and communities of the moral, spiritual and intellectual vigilance of women whose lives are not directed to commercial activity.
4. It creates a society that worships technocratic competence and disparages love. It harms marriage and family bonds.
Many women who leave their homes every day for high-powered jobs love their children and do remarkable things for them. But a society of women who leave their families is soulless and corrupt. (more…)