DUE to illness and the holiday, I have not been able to post for two days or respond to e-mails. But I hope to do so later today or tomorrow.

KRISTOR writes in this post about Calvinist predestination:

The analogy to which Alan refers, of God setting up the action of the play “behind the scenes,” while we merely recite the lines, meanwhile laboring under the illusion that they are ours, seems to me to fail. If the players can do nothing more than recite the lines they have been given by the director or playwright, then despite their delusions to the contrary, the lines are not theirs at all. If they say, “I hate God,” they do so as tools only, mere robots or puppets, and no more. (more…)

ALAN ROEBUCK writes:

There has been some discussion of Calvinism at your site.  As a Calvinist myself, I’d like to add some explanation. 

Christian apologist Greg Koukl has provided a very useful insight. He says “Calvinism describes what’s going on behind the scenes.”  Behind the scenes, God predestines. But “on stage,” as it were, we don’t feel predestined. We have free will, in the ordinary sense of the word, and this was defined best by Jonathan Edwards: Free will is the ability to choose what we want to choose. And we clearly have the ability to choose what we want to choose. So we have free will, in this sense.  (more…)

THE DISCUSSION continues here on whether atheists can coherently argue for morality or tradition. In the following response to a reader, Kristor makes an excellent point. It is a point that was made by others, but Kristor fully demonstrates its validity. In sum, there is no such thing as an atheist conservative. In fact, there is no such thing as an atheist liberal. Yes, people can call themselves by these labels. But they are employing oxymorons.  The conservative atheist cannot champion moral or political convictions anymore than the atheist liberal can.

Or, let’s say they can champion values, but only by contradicting themselves. As Kristor argues, “You can’t have moral convictions of any kind and be a thoroughgoing atheist. If you have such convictions, you are not really an atheist, in the sense that you are not really carrying your atheism into practice.”

Here are Kristor’s full comments.  (more…)

FITZGERALD writes:

Here’s a great comment from an article at The Spearhead:

“You make laws that allow women to be irresponsible, a greater portion of them will be irresponsible. …

I have met way too many women who have made complete trainwrecks out of their lives, and tried (and often succeeded) at pulling as many men down with them along the way (usually out of imagined spite – based on fictional musings of oppressions past).”

My brother is seeing this first hand. His wife of 12 years is divorcing him for a litany of perceived offenses.  He’s not an abuser of women or substances, just an average Joe Beta male. (more…)

MY TEENAGE SON AND I accompanied my elderly parents to the orchestra last week. We sat behind a young woman of about 20 years of age whom I will call Jessica. Jessica had long luxurious blonde hair and large, expensive sunglasses that were propped on her head. She wore leggings and boots. Her handbag was an enormous leather tote, so large it might easily accomodate two severed heads if things should ever come to that, and her nails were professionally manicured with a frosty tint.

Jessica was at this performance of one of the world’s premier orchestras to complete an assignment for a college class on music appreciation or history. We knew this because we saw her berating someone who appeared to be an instructor before the concert. The instructor was reluctant to give Jessica the written assignment sheet because she mistakenly thought Jessica did not have a ticket. Jessica procured the assignment after aggressively reciting her rights. (more…)

  CLINT HILL, the Secret Service agent assigned to Jacqueline Kennedy, movingly describes his impressions of her in The New York Times.

  KEEP The Thinking Housewife alive. Please help support this site today.

I WAS talking with a high school student about George Washington the other day. We were discussing the first president’s character and life as described in Richard Brookhiser’s biography of Washington, Founding Father: Rediscovering George Washington, a book which the student is reading.

The student said matter-of-factly, “The good thing about George Washington is that no one says he was homosexual.” (more…)

Walenty Lisek writes:

I’ve been reading your thread “More on Conservative Apologetics” and was struck by the caricature of atheism which was presented. Being both right-wing and being an atheist isn’t a popular combination. To many it may seem unnatural or contradictory for someone to embrace both positions. But this is because of the prejudices of our age and not due to any inherent conflicts.

The word “atheism” literally means what it says “a” – without, and “theism” – god; “without god” is a pretty good definition. A more grammar friendly wording would be “without belief in god” or another formulation “believing god does not exist.” (more…)

OLIVIA  ELIOT writes:

I’m e-mailing to thank you wholeheartedly for the work you do on your blog. I’m a 21-year-old student, attending one of the more liberal universities in Ontario, and I’m surrounded daily by feminists, pro-abortionists, radical homosexuals, and anarchists, all supported by the university. It settles my mind, and keeps me sane, to come home after a long day, and read your blog.

I study physics because it fascinates me, but my plan, God willing, is to become a wife, and homeschooling mother of several children. Since starting to read your blog this year, I feel much more able to enter into debates and discussions with people who think that my plans are silly, and I do so with very little fear.

Your posts – and the ensuing discussions – about sexuality have been extremely helpful as well. This is an issue that is especially pertinent on a university campus. I felt compelled to compose this letter to my student newspaper recently, in reaction to some really alarming events I had seen advertised: (more…)

SAVE THIS blog from shipwreck! Get me off this mast. Please give here to the future existence of the Thinking Housewife.

(more…)

A MINNEAPOLIS WOMAN has set up a website to take reader input on whether she and her husband should abort their 17-week-old fetus. According to The Daily Mail, she is upfront about why she has difficulty with the idea of motherhood:

‘I’m not convinced that I want to change the status quo. I feel that as I age I’ve actually gotten more selfish and set in my ways…

‘I’m afraid that I will eventually regret starting a family and “settling down”, as they say. ‘I fear that the constant pressure to be the perfect wife and mother while maintaining a full-time job will eventually cause my brain to implode and lead to a nervous breakdown.’ (more…)

KRISTOR WRITES:

Alan Roebuck’s recent essay on conservative apologetics reminded me of what James H. wrote in this entry:

Years ago, while speaking to a left coast female physician at a conference, I went into my spiel about how important it is for a woman to spread her wings, have a career, fulfill her destiny and realize her full potential. Of course she nodded dutifully in agreement, an expression of bovine resignation written on her face. After just a few seconds I added, “and if a total stranger has to raise your children, well then so be it! After all, you can easily find a minimum wage employee to love your child just as much as you do.” (more…)

    HERE is another compelling portrait by Gilbert Stuart, a painting of Sarah Wentworth Apthorp Morton (1759-1846), the wife of Boston lawyer Perez Morton, who famously cheated on her with her sister. Mrs. Morton was known for her poetry, which she sometimes wrote under the pseudonym of Constantia. She lost three of her five children. The painting now belongs to the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston.  

ARTIFICIAL contraception and economic changes are generally believed to be the main causes of the dramatic decline in birth rates of the last two centuries. There is a strong case to be made, however, that there was at least one other important factor. The drop in fertility parallels the growth in the modern state school and the industrialization of childrearing.

Fertility in America began to drop significantly from the 1830’s onward, decreasing by 50 percent between 1800 and 1900, with the greater part of that drop occurring after 1870. Between 1870 and 1920, the American birth rate declined by 30 percent.* According to The History of Contraception from Antiquity to the Present Day by Angus MacLaren:

“In Utica, New York, for example, native-born middle-class women who had begun their childbearing in the 1820s had on average 5.8 children; those who began ten years later had only 3.6 children.”

This was a region of heavy industrialization, which was obviously a factor. (more…)

  THEY had all had breakfast in Ms. Curtis’s sleek bamboo kitchen. Ms. Curtis made waffles; Mr. Petrini made bacon upstairs in his apartment and brought it down with him. The night before, they had had dinner at the Curtis-Hetfield dining table and then moved upstairs to watch “The Birdcage” in Mr. Petrini’s living room (his television is closer to the fireplace). Then they all retired to their own bedrooms, including Ms. Curtis and Mr. Petrini. Hers opens to the garden; his is on the third floor. (A pause to savor the luxury that each member of this family enjoys.) You may think this is an excerpt from a Dorothy Parker short story, but in fact it is a real life description of a Manhattan couple who have created what The New York Times portrays as an enlightened arrangement for their post-divorce romance. She lives with her family in the ground-floor apartment and he lives with his in the top floor apartment. They commute between the two abodes. Thousands of post-divorce couples eke out an existence in grubby apartments with unmade beds, their fortunes permanently diminished by the plutocratic standards set by America's elite, while the Curtis and Petrini households are "fluid," sun-lit and well-applianced.