A MIDDLE-AGED MAN I know was laid off almost two years ago. He could not find a new job in the private sector. After a long and desperate search, he finally took a position as a high school math teacher in a major American city. He now teaches 100 or so students a day and sadly returns to school this week, desperately depressed.

“Oh, I hate it,” he said recently. He has an engineering degree and is in his early fifties, with two children to put through college.

“Teaching” is far too strong a word for what my friend does and it is no wonder that he hates it. He is both prison warden and inmate, authority figure and whipping boy. He has no recourse against disruptive students and there are always three or four very disruptive students in his classes, thus very little is accomplished in the course of the day. The administration takes virtually no disciplinary action. If there is a serious problem, teachers are told to phone the police. Imagine being a teacher and having no recourse in the event of serious aggression but to call 911?

My friend is not permitted to consider behavior when grading. Suspensions and expulsions are rare, if not non-existent. Wherein lies this breakdown of authority? Why isn’t a teacher permitted to teach? Read More »

DALE F. writes:

Here’s a good article by Roger Scruton at the American Spectator on opera authentically done as the last refuge of the bourgeoisie.

I’m not as sold as he is on the quality of the Metropolitan Opera, but certainly compared to the sort of trashy European productions he singles out, the Met is superior. I think our own Music Academy of the West’s recent production of Don Giovanni was, in Scruton’s terms, nearly flawless. (Though to be clear about my own tenuous links to the bourgeoisie, at three hours, I found it a little long.) Read More »

THE DISCUSSION on what wives and mothers should call themselves continues here. In response to a reader’s comment that housewives should respond with defiant witticisms to any challenge, I write: 

[T]he hesitation for a woman to call herself a housewife does not purely stem from uncertainty or lack of confidence, it also comes from deference to other mothers. A housewife often feels she must hide what she has in the same way a rich person may feel the need to downplay his wealth. The housewife possesses great riches in the time she has to act upon her love for her children and husband and even though she may have traded material comfort and live in reduced circumstances in order to attain this gold, she may not want to show off her enormous wealth. Therefore she hedges when asked to describe who she is.

All this is inevitable in a society that does not explictly affirm the role of full-time mother and wife. A society that does not explicitly affirm this role becomes one that explicitly affirms the opposite: the absentee mother and wife. The idea of balancing social approval is a myth; such balance is impossible to achieve because these are mutually exclusive ideals. Society cannot approve contradictory standards.  Read More »

JESSE POWELL writes:

Shocking news has hit the men’s rights community. Men’s News Daily, the biggest men’s rights site on the Internet, is going to shut down within a month. The announcement was made on August 28, 2010, in a letter from Mike LaSalle to his readers.  Though Paul Elam has acted as the manager of MND for the past year, Mike LaSalle is the person who actually owns the Men’s News Daily website and he is the person who has decided to shut the website down. 

Men’s News Daily got started shortly after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, a little less than nine years ago. Read More »

A READER writes:

A Toronto Star article on “late-blooming lesbians” contains all the latest mumbo jumbo on the theory of female sexual fluidity. It is a slickly written piece. Beyond the obvious message it intends to deliver, I noticed the events the author quoted as examples of what led the women to become lesbians. Interesting. This “sexual fluidity” thing is just over the top, as far as I am concerned. We have the pop song, “I Kissed a Girl and I liked it” and now this for the older ladies. I first heard the term “sexual fluidity” on a men’s rights site and at the time I dismissed it as absurd. I guess I was wrong. I refuse to believe women are innately fluid, but how many will? Read More »

GIVEN that women can be violent and often instigate domestic violence, why does society stigmatize male domestic violence more, even at the risk of punishing men wrongly? One answer can be found in the unspoken presumption of male authority. As Jesse Powell writes in this long discussion on domestic violence:

Another difference between female violence towards men in romantic relationships and male violence towards women is that there is a presumption of legitimate male authority, that male authority should be upheld and promoted, and male domestic violence against women undermines this legitimacy. This is another special harm that male domestic violence creates that female domestic violence does not. Female domestic violence does not undermine female authority, because there is no legitimacy for female authority in the first place. The societal principle that men should have authority in their relationships is undermined by male domestic violence because male authority is real.  Read More »

Henry James

THOMAS F. BERTONNEAU writes, in response to the latest post on Basil Ransom, the hero of Henry James’s novel The Bostonians and an inspiring  prototype of a man at odds with modern liberalism:

When Basil Ransom first catches sight of Verena at a séance, she is sixteen years old.  She is moreover on display as a mesmeric subject who can channel messages from the beyond; her parents in a kind of mystic road show are marketing her for a Chautauqua audience of suffragettes, blue-nose liberals, and quasi-Christians of vaguely socialist inclination.  All of these people speak endlessly of ideals and Verena – as one would expect from an adolescent who has known no other milieu – speaks a vocabulary of debased Transcendentalism too.  But she is really only mimicking a style of speech; the words have no profound content for her although they imply something about her probable future. Read More »

PRAYER is the expression of desire; its value comes from our inward aspirations, from their tenor and their strength. Take away desire, the prayer ceases; alter it, the prayer changes; increase or diminish its intensity, the prayer soars upward or has no wings. Inversely, take away the expression while leaving the desire, and the prayer in many ways remains intact. Has a child who says nothing but looks longingly at a toy in a shop window, and then at his smiling mother not formulated the most moving prayer? And even if he had not seen the toy, is not the desire for play, innate in the child as is the thirst for movement, in the eyes of his parents a standing prayer which they grant?

We ought always to pray is the same as saying: we must always desire eternal things, the temporal things which serve the eternal, our daily bread of every kind and for every need, life in all its fulness earthly and heavenly.

                              — A.D. Sertillanges, The Intellectual Life

Read More »

ONE THING that has not been mentioned in the discussion on domestic violence is that violent women are celebrated on television and in movies as never before.

Robin writes:

While I am not sure either that this is what women actually desire to watch, I will say that women do watch such programs often because they are so terribly confused as to the actual definition of womanhood in society today. Often, the women where I live behave exactly like men in almost every way in their day-to-day lives: women operating heavy lawn equipment, women doing difficult physical labor, women working in traditionally masculine jobs in factories and women running the family finances and almost completely orchestrating the lives of their husbands and boyfriends, expecting their men to act as their “wives” when they arrive home from work.  Read More »

SIMONE writes:

Judging by the title of your blog, it is fairly safe to assume that you refer to yourself as a ‘housewife.’ I’m sure it hasn’t escaped your attention that nowadays many married women who stay at home to raise their children and support their husbands prefer to be known as‘homemakers’ or a ‘stay-at-home-moms.’ If pressed on the issue, these women would probably argue that ‘housewife’ is an old-fashioned term which is not inclusive of single mothers and unmarried cohabitants who are not employed outside the home.  Read More »

JEAN-PAUL de Montréal écrit:

DAVID LEE MUNDY writes:

Is individual suffering alone a sufficient basis for legislative action? The notion that it is lies behind many questionable reforms and shows an increasingly common error in logic. In actuality, there are always competing policy interests. The tree is pitted against the forest.  

Take domestic abuse. Laws curbing violence or protecting women must be weighed against other policy goals like protecting marriage and protecting men from false allegations of domestic violence. To a man, a false accusation of domestic abuse is comparable to domestic abuse. Read More »

THE AUTHOR Joyce Maynard, divorced and 55, has satisfied a serious case of maternal lust by adopting two children from Ethiopia. Joining the significant number of Western parents who pursue global utopianism in their own homes, Maynard spent $20,000 to adopt the two girls, taking them far from their own county to bring them to California. Several months into the experience, she has written about it for More magazine, explaining how this new home filled with Western comforts and the love of strangers is better than the modest orphanage these girls left behind.

“I didn’t do this to be noble,” Maynard writes. “I was a mother in need of some children.” Well, at least she is honest. (A father is irrelevant; he doesn’t even come up as a necessity in any way.) Nevertheless, one suspects, given the amount of time she spends detailing the life she has created for her adopted daughters in More (a magazine devoted to more of everything), that she does indeed see her actions as noble. Read More »

AMY CHOZICK in today’s Wall Street Journal writes about the new television show “Nikita:”

The show reflects new thinking among television network executives: Their core audience—female viewers—want to see a woman take down the enemy, preferably with a little bloodshed along the way. The approach overturns years of belief that violent shows turn off women who prefer to watch earnest nurses, headstrong housewives or quirky career women.

I am not convinced that this is what viewers want, but this and the other shows mentioned by Chozick do reflect the cultural celebration of aggression in females. And, it is clear viewers will chow down on the junk that is fed to them.                                   Read More »

THE WORLD is full of Verena Tarrants. Verena, remember, is the heroine of Henry James’s 1885 novel The Bostonians. She is the naive girl enamored of feminism. It is her life and religion, but the main reason she has fallen under its sway is the power and will of one particular feminist, the Boston aristocrat Olive Chancellor. Olive is symbolic of the many demagogues, the Gloria Steinems and Simone de Beauvoirs, the Katie Courics, Oprah Winfreys, and Sarah Palins, who have led far more submissive women into the feminist trenches.

James’s hero, Basil Ransom, succeeds in converting a feminist. He does so in a way very similar to that described by Brandon B. and Heady G. in this entry. Read More »

BRANDON B. writes:

I have a few thoughts on your recent post  on “Romancing a Feminist.” 

I’ve found that while most young women may conform to the liberal order, many of them have latent traditional impulses that need to be drawn out. More on how to do this in a moment. As has been mentioned by others,  many women are simply liberal for the most superficial reasons i.e., pure and unadulterated conformity to society and their peer group. This is understandable. It’s very feminine to be this reponsive.  Read More »

WAL-MART FACES a class-action suit by a million female employees who say they are the victims of sex discrimination. This may become the largest employment discrimination suit in U.S. history. The case is fueled by two stunningly wrongheaded assumptions: that government should have any say in compensation and promotion and that women are the same as men.

If the case proceeds, it will be difficult, if not impossible, for a company as large as Wal-Mart to disprove that it engages in sex discrimination. After all, men and women are different and any  large employer would necessarily show some pattern of sex discrimination. The initial suit was filed in 2001 by six former and current female hourly workers and managers who accused Wal-Mart of a pattern of denying women workers equal pay and opportunities. The women alleged they made less than men doing the same jobs, although they had equal or more experience. Others said men were favored for promotions into managerial positions. Hundreds of thousands of female employees have since jumped on board the case, hoping to ride this horse to the races along with the lawyers who have magnanimously sought them out. Read More »

Photo by Dorothea Lange, 1937

 I once asked the nothingness, What shall I do? What shall I do?

And, a voice spoke. Do nothing. Stay where you are.