EMILY D. writes:
My husband and I are always sad when I go to my brother’s home. My sister-in-law is the typical “modern woman” and her marriage to my brother is a microcosm of the feminist absurdity you write about. She never cooks, and as a result her son is a very poor eater and is overweight, even though he is only three. (more…)
SINCE I began this website, I have received a number of eloquent, personal notes from readers. These moving letters described serious personal suffering. A middle-aged woman wrote of her marriage, one hellish experience after another, and her decision to avoid divorce. A man told me of a woman who had cruelly slighted him and belittled his expression of affection after their romance had ended. Fifty years old and divorced, expecting to live alone and never have another romance for the rest of his life, he was not bitter, just exhausted. A female reader wrote about her lifelong depression and poverty. She had begun to go to church by herself at the age of 10 because her parents were non-believers. A man wrote of serious illness.
I did not post any of these notes, even when readers gave me permission to, because they were too poignant and intimate. The best I could do was privately express consolation. Modern life is crushingly impersonal. Professionals will listen to you for a fee and provide a diagnosis. But there is often nowhere to rest your head. There is no place to cry for a few minutes.
I am praying for you this Christmas Eve. I have not forgotten your notes. Suffering is never wasted if we listen to what it has to say.
SEE these comments at VFR. Daniel H. from Seattle writes:
Triumphant secularists love to point out that the timing of Christmas was melded with pagan celebrations of the winter solstice, as if that proved Christmas to be a fraud. But this, of course, is an impossibly juvenile response. Why is Christmas associated with the winter solstice, and not, say, the autumnal equinox or some other random astrological phenomenon? Because it is central to the Christian story that in darkest night, a light is born. It is the central theme of the Christian ethos. This idea is so central to all of Western society (thanks to Christianity), that even the most inane Hollywood schlock movie relies on that theme. It resonates with even the most degraded secularist because it is (a) oddly familiar for reasons he doesn’t understand, and (b) oddly true for reasons he refuses to acknowledge.
THE all-male choral ensemble Chanticleer, of San Francisco, performs Charles Ives’ “A Christmas Carol.” This is from the group’s excellent album, Sing We Christmas.
SEVEN YEARS AGO, my husband went out on Christmas Eve to pick up some clothes at the dry cleaners. About an hour after he left, a large police cruiser pulled into our driveway. The moment before I saw my husband get out of the vehicle was sickening. I thought they had come to tell me of his death.
But he emerged from the cruiser. His head was cut up. He was shaken and he had large shopping bags in his hands. Here is the story of his adventure. (more…)
FORTUNATELY, there has been some backlash against the article in Sunday’s weddings section of The New York Times about Carol Anne Riddell and John Partilla, a New York couple who met at their childrens’ school and married after leaving their first spouses. There are many harsh remarks, as well as some comments defending the couple, in the comments section after the initial article. New York Magazine has a critical item, in which the groom regrets the publicity. One wonders if anyone has thought to contact the former spouses and ask what their reaction was when they opened a leading newspaper to find a glowing tribute to the affair that ruined their home lives. It would be similar to opening the paper and reading a glowing interview of a kidnapper who had taken your child.
A regular reader writes:
I really enjoyed your post on race.
I think the people who complained about your entries on rape statistics (here and here) are missing the point. There are two basic groups in humanity: those who want to adapt to reality, and those who want all decisions to be subjective because they fear oversight. (more…)
IT appears to be increasingly common for women to superficially disavow feminism. That means, when asked if they are feminist, they say, “No, I’m not a feminist.” But saying so doesn’t necessarily make it so. I can say I don’t notice cold weather, but if I wear a coat, obviously I do.
What does it take for a woman not to be a feminist? She must explicitly and publicly reject feminist principles. (more…)
THE REPEAL this weekend of Don't Ask, Don't Tell is a further step in the reckless feminization of our military forces. How can men cultivate the traits necessary for combat and at the same time condone open effeminacy in their ranks or fight alongside women, as was recently recommended by a Congressional panel? Common sense tells us they cannot. As Lawrence Auster writes: The country is about to embark, completely unnecessarily, on an insane experiment that will cause no end of problems for years or decades to come, turn the military into a sexual and litigious battleground between homosexuals and straights, and discourage the enlistment of capable men who will not want to serve in such a decadent Army, Navy, and Air Force. The homosexualists’ and liberals’ real aim is to turn us, militarily speaking, into the equivalent of the Netherlands.
HERE is a 1993 version by the King’s College Chapel Choir of Cambridge University of the lovely hymn, “Jesus Christ the Apple Tree,” an austere contrast to jingle bell clamorousness.
ELIZABETH WRIGHT writes:
Perhaps you’ve seen this story of two selfish monsters who rationalize their destruction of both of their families. It wasn’t so long ago that even the New York Times would not have celebrated the remarriage of this man and woman, who “fell in love” with someone else’s spouse, and consider their decision to leave their children acceptable, because they are “soul mates.” I mean, this is really stunning.
BRUCE CHARLTON, writing at his blog, praises the extremely time-consuming, but rewarding format for commenting at this blog. He writes:
I am not a huge fan of comments on blogs.
Indeed, when I first began looking at blogs and for quite a while, I was put-off reading several blogs (despite enjoying the postings) because of the comments.
The postings might be good, but the world of the comments that followed them was horrific. (more…)
SPEAKING of rape, how is it possible for a woman to rape a man? As far as I know, it is physically impossible. Nevertheless, Lisa M. Lavoie, a Massachusetts teacher, has been convicted of statutory rape and will serve a three- to five-year prison term.
KRISTOR writes:
Coincidentally, I am reading a book by René Guénon, The Symbolism of the Cross, one of his metaphysical works. It is the first time I have had the pleasure of reading Guénon. I am completely staggered with amazement. He is, without exaggeration, one of the most brilliant and learned men I have ever encountered. I can’t wait to start in on his other books. I’m learning a ton. I will say, however, that the book is challenging. A reader with no background in Greek metaphysics, particularly Neo-Platonism, might find it to be nothing but portentous sounding gibberish.
Many of Guénon’s books have appeared in English for the first time only in the last few years. Sophia Perennis has a Collected Works which I am now determined to own. My first volume of the set is already dog-eared, and heavily annotated, and I’m only halfway through. (more…)
ROGER G. writes:
You never should have posted that “Sexual Fluidity, cont.” entry and Andrej Pejic photo. It was nearly too much for me, and you know how sentimental some of your readers are. It probably killed them.
Fortunately, I was able to reach the picture of my nephew in his hockey uniform and stare at it for a half hour, so I’m all right. (more…)
A READER writes:
Your recent post, “Rape and Race,” has produced quite a few negative reactions from people who have been offended at what they feel was implied racism on your part. Their reaction, as far as I can tell, may not have been your intent. However, I feel that they are somewhat justified in their response due to the ambiguous nature of the post. (more…)
THOMAS F. BERTONNEAU writes:
Regarding male (or “male”) model, Andrej Pejic – the photograph of him that you reproduced today is creepy and disturbing. I reacted to it with visceral loathing. My guess is that, whatever sexual neurosis Pejic is acting out, he is also aiming precisely at the effect of being creepy and disturbing. If such a person had manifested himself in a public place in 1950, he probably would have been arrested and, if not charged with indecency, then placed under psychiatric detention pending a cure. Nowadays he enjoys a “career” and is a “celebrity.” Our afflicted society produces these grotesques one after another and in droves, a sign of how profound the cultural malaise is. (more…)
